Auto-color not totally infallible, right?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae012/ae012c4b19d32df9b727aacd824b7128503cb53b" alt="Nimai"
I know how much Auto-color is raved about - and I agree! It really does a great job... almost every time. Tell me, though, for these two shots, would the Auto-color version look better in print? On screen, I like the originals better (even though I think the first one should be brighter, somehow):
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b622a/b622aee260bf159f852421fc705c8d44534e6094" alt="133468188-S.jpg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76a55/76a55a2f022b51761e33dbbd11acce7d0ff524c7" alt="133469692-S.jpg"
0
Comments
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
Here's what SmugMug shows me when I go to Color Effects and check out Auto Color - not as good me thinks. Are they using the same software?
No, color effects auto is not the same. We'll get there, someday, but it's not. You can get your own i2e at a special "ClubSmug" deal, you know:
http://www.dgrin.com/showthread.php?t=51034
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
So, just to be totally clear: Color effects "Auto" not-equal i2e Auto. And, when I configure my print settings for my galleries, and I choose Auto, it is going to do what Color effects Auto does, right?
Portfolio • Workshops • Facebook • Twitter
At least I get it now. Thanks!