Can this underexposed and noisy photo be saved? [solved]

urbanariesurbanaries Registered Users Posts: 2,690 Major grins
edited May 15, 2007 in Finishing School
I could not have screwed this one up more. Luckily before I got too far into the shoot, I realized I was in Manual with ISO 1600 but this was before that. As you can tell it's underexposed, and noisy as hell.

I do not currently have a noise reduction program and/ or I2e. I have read several threads on i2e and haven't read anything about its noise reduction.

Luckily, I shot in RAW. I currently edit using LR 1.0 and Photoshop CS2 on a PC. Here is the JPEG straight out of camera.

Any help or advice would be much appreciated. The non-group portions of the shoot went great, so I could re-shoot fairly easily, although I would rather avoid doing that to the client if possible.
137181665-L-1.jpg
Canon 5D MkI
50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.8, 24-70 2.8L, 35mm 1.4L, 135mm f2L
ST-E2 Transmitter + (3) 580 EXII + radio poppers

Comments

  • AndyAndy Registered Users Posts: 50,016 Major grins
    edited March 19, 2007
    Send me the raw file, I'll post it so folks can play with it!
    PM coming.
  • urbanariesurbanaries Registered Users Posts: 2,690 Major grins
    edited March 19, 2007
    Andy wrote:
    Send me the raw file, I'll post it so folks can play with it!
    PM coming.

    RAW file sent about 30 minutes ago, let me know if you didn't get it.

    Thanks Andy!
    Canon 5D MkI
    50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.8, 24-70 2.8L, 35mm 1.4L, 135mm f2L
    ST-E2 Transmitter + (3) 580 EXII + radio poppers
  • AndyAndy Registered Users Posts: 50,016 Major grins
    edited March 19, 2007
    Here is Lynne's Raw File.

    OK Team, let's see your best shot!
  • RogersDARogersDA Registered Users Posts: 3,502 Major grins
    edited March 19, 2007
    I tried - there's a lot of pixelating in the image so:


    137215568-L.jpg
  • Duffy PrattDuffy Pratt Registered Users Posts: 260 Major grins
    edited March 19, 2007
    I did this from the small JPG posted. First, curves in RBG to set white and black (white in boys shirt and black in man's shoes). Then a trip to CMYK to steepen the black curve and try to coax some detail in the cloth, and to get skin tones in something acceptable. That left the skin way too colorful, so I did a trip to LAB to bring down all the colors, and did Shadow/Highlights to darken the walll behind them (except around guy's head), and to get more detail in the pants.

    I''ll give the RAW a shot when I get a chance.

    Duffy
  • fehlingerfehlinger Registered Users Posts: 54 Big grins
    edited March 19, 2007
    I gave it a whirl. I think the noise is there to stay. Even after noiseninja its pretty bad. 4 x 6 should be ok though.

    small.jpg

    Link to full size
    Cary
    Indianapolis, Indiana
  • Jody MelansonJody Melanson Registered Users Posts: 416 Major grins
    edited March 19, 2007
    427280702_629be5c59f_o.jpg
    There is a fine line between a hobby and mental illness!
  • RogersDARogersDA Registered Users Posts: 3,502 Major grins
    edited March 19, 2007
    O.k., Jody. Tell me how you did it.

    Please.


    Pretty please.


    I'll be your friend.:D
  • urbanariesurbanaries Registered Users Posts: 2,690 Major grins
    edited March 19, 2007
    427280702_629be5c59f_o.jpg
    OMG Jody that is fantastic!!!! bowdown.gifbowbowdown.gifWhat on earth did you do? (and would you be willing to share your results?) Thanks everyone for working on this...I know the noise is terrible!
    Canon 5D MkI
    50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.8, 24-70 2.8L, 35mm 1.4L, 135mm f2L
    ST-E2 Transmitter + (3) 580 EXII + radio poppers
  • jayjay Registered Users Posts: 64 Big grins
    edited March 20, 2007
    heres my shot not as good as jodys though fixedpic.jpg
    jm photography
  • jayjay Registered Users Posts: 64 Big grins
    edited March 20, 2007
    heres a little filter effect and a overlay fixedpic-1.jpg
    jm photography
  • gusgus Registered Users Posts: 16,209 Major grins
    edited March 20, 2007
    137385637-L.jpg
  • gmonkehgmonkeh Registered Users Posts: 312 Major grins
    edited March 20, 2007
    Here's my go at it Lynn.....

    IMG_0030-1.jpg
    http://www.reverbphotography.com
    Nikon D300
    Nikkor 85mm f/1.8D
    Tamron 28-75 f/2.8
    Nikkor 80-200 AF-D ED f/2.8
    2 Alien Bees AB800
    Nikon Speedlight SB800
    Elinchrome Skyport Triggers
  • Mike LaneMike Lane Registered Users Posts: 7,106 Major grins
    edited March 20, 2007
    Here's my stab at it.

    137390127-L.jpg

    Click for link to O.
    Y'all don't want to hear me, you just want to dance.

    http://photos.mikelanestudios.com/
  • fehlingerfehlinger Registered Users Posts: 54 Big grins
    edited March 20, 2007
    urbanaries wrote:
    OMG Jody that is fantastic!!!! bowdown.gifbowbowdown.gifWhat on earth did you do? (and would you be willing to share your results?) Thanks everyone for working on this...I know the noise is terrible!

    Indeed, Jody! You are a true talent both behind the lens and behind the keyboard. I'd love to know how you salvaged all of that detail. Please, do tell! thumb.gif [hint]mini-tute?[/hint]

    BTW Jody, everytime I visit your site, I know I can write off the next hour or so!!! So many great shots. bowdown.gif
    Cary
    Indianapolis, Indiana
  • TentacionTentacion Registered Users Posts: 940 Major grins
    edited March 20, 2007
    Hi
    Hi, sorry if I interrupted, but I played with your pic, hope you don't mind...
    You're only as good as your next photo....
    One day, I started writing, not knowing that I had chained myself for life to a noble but merciless master. When God hands you a gift, he also hands you a whip; and the whip is intended solely for self-flagellation...I'm here alone in my dark madness, all by myself with my deck of cards --- and, of course, the whip God gave me." Truman Capote
  • KhaosKhaos Registered Users Posts: 2,435 Major grins
    edited March 20, 2007
    This will have a painting type look close up. I had to blend pixels to get the illusion of sharpness and also maintain color, light and shadow balance. At a distance it will look fine.

    137549576-L-1.jpg
  • urbanariesurbanaries Registered Users Posts: 2,690 Major grins
    edited March 21, 2007
    Khaos wrote:
    This will have a painting type look close up. I had to blend pixels to get the illusion of sharpness and also maintain color, light and shadow balance. At a distance it will look fine.

    Wow, so many great renditions, it's hard to pick one I like best! Keith, did you run a median filter and then an unsharp mask? I tried that a few different ways and got similar results to yours, just curiosu.

    Tentacion, your edit looks great too, it's small though so I can't see much detail.

    Again thanks everyone for taking on the challenge....awesome, awesome work!!!
    Canon 5D MkI
    50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.8, 24-70 2.8L, 35mm 1.4L, 135mm f2L
    ST-E2 Transmitter + (3) 580 EXII + radio poppers
  • heymarzheymarz Registered Users Posts: 10 Big grins
    edited March 21, 2007
    I'm still learning PS, so can't contribute much on the help side. What I wanted to ask all the PS wizards, is if you can remove the light reflection off of moms face in that pic to? I see most of you took the light beam out of the boys head but can you fix mom and if so how.
    THanks
  • sskoutassskoutas Registered Users Posts: 437 Major grins
    edited March 22, 2007
    Show-off!!

    :D:D:D
    427280702_629be5c59f_o.jpg
    __________________
    Stephen Skoutas
    http://stephenskoutas.com
    sskoutas@gmail.com Certe, toto, sentio nos in kansate non iam adesse

    Please feel free to retouch and repost my images. Critique, Suggestions, and Technique tips always welcomed.
  • RogersDARogersDA Registered Users Posts: 3,502 Major grins
    edited March 22, 2007
    heymarz wrote:
    I'm still learning PS, so can't contribute much on the help side. What I wanted to ask all the PS wizards, is if you can remove the light reflection off of moms face in that pic to? I see most of you took the light beam out of the boys head but can you fix mom and if so how.
    THanks

    Its so easy. First, in PS, duplicate the image layer. This is a good idea so that the original is not altered. You can always delete the duplicate later if you don't like it or if you really mess up.

    With the duplicated layer seletect Choose your "burn" tool. Its icon looks like pinching fingers.
    137872487-L.jpg
    Look at the options you have for the burn tool
    137872506-L.jpg

    For a quick toning down choose the Range as highlights. Choose a brush size and type appropriate for the area you are working in (zoom in on the area if needed). I typically use a soft brush so the edges a not harsh but rather faded when I paint with the tool. I also typically drop the exposure down a lot so that the burning is gradual. Each pass over the area will burn the area a little bit more.
  • KhaosKhaos Registered Users Posts: 2,435 Major grins
    edited March 23, 2007
    urbanaries wrote:
    Wow, so many great renditions, it's hard to pick one I like best! Keith, did you run a median filter and then an unsharp mask? I tried that a few different ways and got similar results to yours, just curiosu.

    Tentacion, your edit looks great too, it's small though so I can't see much detail.

    Again thanks everyone for taking on the challenge....awesome, awesome work!!!

    I have a lot of tools in my PS toolbox.

    Even though I use Noise Ninja, I still eliminate noise in RAW using the Luminance slider. I'm at work so I can't tell you exactly where it is, but you'll find it with a little searching.

    I use Pixel Genius for sharpening. I love that program.

    The rest was done in RAW with exposure, and LAB adjustements, along with some dodge work.

    You'll notice in my work I tend to have more contrast and a little less HDR when it doesn't help the primary subject. While I like what Jody did, the faces seem a little washed out at the expense of being able to see everything in the shot. It's a personal preference.
  • urbanariesurbanaries Registered Users Posts: 2,690 Major grins
    edited May 14, 2007
    Update...
    The clients finally placed an order, and ended up ordering the image Jody worked up, and it printed successfully, to client's satisfaction...clap.gifclap

    However, the only other shot they ordered, I wasn't so concerned about, and their 8x10 printed horribly. After seeing my own attempt at a rework, Andy says to refund their money...just wanted to make one last ditch effort before going black and white!

    original print (printed w/ Smugmug autocolor; final result was grainy and weird blue highlights in hair)
    137822559-S-3.jpg

    My rework (CS2 noise reduction, reset white and black points, and lowered red saturation)
    152598854-S.jpg

    Link to Original File:
    http://lynnehulbertphotography.smugmug.com/gallery/2847906#152653379

    any thoughts? (besides whipping me with a spiked noodle)
    Canon 5D MkI
    50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.8, 24-70 2.8L, 35mm 1.4L, 135mm f2L
    ST-E2 Transmitter + (3) 580 EXII + radio poppers
  • z_28z_28 Registered Users Posts: 956 Major grins
    edited May 14, 2007
    I know it's late but I can't resist to try :rutt

    urbanaries2.jpg
    D300, D70s, 10.5/2.8, 17-55/2.8, 24-85/2.8-4, 50/1.4, 70-200VR, 70-300VR, 60/2.8, SB800, SB80DX, SD8A, MB-D10 ...
    XTi, G9, 16-35/2.8L, 100-300USM, 70-200/4L, 19-35, 580EX II, CP-E3, 500/8 ...
    DSC-R1, HFL-F32X ... ; AG-DVX100B and stuff ... (I like this 10 years old signature :^)
  • z_28z_28 Registered Users Posts: 956 Major grins
    edited May 14, 2007
    urbanaries wrote:
    The clients finally placed an order, and ended up ordering the image Jody worked up, and it printed successfully, to client's satisfaction...clap.gifclap

    However, the only other shot they ordered, I wasn't so concerned about, and their 8x10 printed horribly. After seeing my own attempt at a rework, Andy says to refund their money...just wanted to make one last ditch effort before going black and white!

    original print (printed w/ Smugmug autocolor; final result was grainy and weird blue highlights in hair)
    137822559-S-3.jpg

    My rework (CS2 noise reduction, reset white and black points, and lowered red saturation)
    152598854-S.jpg

    Link to Original File:
    http://lynnehulbertphotography.smugmug.com/gallery/2847906#152653379

    any thoughts? (besides whipping me with a spiked noodle)

    And I still can't resist :D
    urbanaries4.jpg
    D300, D70s, 10.5/2.8, 17-55/2.8, 24-85/2.8-4, 50/1.4, 70-200VR, 70-300VR, 60/2.8, SB800, SB80DX, SD8A, MB-D10 ...
    XTi, G9, 16-35/2.8L, 100-300USM, 70-200/4L, 19-35, 580EX II, CP-E3, 500/8 ...
    DSC-R1, HFL-F32X ... ; AG-DVX100B and stuff ... (I like this 10 years old signature :^)
  • urbanariesurbanaries Registered Users Posts: 2,690 Major grins
    edited May 15, 2007
    z_28 wrote:
    And I still can't resist :D
    urbanaries4.jpg

    Wow, this looks great!! Thanks for taking the bait!! you did a miracle job on the skin tones, and preserved the shadow detail in the dark sweater, which I could not do at all. bowdown.gif

    Care to share your technique?
    Canon 5D MkI
    50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.8, 24-70 2.8L, 35mm 1.4L, 135mm f2L
    ST-E2 Transmitter + (3) 580 EXII + radio poppers
  • z_28z_28 Registered Users Posts: 956 Major grins
    edited May 15, 2007
    Not really a technique - rather simple hand and eyes job in CS2.
    I used probably everything from standard palette, no plug-ins, no actions,
    no automatic functions.
    Cropping, rotating, brightness, contrast, saturation, hand color balance,
    some shadow variations, some background remodelling rolleyes1.gif,
    sharpening twice, noise twice (both at different levels).
    One thing should be done here as I do on previous family portrait - removing sun line - on this one removing shadow.
    But it's time consuming process and I'm so lazy ne_nau.gif
    D300, D70s, 10.5/2.8, 17-55/2.8, 24-85/2.8-4, 50/1.4, 70-200VR, 70-300VR, 60/2.8, SB800, SB80DX, SD8A, MB-D10 ...
    XTi, G9, 16-35/2.8L, 100-300USM, 70-200/4L, 19-35, 580EX II, CP-E3, 500/8 ...
    DSC-R1, HFL-F32X ... ; AG-DVX100B and stuff ... (I like this 10 years old signature :^)
  • z_28z_28 Registered Users Posts: 956 Major grins
    edited May 15, 2007
    As you wish B&W and doctored a bit more :D
    urbanaries5agfapan100.jpg
    D300, D70s, 10.5/2.8, 17-55/2.8, 24-85/2.8-4, 50/1.4, 70-200VR, 70-300VR, 60/2.8, SB800, SB80DX, SD8A, MB-D10 ...
    XTi, G9, 16-35/2.8L, 100-300USM, 70-200/4L, 19-35, 580EX II, CP-E3, 500/8 ...
    DSC-R1, HFL-F32X ... ; AG-DVX100B and stuff ... (I like this 10 years old signature :^)
  • urbanariesurbanaries Registered Users Posts: 2,690 Major grins
    edited May 15, 2007
    z_28 wrote:
    Not really a technique - rather simple hand and eyes job in CS2.
    I used probably everything from standard palette, no plug-ins, no actions,
    no automatic functions.
    Cropping, rotating, brightness, contrast, saturation, hand color balance,
    some shadow variations, some background remodelling rolleyes1.gif,
    sharpening twice, noise twice (both at different levels).
    One thing should be done here as I do on previous family portrait - removing sun line - on this one removing shadow.
    But it's time consuming process and I'm so lazy ne_nau.gif

    I'm not so concerned about the sun shadow, its not intended to be a pristine studio backdrop...

    the skin tones however were of major concern, and you did a great job. I used most of what you referred to in your explanation but as you know the various settings and order yields an infinite range of results!

    I appreciate your taking a stab at the image, you clearly have improved upon my original foible. In the interest of time, I think I probably should convert to black and white for the client.
    Canon 5D MkI
    50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.8, 24-70 2.8L, 35mm 1.4L, 135mm f2L
    ST-E2 Transmitter + (3) 580 EXII + radio poppers
Sign In or Register to comment.