2 4 #3
System
Registered Users Posts: 8,186 moderator
Hellmet
Amtrak
Amtrak
? 11 votes
Hellmet
72%
8 votes
Amtrak
27%
3 votes
0
Comments
http://photos.mikelanestudios.com/
The rest is too busy and distracting. How bout a crop maybe or reshoot. I like the idea but it's not quite there (at least for me).
NAPP Member | Canon Shooter
Weddings/Portraits and anything else that catches my eye.
www.daveswartz.com
Model Mayhem site http://www.modelmayhem.com/686552
IMO neither are very competitive.
50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.8, 24-70 2.8L, 35mm 1.4L, 135mm f2L
ST-E2 Transmitter + (3) 580 EXII + radio poppers
I can live with that. Not sure I'll have time to shoot again before monday though. Friggin' wedding shower this weekend.
A lil' blur for dof.
that helps. not sure if its your watermark now or the askew bus sign that are confusing my eye.
what's it look like in color? there's a lot of graphical highlights/ repetition going on. color may delineate the elements enough?
i love the concept, somethings just "meh."
50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.8, 24-70 2.8L, 35mm 1.4L, 135mm f2L
ST-E2 Transmitter + (3) 580 EXII + radio poppers
Shot this today and it's a right up the gut take on the theme. It just doesn't speak to me the way the woman in the helmet does. There's such a sadess in her situation. Maybe it's that I see here in her helmet every day. I dunno. It's a dark and gritty image that does not scream at the theme. That's more my style. I've entered the ties but knowing me I'll swap em out for the woman and lose.
dak.smugmug.com
I know you are not one to shy away from controversial topics, but personally I don't find that this photo by itself brings up the question of what is regular and irregular in the spectrum of humanity. It is only by entering it in a competition with the theme "irregular" that those issues come up. Your ties shot expresses irregular by doing two things: it first sets the standard for the regular by showing the racks of ties all tucked in; then it features the irregular by centernig the one which is hanging loose. The "Helmet" shot shows only one person. For her to appear irregular she must break the pattern of a pre-conceived notion of the regular. Some people, who share that implied notion of the regular will get it; other people who don't, won't.
Liquid ~ I'm not sure what her disability is but I'm pretty certain it's mental adn not physical. The iregularity in my virew was in her though process or choice to wear a motorcyle helmet every day. I suppose you could be correct but she gets around pretty good. Her real tick is that she's always writing on this tiny notepad. I also don't think irregular carries the negative conotation you seem to feel from it. Perhaps that's due to your sister-in-law's condition, perhaps it's something larger in our society, but to me it simply means outside of the dominant paradigm. To me that's usually a good thing. I know I'd hate be seen as regular. Picturesque on the other hand I could live with.
It is one thing to choose to live outside. It is another entirely to be forced to. To me, there is a great difference between a photo that says "look at me, I am not like you/them" and a photo that says "look a her, she is not like us." A subtle distinction maybe but at least to me it is important. While is it certainly possible to take a photograph that coveys irregular by showing someone unconstrained by the ball and chain of convention, personally I don't get that message from this photo. To me she looks like someone who's situation has taken many choices away from her and who's difference has made her less free rather than more free. I could easily be completely wrong about her actual situation but that is what I see in this particular shot.