First day with the new 300 IS L 2.8

BBonesBBones Registered Users Posts: 580 Major grins
edited March 24, 2007 in Sports
Loving this lens...but damn it weighs a lot after holding it all day

137756398-O.jpg

137759244-O.jpg

137778499-O.jpg

137787098-O.jpg

Comments

  • saurorasaurora Registered Users Posts: 4,320 Major grins
    edited March 23, 2007
    Looks like it's worth it's weight in gold to me! Images just pop off the page...better keep it! :D
  • SkippySkippy Registered Users Posts: 12,075 Major grins
    edited March 23, 2007
    BBones wrote:
    Loving this lens...but damn it weighs a lot after holding it all day

    Wow, those are realllllllllllllll nice nod.gif
    The 70-200 is quite a weight too, so I know what your talking about.
    The 400mm Prime is like half the weight of the 70-200.

    The images look great Bones thumb.gif very impressive......... Skippy
    .
    .
    Skippy (Australia) - Moderator of "HOLY MACRO" and "OTHER COOL SHOTS"

    ALBUM http://ozzieskip.smugmug.com/

    :skippy Everyone has the right to be stupid, but some people just abuse the privilege :dgrin
  • fmkjrfmkjr Registered Users Posts: 85 Big grins
    edited March 23, 2007
    Outstanding shots!
    Very clear pictures. As stated by saurora, the images "pop off the page"!
    frank
    dr.Frank

    The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork. Psalms 19:1
    We now need to not destroy it and capture its beauty for all to behold.

    http://www.kendralla.com
  • BBonesBBones Registered Users Posts: 580 Major grins
    edited March 23, 2007
    I used the 70-200 IS L 2.8 all last season and got used to the weight of it, no big deal after a while. This thing is totally different and after 8 hours my wrist was shaking. Definately need to do some working out.

    Kart racing and Super Motard practice this weekend and another track day on Friday before it is "show time" with the first local race of the season. Hopefully I learn a trick or muscle up in time otherwise on April 2nd after all that use my left arm will be rubber.
  • TristanPTristanP Registered Users Posts: 1,107 Major grins
    edited March 23, 2007
    Nice pics. Do you think the size and weight of the 2.8 version are worth it compared to the 300/4 IS?
    panekfamily.smugmug.com (personal)
    tristansphotography.com (motorsports)

    Canon 20D | 10-22 | 17-85 IS | 50/1.4 | 70-300 IS | 100/2.8 macro
    Sony F717 | Hoya R72
  • DavidTODavidTO Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 19,160 Major grins
    edited March 23, 2007
    Very nice. Beautiful. I'd love to have that lens.
    Moderator Emeritus
    Dgrin FAQ | Me | Workshops
  • mercphotomercphoto Registered Users Posts: 4,550 Major grins
    edited March 23, 2007
    BBones wrote:
    I used the 70-200 IS L 2.8 all last season and got used to the weight of it, no big deal after a while. This thing is totally different and after 8 hours my wrist was shaking. Definately need to do some working out.

    Kart racing and Super Motard practice this weekend and another track day on Friday before it is "show time" with the first local race of the season. Hopefully I learn a trick or muscle up in time otherwise on April 2nd after all that use my left arm will be rubber.
    It is a great lens. I found it hard to use in a strong wind though. The "trick" to using a lens this heavy and big is making sure you don't use the wrong muscles. If you get your deltoids involved you will tire out very rapidly as these are small muscles. Make sure you are not scrunching up your shoulders to support the lens. Shoulders down and back in a neutral place. Use only your arms. As per wrist get in the habit of doing wrist curls.
    Bill Jurasz - Mercury Photography - Cedar Park, TX
    A former sports shooter
    Follow me at: https://www.flickr.com/photos/bjurasz/
    My Etsy store: https://www.etsy.com/shop/mercphoto?ref=hdr_shop_menu
  • BBonesBBones Registered Users Posts: 580 Major grins
    edited March 23, 2007
    I don't know if it is comparable to the 300 f4 since I never used it. I went with the 2.8 due to the rave reviews and so I could connect my 1.4x TC to it to get me some more length. The 400 IS L 2.8 is impossible to hand hold over a duration and nearly double the price.
  • SeamusSeamus Registered Users Posts: 1,573 Major grins
    edited March 23, 2007
    it's a great lens and the 2x extender works well with it also. enjoy it thumb.gif
  • F45F45 Registered Users Posts: 225 Major grins
    edited March 24, 2007
    Beautiful images Brandon and a beautiful lens!

    I use the 400 2.8 with and without a 2x tele and with and without a monopod. Very heavy but after several hours everything else feels like a toy in comparison. Definately worth the effort thumb.gif
    Cheers,

    Chris Sedg. :cool
    www.christophersedgwick.com

  • ian408ian408 Administrators Posts: 21,942 moderator
    edited March 24, 2007
    It's a nice won lens? Yeah?
    Moderator Journeys/Sports/Big Picture :: Need some help with dgrin?
Sign In or Register to comment.