Why such odd paper sizes?

mercphotomercphoto Registered Users Posts: 4,550 Major grins
edited February 1, 2005 in Accessories
When I look at printers I'm surprised at the paper sizes they support. Letter-sized printers at 8.5x11" is obvious, though honestly I wish someone made an 8.5" by 12" paper so I could print 8x12's at home.

But 13x19"? The largest standard frame that fits is 11x14. The 12x18 size is nice but odd. And you can't find a 13x19 frame (from what I can find). The next size up is 17x22, again an odd size. You can get a 16x20 (and without going borderless), but can't go 16x24.

Is there a historical reason for these paper sizes?
Bill Jurasz - Mercury Photography - Cedar Park, TX
A former sports shooter
Follow me at: https://www.flickr.com/photos/bjurasz/
My Etsy store: https://www.etsy.com/shop/mercphoto?ref=hdr_shop_menu

Comments

  • pathfinderpathfinder Super Moderators Posts: 14,708 moderator
    edited January 24, 2005
    mercphoto wrote:
    When I look at printers I'm surprised at the paper sizes they support. Letter-sized printers at 8.5x11" is obvious, though honestly I wish someone made an 8.5" by 12" paper so I could print 8x12's at home.

    But 13x19"? The largest standard frame that fits is 11x14. The 12x18 size is nice but odd. And you can't find a 13x19 frame (from what I can find). The next size up is 17x22, again an odd size. You can get a 16x20 (and without going borderless), but can't go 16x24.

    Is there a historical reason for these paper sizes?
    13x19 accepts a 12x18 frame which is the standard 35mm rectangle full frame image or 24mm by 36mm or 2/3 ratio. 14 x 21 is also a 2/3 ratio.

    Not sure of any other historical reason. 16 x 20 is a 4 x 5 ratio and matches standard 8x10.ne_nau.gif
    Pathfinder - www.pathfinder.smugmug.com

    Moderator of the Technique Forum and Finishing School on Dgrin
  • AndyAndy Registered Users Posts: 50,016 Major grins
    edited January 24, 2005
    13x19 matte openings and frames for them
    mercphoto wrote:
    When I look at printers I'm surprised at the paper sizes they support. Letter-sized printers at 8.5x11" is obvious, though honestly I wish someone made an 8.5" by 12" paper so I could print 8x12's at home.

    But 13x19"? The largest standard frame that fits is 11x14. The 12x18 size is nice but odd. And you can't find a 13x19 frame (from what I can find). The next size up is 17x22, again an odd size. You can get a 16x20 (and without going borderless), but can't go 16x24.

    Is there a historical reason for these paper sizes?

    here's a good source for 13x19 mattes, frames
  • mercphotomercphoto Registered Users Posts: 4,550 Major grins
    edited January 24, 2005
    Ok, the size thing is making more sense. Now I'm looking at the Epson 2200, which accepts paper rolls. I thought this would be cheaper, but according to Epson website, the roll is not cheaper than cut sheets. Sometimes it is a big more expensive per foot. I'm guessing the benefit to roll paper is less waste?
    Bill Jurasz - Mercury Photography - Cedar Park, TX
    A former sports shooter
    Follow me at: https://www.flickr.com/photos/bjurasz/
    My Etsy store: https://www.etsy.com/shop/mercphoto?ref=hdr_shop_menu
  • AngeloAngelo Super Moderators Posts: 8,937 moderator
    edited February 1, 2005
    If you really want to know all about paper sizing go to: http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/iso-paper.html

    but I think you're really only interested in the best printer. I have an Epson Stylus / Photo 1270 which does a great job (although it's a bit older model). It feeds up to 13 x 19 paper which allows me to print graphics up to 11x17 (standard tabloid size) with room for a full trim to bleed. This means that if you want a finished product to fill a certain size, such as your 8x12s, you would need to load 8.5 x 14 (legal size), print and trim. This allows for the up to 1/2" margin most printers require for feed before laying down ink.

    mercphoto wrote:
    When I look at printers I'm surprised at the paper sizes they support. Letter-sized printers at 8.5x11" is obvious, though honestly I wish someone made an 8.5" by 12" paper so I could print 8x12's at home.

    But 13x19"? The largest standard frame that fits is 11x14. The 12x18 size is nice but odd. And you can't find a 13x19 frame (from what I can find). The next size up is 17x22, again an odd size. You can get a 16x20 (and without going borderless), but can't go 16x24.

    Is there a historical reason for these paper sizes?
  • mercphotomercphoto Registered Users Posts: 4,550 Major grins
    edited February 1, 2005
    Angelo wrote:
    If you really want to know all about paper sizing go to: http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/iso-paper.html

    That explains a ton! Thanks.

    If only we went metric... sigh.
    Bill Jurasz - Mercury Photography - Cedar Park, TX
    A former sports shooter
    Follow me at: https://www.flickr.com/photos/bjurasz/
    My Etsy store: https://www.etsy.com/shop/mercphoto?ref=hdr_shop_menu
  • GREAPERGREAPER Registered Users Posts: 3,113 Major grins
    edited February 1, 2005
    mercphoto wrote:
    Ok, the size thing is making more sense. Now I'm looking at the Epson 2200, which accepts paper rolls. I thought this would be cheaper, but according to Epson website, the roll is not cheaper than cut sheets. Sometimes it is a big more expensive per foot. I'm guessing the benefit to roll paper is less waste?

    Ya gotta have roll paper to print those LONG panos
Sign In or Register to comment.