bag decisions - Mini Trekker?
Elaine
Registered Users Posts: 3,532 Major grins
As much as I'd like a Crumpler, the budget is making me decide between the Lowepro Mini Trekker and the Lowepro Slingshot 200. I'm leaning towards the Mini, just because it looks like it would hold all my current gear plus some future gear. The Slingshot looks like a good idea, but I wonder if it's really that comfortable (or more comfortable than the Mini) wearing it most of a day? Anybody ever used/tried both?
Elaine
Elaine
0
Comments
Hi Elaine,
I have the smaller Slingshot (100?). I took it with me on my trip to Africa and found that it was comfortable to carry. The ability to access the camera compartment without having to take it off was great. And I found it very comfortable to carry as a sling.
The only problem that I have with my Slingshot is it's size. I like the smaller size for the way that it fits, however it's very limiting in how many lenses you can carry. Basically, it's good for a day trip where you will only be bringing one or two extra lenses (depending on the lens size). I have a Canon 30D and a variety of lenses and had to do some very creative packing to get everything to fit. I also had to pull out most of the compartment pieces that were included since they were stiff and took up much of the precious room. I ended up using some strips of polar fleece to wrap around and cushion my equipment.
The larger sized sling would probably answer some of the storage size problems - but then the question of wearability arises. You'll probably only be able to judge by trying it on.
Mary
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
That's good to know, Mary! And I think you're right...I need to try one on.
Elaine
Comments and constructive critique always welcome!
Elaine Heasley Photography
I have one DSLR body and 5 lenses (smallest is the 50mm f/1.7 and the largest is a 70-210 f/4 tank), although I usually only carry 4 of them...the 5th one is a kit lens and even though it's my widest at 18mm, I usually use the 28-75 f/2.8 instead. I hope to get a flash, wide angle and a longer zoom someday. Then, of course, there is the extra battery and charger, a filter wallet, memory cards, etc... I'm hoping there's a bit of extra space to use for things like my glasses and wallet. I'm pretty sure all this will fit in the mini, now it's just a matter of wanting to wear the thing all day!
Elaine
Comments and constructive critique always welcome!
Elaine Heasley Photography
Do you think that the larger one would become too cumbersome for the "slingshot" style to be effective (too heavy for one shoulder, too large to swing around your body)? That was my concern with going larger than the 200. Hopefully, tomorrow I'll get to go look at one in person.
The e-bay seller you mentioned was the one that I was looking at for both styles of bags.
Elaine
Comments and constructive critique always welcome!
Elaine Heasley Photography
My photos
"The future is an illusion, but a damned handy one." - David Allen
I'm willing to hear more about the Crumpler bag. To be honest, I wasn't even considering a Crumpler that wasn't more of a back-pack style. I traveled for three weeks in Japan a few years ago, carrying a small shoulder type bag stuffed with my travel guide, water, P&S camera and film, journal, etc...and it just about killed me. I sooo wished I had a backpack instead! Are the Crumpler bags meant to be worn across the body like messenger bags? I can't tell from their website.
Comments and constructive critique always welcome!
Elaine Heasley Photography
I am not a big fan of Crumpler..I mean they do have the coolness factor but woopee.
Fred
http://www.facebook.com/Riverbendphotos
I've never tried a slingshot, so I don't know if it's better than the average shoulder bag. But I have walked around with a shoulder bag and a heavy pro body with three lenses, and like you, had a rough time of it.
The upside to a backpack is comfort. The downside is easy access.
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
Thanks, Fred! Great, detailed review you did there. Now I know for sure I would want the Mini, rather than the Micro, which I looked at on-line today. I don't want to fill up a new bag as soon as I get it!
Elaine
Comments and constructive critique always welcome!
Elaine Heasley Photography
Yep, your life will be complete once you own this bag.
It's a bargain!
Thanks! But...that's a little more bag than I need, and it's out of my budget. Sorry!
E
Comments and constructive critique always welcome!
Elaine Heasley Photography
It is barely big enough for what you are going to carry but does not allow you the room to grow and to me it is not very comfortable and doesn't have much room for additional things- snacks- jacket- etc.
I have learned- buy more than what you need right now because you are going to get more stuff. Made that mistake with the backpack and the shoulder bag- looking for bigger ones of each.
Aaron
Aaron Newman
Website:www.CapturingLightandEmotion.com
Facebook: Capturing Light and Emotion
I own and use both a MINI TREKKER CLASSIC and a SLINGSHOT 100. I Find uses for both. I must say a prefer the feel of the Slingshot went totin' gear allot more and find the convenience of instant access to camera HUGE when traveling. Now, you will have to take it off your person to access much of your gear anyway, so that usefulness only really works when you have the lens you'll be using primarily mounted to body and the second most used in the top compartment. I took this pack for two weeks across Europe and loved it. Again this is the 100 and here's what i stuffed in it:
1 D70 w/18-70 mounted
1 D100 w/vert grip (no lens attached)
1 SB-600
1 50mm f/1.8
1 70-300 VR
2 extra batteries
Cards, remote, etc.
Downfall of design. After long hikes you'll start leaning to the side, it's hard on one shoulder. Easy fix --> sling another bag, purse, etc across the other shoulder to balance you out. In my case i took Lowepro's Utility Case with another lens 60mm Macro and Cokin Filter Stuffs. I could even get it to "hang" below the 100 on my back. Another benefit, you can fit a monopod in the Slip Lock loop on the side!!
Okay, for the Mini Trekker Classic
I fit
D70, D100, N90s, SB-800, SB-600, 50mm, 18-70mm, 70-300, 80-200 f/2.8, 60mm Macro filters, card cases, battery cases and testers, small roof prism binocs, and even my Camera Flip Stroboframe in the front pocket, i'm forgettin stuff too i'm sure, but it is stuffed.
Downfall, It's really friggin' heavy with all that gear and i've pretty much worn down the padding in the shoulder straps.
Hope that helps!
cheers,
paul
The bottom line is that if function is more important than form, you're better off with Lowepro.
Cheers,
-joel
Link to my Smugmug site
http://www.jonathanswinton.com
http://www.swintoncounseling.com