Display / Critique Logos here!

2»

Comments

  • beetle8beetle8 Registered Users Posts: 677 Major grins
    edited February 21, 2008
    I don't think you should mix two radically
    I agree with that

    I'll take some crit
    248336254_qQrS3-O.gif
  • SloYerRollSloYerRoll Registered Users Posts: 2,788 Major grins
    edited February 21, 2008
    beetle8 wrote:
    248336254_qQrS3-O.gif
    I think you did a good job regarding placement with the font you chose. I'm not a big fan of Serif fonts in logo's. But that's more preference then anything. You break a few logo rules, but did a good job breaking them IMOmwink.gif

    I'd work a bit more on your kerning and make sure that you have anti-aliasing turned on when typing or exporting.

    Rule of thumb for anti-aliasing is that if the font size is 12pt or less, do not use it. 13pt or more, use it.

    So I guess this is just for your personal work and not for anything else, right? I have tons of logo's I've created professionally, but haven't gotten around to myself yet since I don't pay as well as other people :D
  • Deadeye008Deadeye008 Registered Users Posts: 168 Major grins
    edited February 21, 2008
    I'll take some C&C on mine:
    StarLogo4BlackBG.jpg
  • DavidTODavidTO Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 19,160 Major grins
    edited February 21, 2008
    beetle8 wrote:
    I agree with that

    I'll take some crit
    248336254_qQrS3-O.gif


    Boring. ne_nau.gif
    Moderator Emeritus
    Dgrin FAQ | Me | Workshops
  • SloYerRollSloYerRoll Registered Users Posts: 2,788 Major grins
    edited February 21, 2008
    Deadeye008 wrote:
    I'll take some C&C on mine:
    StarLogo4BlackBG.jpg
    If I didn't see you name in the sig. I'd still be staring at it trying to figure out what it said.
  • beetle8beetle8 Registered Users Posts: 677 Major grins
    edited February 21, 2008
    DavidTO wrote:
    Boring. ne_nau.gif
    Well, I'm OK with that.
    There is something to be said for Simplicity
  • SloYerRollSloYerRoll Registered Users Posts: 2,788 Major grins
    edited February 21, 2008
    beetle8 wrote:
    Well, I'm OK with that.
    There is something to be said for Simplicity
    The thing is Keith. It's not that simple. The Adobe "A" is simple.

    To mentally register your logo, have to read three separate components on three different planes. After you read it, you then have to put the words together.

    Admittedly, this only takes about a second, but considering the blistering rate the human brain can process data. About a second is a long time.

    Not trying to beat you up on this. Just trying to show you a broader perspective.
  • beetle8beetle8 Registered Users Posts: 677 Major grins
    edited February 21, 2008
    I don't have a multi million dollar ad budget to brand a single letter into recognition.
    However I do apreciate the C&C
  • RogersDARogersDA Registered Users Posts: 3,502 Major grins
    edited February 22, 2008
    beetle8 wrote:
    I agree with that

    I'll take some crit
    248336254_qQrS3-O.gif


    I agree - this is a bit plain. Champion of what? Why include the LLC (unless laws require that).

    I took a look at your photos - and gymnastics appears to be your current sports type. I took the liberty of taking a very quick stab at this for inspiration.

    257596586_wt8Td-M.jpg

    257631012_Zxmhe-M.jpg
  • beetle8beetle8 Registered Users Posts: 677 Major grins
    edited February 22, 2008
    both atractive renditions
    the LLC is required, kinda like inc. or corp. it lets the consumer know what kind of entity they are dealing with.
  • SloYerRollSloYerRoll Registered Users Posts: 2,788 Major grins
    edited February 22, 2008
    http://creativebits.org/what_is_a_logo

    Really pay attention to the 4th and 5th paragraphs.

    I've been a fan of Stephanie's work for many years and she is a fantastic designer.

    creativebits.org is also a great place to have your logo critiqued. Be careful though. They don't hold back punches there. They'll tell you how it is. But they won't do it nastily.
  • SloYerRollSloYerRoll Registered Users Posts: 2,788 Major grins
    edited February 23, 2008
    Heres another article showing the evolution of modern day coprorate logo's:
    http://www.neatorama.com/2008/02/07/the-evolution-of-tech-companies-logos/
  • W00DYW00DY Registered Users Posts: 183 Major grins
    edited February 27, 2008
    please comment on my new logo
    Hi All,

    Well I am sort of re-inventing myself so it was time for a new logo. It's ok, I am not that bib *yet* that this will have a negative effect. However I do want to get it right this time so I never change it again.

    I know it is pretty simple, but I think this is a good thing. What do you think?

    My thinking was that depending on the page or the image the word follan coudl always change colour. I had a hard time choosing the blue as the default colour. I really liked a shade of pink but then, I don't know?

    Can you please have a look and let me know what you think:

    p450395095.jpg

    Appreciate your time.

    Andrew
  • TangoTango Registered Users Posts: 4,592 Major grins
    edited February 27, 2008
    dontcha know your going to get a different opinion from everyone?ne_nau.gif:D

    if you like it, you like it.:D

    now what do i think?,,,,

    i like your colors & fonts very much.
    small print is to small, imo....
    also, i would even out the sizes between follan & photography....
    or maybe not so big/little
    ......JMHO
    Aaron Nelson
  • TangoTango Registered Users Posts: 4,592 Major grins
    edited February 27, 2008
    maybe overlap big follan with the small photog.....ne_nau.gif
    Aaron Nelson
  • W00DYW00DY Registered Users Posts: 183 Major grins
    edited February 27, 2008
    Thanks Aaron,

    Yep, I know I will get different opinions from everyone, but that also means different ideas (like your overlapping). I then think about all the ideas/opinions and implement the ones I like until I have a finished product.

    I did originally have the size differnece between follan & photography smaller, but then I felt like I had to make the quote smaller and then it was to hard to read :D

    Thanks for your comments. I am going to try the overlap?
  • TangoTango Registered Users Posts: 4,592 Major grins
    edited February 27, 2008
    i should not try to be funny....im not good at itheadscratch.gif

    im looking forward in seeing the overlapping version
    Aaron Nelson
  • W00DYW00DY Registered Users Posts: 183 Major grins
    edited February 27, 2008

    im looking forward in seeing the overlapping version

    Sorry, you won't be seeing it... I didn;t think it worked too well :D
  • denisegoldbergdenisegoldberg Administrators Posts: 14,372 moderator
    edited February 27, 2008
    W00DY wrote:
    p450395095.jpg

    Andrew
    I like the simplicity of follan photography, but I wonder if bolding "follan" might make a better impression? Also - your "modern portraiture & weddings" line is very difficult to read, don't know if it's the font or the size, or a combination of both.

    --- Denise
  • urbanariesurbanaries Registered Users Posts: 2,690 Major grins
    edited February 27, 2008
    I think you have a great start. I love the clean lines and color palette you have chosen. And I am very envious that your business name (follan) has no extenders below the baseline. Stacking words is soooo much cleaner when you have no extenders.

    With that in mind, I have a few suggestions....I like the combination of fonts, but you've chosen the decorative font (less readable) for a line that has the most text. What about stacking follan and photography vertically, using the decorative font for the "photography" portion (a word that our eyes will recognize easier even in a less readable font), and then your light sans serif for "modern portraiture and weddings?"....play around with its position relation to the business name.
    Canon 5D MkI
    50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.8, 24-70 2.8L, 35mm 1.4L, 135mm f2L
    ST-E2 Transmitter + (3) 580 EXII + radio poppers
  • pemmettpemmett Registered Users Posts: 507 Major grins
    edited February 27, 2008
    W00DY wrote:

    Can you please have a look and let me know what you think:

    p450395095.jpg

    I love the clean lines and together with the colour they say modern and progressive to me - BUT the decorative text at the bottom just seems to clash with the modern feel with the main text, as well as running off to the right of the main text.

    My 2 centavos are to keep it all clean - start with the main text only and then see how the smaller text can be added in whilst keeping the main text clean. One suggestion is to run the smal text justified to the same length as the main text but with a clean "sans serif" font - maybe even use the same font you used for the word photography.

    Well my two centavos are up. Good luck.
    "Take a moment to capture a memory that will last forever"
    My images | My blog | My free course
  • sac23sac23 Registered Users Posts: 22 Big grins
    edited March 2, 2008
    New Logo, let me know what you think!!!
    I saw the earlier post about the new logo and thought I would also post our new logo. We have messed around with several different logos but finally got to the point that we just want something very simple and you can't get much more simple than this one. Please let me know what you think of it. Thanks. SC

    259640216_X5Gvy-S.jpg

    www.imagecreationsphotography.com
  • thenimirrathenimirra Registered Users Posts: 697 Major grins
    edited March 3, 2008
    I usually love scripted text, but I find this one a little hard to read at first. Granted I am looking at it from a 17 in laptop screen, but I still had to lean in to make out the "creation" part.

    I love the script mixed with the normal text at the bottom, but I wonder if the script needs to be enlarged a bit or something to make it more legible.
  • claudermilkclaudermilk Registered Users Posts: 2,756 Major grins
    edited March 3, 2008
    I like the idea as well. I agree that the script typeface used could be a bit more legible. Also, the photography line seems to be placed randomly underneath--no alignment point, but thats just my own preference.
  • W00DYW00DY Registered Users Posts: 183 Major grins
    edited March 3, 2008
    Thank for all the comments. My old logo was stacked and whilst I liked it, I found it harder to "fit" with lot of things (business cards, website, contracts etc...) the longer, flatter image is just easier to work with.

    I have picked out a few colour's for the word follan, I think it is nice if the logo colour changes with the environment, some may not like this though?

    Anyway, Thanks for your comments

    clap.gif
  • DavidTODavidTO Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 19,160 Major grins
    edited March 3, 2008
    I merged a couple of logo threads into this main one we've had going. deal.gif
    Moderator Emeritus
    Dgrin FAQ | Me | Workshops
  • sac23sac23 Registered Users Posts: 22 Big grins
    edited March 3, 2008
    thenimirra wrote:
    I usually love scripted text, but I find this one a little hard to read at first. Granted I am looking at it from a 17 in laptop screen, but I still had to lean in to make out the "creation" part.

    I love the script mixed with the normal text at the bottom, but I wonder if the script needs to be enlarged a bit or something to make it more legible.


    When I came back to the forum to see what replies there may have been I also noticed the script was a little hard to read. We have had it printed out and it seems more legible also if you look at the website it seems more legible. I am only looking from a 15" monitor and it seems very small, lol. Thank You.
  • sac23sac23 Registered Users Posts: 22 Big grins
    edited March 3, 2008
    I like the idea as well. I agree that the script typeface used could be a bit more legible. Also, the photography line seems to be placed randomly underneath--no alignment point, but thats just my own preference.

    Thanks Chris. I wrote in my last post about the legibility and as far as the alignment, my wife is more of a structured person and she was looking for a point to align the word photography. I guess me being a little more off the wall I kind of wanted it more random so we tried it and kind of liked it. Thanks for the comment.

    www.imagecreationsphotography.com
  • W00DYW00DY Registered Users Posts: 183 Major grins
    edited March 4, 2008
    sac23 wrote:
    Thanks Chris. I wrote in my last post about the legibility and as far as the alignment, my wife is more of a structured person and she was looking for a point to align the word photography. I guess me being a little more off the wall I kind of wanted it more random so we tried it and kind of liked it. Thanks for the comment.

    www.imagecreationsphotography.com

    Funny, we both posted logo's where the bottom line ran off a little... I like this much more as well. Everything is always so structured, I think it looks good wings.gif
  • DI-JoeDI-Joe Registered Users Posts: 368 Major grins
    edited March 8, 2008
    I'll give mine a stab. I designed this a long while ago, but it's finally in mass use now. I quite like it. But that'd be kind of obvious huh?

    259092451_Yc8nG-L.png
    Modus Imagery
    Moving away from photography and into cinema. PM me if you have questions about DSLR workflow or production questions.
    Film Reel: http://vimeo.com/19955876
Sign In or Register to comment.