Looking at a new camera

Josh125

Hello all - I'm looking to move up to an xti from my current P&S G5. I love the G5, no question. I'm trying to convince the wife we need to upgrade though. She is asking me why, to that I am saying it's a more robust camera that will capture cleaner pictures and give me more options. Ha, sounds OK?

My question is this. I'm on a somewhat limited budget, so glass is going to come slow. To the end, is there a piece I can get that will serve as a good staring lens to meet both my indoor and outdoor needs? I don't shot sports but enjoy taking landscape and "people" pics. The sigma 17-70 seems to get great reviews and would just about top out my budget with a body.

Thoughts?

jbswear

Stick with the kit for now
If you're on a budget, don't worry about upgrading the lenses yet. The kit lens, though not L standard, is not a bad lens. It will be a great 'walk-around' lens, and will take great photographs.

I, too, am new to dSLR's. I bought my first in November--the XTi. I love it. So far I would recommend MAYBE one lens for you--the 'nifty 50', as it's called. It's a great portrait lens, fast, and easy to use. Amazon.com has it here:

http://www.amazon.com/Canon-50mm-1-8-Camera-Lens/dp/B00007E7JU/sr=8-1/qid=1172588007/ref=pd_bbs_1/104-8231731-6501510?ie=UTF8&s=electronics

Along with that, though, I HIGHLY recommend a battery grip. It makes the camera a bit easier to hold (for me at least) and doubles the life of the batteries.

Here without extra batteries:

http://www.amazon.com/Opteka-Battery-Canon-Digital-Rebel/dp/B000EDB1II/sr=1-4/qid=1172588149/ref=sr_1_4/104-8231731-6501510?ie=UTF8&s=electronics

And here with:

http://www.amazon.com/Opteka-Battery-Grip-XT-Batteries/dp/B000G3KLPA/sr=1-3/qid=1172588149/ref=pd_bbs_sr_3/104-8231731-6501510?ie=UTF8&s=electronics

Speaking of batteries...I buy the generics off eBay. Instead of $30+ each, I spend $4 each, and have had no problems. In your search on eBay, just type in "XTi battery". You'll find hundreds.

HTH

Terrence

I started with the Sigma 17-70 and still use it as my walking around lens. I highly reccomend it. I have a Rebel XT and I don't see a compelling difference between the XT and XTi, so you could opt for the XT body and get yourself the extras that you may not be thinking about (extra batteries, CF cards, case/bag, monopod, etc.).

The main selling point for my graduation from P&S was control over aperture and shutter speed to get better pictures of my young son. The P&S was just not fast enough to capture him.

ziggy53

Josh125 wrote:

Hello all - I'm looking to move up to an xti from my current P&S G5. I love the G5, no question. I'm trying to convince the wife we need to upgrade though. She is asking me why, to that I am saying it's a more robust camera that will capture cleaner pictures and give me more options. Ha, sounds OK?

My question is this. I'm on a somewhat limited budget, so glass is going to come slow. To the end, is there a piece I can get that will serve as a good staring lens to meet both my indoor and outdoor needs? I don't shot sports but enjoy taking landscape and "people" pics. The sigma 17-70 seems to get great reviews and would just about top out my budget with a body.

Thoughts?

Actually, the Sigma 17-70mm, f/2.8-4.5 DC appears to have many desireable qualities, including price. I would suggest that the camera/lens combination you have chosen would serve you well, and cover many shooting situations.

Understand that, by itself, improving the camera and lens will not improve your photography. Many people are surprised to see that a dSLR can produce pretty crappy images, considering how much more they cost over the average consumer Point-n-Shoot.

The trick is learning new techniques and new skills, and that is where this photographic community comes in. We have many highly talented individuals, some have natural genius, who will be able to help improve your situation photographically.

I would suggest that your budget needs to include a decent flash unit. A good flash, properly used, can make "any" camera produce much better interior images.

At very least, I suggest the Sunpak 383 auto flash. It has tilt and swivel which, in conjunction with some inexpensive/DIY light modifiers and technique, will allow a level of magnitude better interior images, and valuable outdoor fill as well.

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=Search&A=details&Q=&sku=52799&is=REG&addedTroughType=search
http://www.adorama.com/SU383.html?searchinfo=sunpak%20383&item_no=1

A much better unit is the Sigma EF-500 DG Super E-TTL, but that will impact your budget significantly.

http://www.sigma4less.com/sess/utn;jsessionid=1545e4435bc7319/shopdata/0020_Flashes/0010_Shoe+Mount+Flashes/product_details.shopscript?article=0180_Sigma%2BEF-500%2BDG%2BSuper%2BE-TTL%2BShoe%2BMount%2BFlash%2Bfor%2BCanon%2BEOS%2Bwith%2BE-TTL%2BII%2BOperation%2B%3D28SGEF500SUDCA%3D29


Even better is the EX series flashes from Canon, but now your budget goes completely awry:

Canon 580EX
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=Search&A=details&Q=&sku=348457&is=USA&addedTroughType=search
http://www.adorama.com/CA580EXU.html?searchinfo=580ex&item_no=10

Canon 430EX
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=4658&A=details&Q=&sku=397664&is=USA&addedTroughType=categoryNavigation
http://www.adorama.com/CA430EXU.html?searchinfo=canon%20430ex&item_no=9


Anyway, good luck with your decision and purchase, and remember to share your experience and your images back here, at the Digital Grin.

Richard

Josh125 wrote:

My question is this. I'm on a somewhat limited budget, so glass is going to come slow. To the end, is there a piece I can get that will serve as a good staring lens to meet both my indoor and outdoor needs? I don't shot sports but enjoy taking landscape and "people" pics. The sigma 17-70 seems to get great reviews and would just about top out my budget with a body.

Thoughts?

The Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 is an excellent value. Costs around $370 new and can frequently be found for $300 second hand. Lots of people on this forum use it. It's not very wide, but it's fast and has very good sharpness, color and contrast.

Good luck.

BCC

We have a Nikon D200 and D40. The D40, imo, is a great dslr that takes very good pictures, is easy to use and has an attractive price point with a lens for $600. Great sensor, especially for the price.

My wife likes the relatively small size and light weight. It's a personal thing.

It is true some of the older lenses are not fully compatible, but this shouldn't be and issue at all if this is your first slr.

Terrence

ziggy53 wrote:

Understand that, by itself, improving the camera and lens will not improve your photography. Many people are surprised to see that a dSLR can produce pretty crappy images, considering how much more they cost over the average consumer Point-n-Shoot.

The trick is learning new techniques and new skills, and that is where this photographic community comes in. We have many highly talented individuals, some have natural genius, who will be able to help improve your situation photographically.

Ziggy is soooooo right. I learned very quickly how to take awful pictures with my $1000 work of new gear. Get a few books and read about exposure and how the camera works. Most importantly, don't get frustrated in the beginning. There is a learning curve. Stick with it and you will improve.

Josh125

Thanks everyone for the help and advise, I do appreciate it. The G5 has been a great camera to learn on and to be honest really hasn't limited me much at all. I would just like more options to further my development. I don't plan to go pro, ha, but would like to continue this as a great hobby.

Again, I do appreciate your help!

edit: With a new camera comes new gear, specifcally a bag. There seems to be soooo many bags out there to choose from. I looking for a light over the shoulder bag. Is there one that is a clear winner?

Terrence

I use a Tamrac holster bag. Fits just what I need and it isn't bulky. I have two of them actually.

I just made a deal for a 30D, so if you want a good price on a used XT (not XTi), PM me.

TylerW

Is there a particular reason why the G5 is letting you down?

Josh125

The primary reason is the zoom, while 4x works most of the time it does limit me frequently.

ziggy53

Josh125 wrote:

The primary reason is the zoom, while 4x works most of the time it does limit me frequently.

Er, um, you realize that the Sigma 17-70mm, f/2.8-4.5 DC is also around a 4x zoom?

Reasons most digicam users are looking to upgrade to a dSLR:

To achieve the advantages of less image noise, especially at high ISO.
More lens flexibility, at the expense of cost and convenience.
Faster responsiveness of the system. (Starup time, shutter lag, viewfinder lag)
Much better exposure control.
RAW image file format for better post-processing.
Optical viewfinder.

(Not necessarily in any order.)

There are still many advantages to a digicam as well. Buy whatever suits your "needs", not what suits you whims.

Josh125

Yes indeed it is 4x, however I have options at the point!

....and let's be honest, it's a new toy :ivar

fmkjr

Not gear but it was a big help to me...

Josh125 wrote:

Yes indeed it is 4x, however I have options at the point!

....and let's be honest, it's a new toy :ivar

I know this is not gear and might not be as much fun
However, Understanding Exposure: How to Shoot Great Photographs with a Film or Digital... By: Bryan Peterson proved to be an excellent resource when I switched from the Sony F707 to a dSLR.

Congrats on sticking to a budget ...

I have the Nikon D50 and the 18-55 lens and purchased both used for $400 (a few months ago) with minimal clicks on it. Purchasing the camera used might be an option opening up the possibility to purchase the lens you mentioned and stay within budget. (I recently added the 55-200 and hope to purchase the 50 mm 1.8).

Welcome to the exciting world of dSLRs...

frank