Two ideas for #2
photogmomma
Registered Users Posts: 1,644 Major grins
First of all, I'm not super happy with these photos and I knew that I wouldn't be, but wanted to see if they might work if redone....
Comments? Please be brutal! If retaken, could these work?
(I know about the watermark.... )
Comments? Please be brutal! If retaken, could these work?
(I know about the watermark.... )
0
Comments
Thanks so much! I'm thinking of redoing it with different lighting... I'm wondering if catching the sun setting on mountain would give it more strength....
Thanks again!
www.tippiepics.com
This issue of taking a photo of something humble and having it be the prominent figure or focus in the photo does bring up a conflict of sorts...how does it say humble if it is the focus of so much attention?? But, I think some things are just inately humble, and focusing in on them does not necessarily detract from their humbleness.
In some ways, I can see how your photo could be saying stately as well...the mountain and surroundings are stately and certainly don't call for a traditionally stately church - this one fits the environment. And the perfectly straight cross on the top and the crosses on the tightly buttoned up doors give an air of "country stately." The church may read as more humble if one of the doors was ajar and/or hanging crookedly or something.
OK...enough rambling from me. I like the pic!
Elaine
Comments and constructive critique always welcome!
Elaine Heasley Photography
I thought of trying to get further away (I couldn't at that time because of my daughters melting down), but I kind of liked how the humble church took on a stately feel when given a similar "weight" as the mountain. Almost a dual view of the same thing.
I am going to try to retake this from further away using a telephoto, but I'm not sure I'll be able to with the lay of the land as it is. I could definitely get further, but because of how it slopes, it may be too low and the church won't be below the top of the mountain as I think it should be. But maybe I can stand on the beater land cruiser and take it?
Anyway, my original thought was "We are all humble in the end" (hence the first photo), but I couldn't get far enough away to convey that feel. I also didn't have time to walk around and try a lot of shots... Then the small chapel struck me.
I'll go back and see what I can do when the weather isn't so grey - or the sky so bland.
Thanks a lot for your "ramblings"! They helped me a lot! It was nice to know that someone else was seeing it as I was intending.
Oh, and I doubt they'd appreciate me pulling the door partially off the hinges! ! This is still in use. But I don't know if it'll open. Hmmm....
www.tippiepics.com
Well said....I really like that they are almost the same size in this shot....there is greatness in being humble.
Thanks again!
www.tippiepics.com
www.tippiepics.com
Good thinking! That's what I did too. No matter what, I think you got a keeper.
Elaine
Comments and constructive critique always welcome!
Elaine Heasley Photography
! I can't tell you how many times I waited to post that "right" photo and then forgot... And the old photo would have been at least good and I got it in. !
Thanks for the kind words!!
www.tippiepics.com
I see you've got it entered....so by me saying, "Hey Andi, enter this one" isn't going to amount to a hill of beans! Nice shot.
NAPP Member | Canon Shooter
Weddings/Portraits and anything else that catches my eye.
www.daveswartz.com
Model Mayhem site http://www.modelmayhem.com/686552
D
Thanks!
www.tippiepics.com
What he said.
Basking in the shadows of yesterday's triumphs'.
It could be just me, but could it use a very very slight rotate counter clockwise? (VERY slight)
Creativity is allowing yourself to make mistakes. Art is knowing which ones to keep.
The Dang Gallery on DangRabbit - Follow me on Twitter or on Facebook
Leica M8: Zeiss 35mm f/2 Biogon and 50mm f/2 Planar; Voigtlander 15mm f/4.5, 50mm f/1.5 Nokton and 75mm f/2.5 Heliar
Olympus E-P1: Zuiko 14-42 and 25mm f/2.8 Pancake; Panasonic 45-200mm and 20mm f/1.7; and M-to-m4/3 adaptor
Olympus e620: Zuiko 14-54 f/2.8-3.5