Assignment #32: Save your worst shot

13

Comments

  • NikolaiNikolai Registered Users Posts: 19,035 Major grins
    edited April 25, 2007
    David,
    RogersDA wrote:
    Well, Nik, since I inspired you to do this assignment I guess I might as well participate. No "smilies" today. But, how's this go?

    A lot of clone/heal brushing to remove the dirt, bad spots, fuzzies, etc. Extracted the flower and added a filter (angled strokes) and a light render effect. Merged layers and ran a softness action. The second adds some more lighting, a gradient map layer, and a curves layer.

    I like the treatment, esp. the last one, but I really can't see your original as a bad, let alone B.A.D, image... eek7.gif
    "May the f/stop be with you!"
  • RogersDARogersDA Registered Users Posts: 3,502 Major grins
    edited April 25, 2007
    Nikolai wrote:
    ...but I really can't see your original as a bad, let alone B.A.D, image... eek7.gif

    Geeez...It's hard to suck sometimes!!
  • NikolaiNikolai Registered Users Posts: 19,035 Major grins
    edited April 26, 2007
    RogersDA wrote:
    Geeez...It's hard to suck sometimes!!
    That's why for this WA you don't have to use a fresh shot, only a fresh treatment... Dig out your backup CDs, don't you have ANY garbage there? mwink.gif
    "May the f/stop be with you!"
  • seekerseeker Registered Users Posts: 116 Major grins
    edited April 26, 2007
    Define "fresh treatment" for me :)
    Nikolai wrote:
    That's why for this WA you don't have to use a fresh shot, only a fresh treatment... Dig out your backup CDs, don't you have ANY garbage there? mwink.gif

    This may be asking a silly question, but I want to make sure I understand the spirit of the rule, not just the letter.

    I have a picture I shot back at Christmas, that I applied a fix to soon after the fact. I would love to go back and apply a different fix to it, and post it here, but I am not sure whether that fits within the spirit of what you are asking us to do.

    Could you clarify this for me?

    Thanks!

    - Brian
  • pyroPrints.compyroPrints.com Registered Users Posts: 1,383 Major grins
    edited April 26, 2007
    seeker wrote:
    This may be asking a silly question, but I want to make sure I understand the spirit of the rule, not just the letter.

    I have a picture I shot back at Christmas, that I applied a fix to soon after the fact. I would love to go back and apply a different fix to it, and post it here, but I am not sure whether that fits within the spirit of what you are asking us to do.

    Could you clarify this for me?

    Thanks!

    - Brian

    I think it would if you're applying the fix to the orgiinal image. Unless your original fix was bad mwink.gif
    pyroPrints.com (my little t-shirt shop)
    pyroPrints.com/5819572 The Photo Section
  • NikolaiNikolai Registered Users Posts: 19,035 Major grins
    edited April 26, 2007
    Brian,
    seeker wrote:
    This may be asking a silly question, but I want to make sure I understand the spirit of the rule, not just the letter.

    I have a picture I shot back at Christmas, that I applied a fix to soon after the fact. I would love to go back and apply a different fix to it, and post it here, but I am not sure whether that fits within the spirit of what you are asking us to do.

    Could you clarify this for me?

    Thanks!

    - Brian

    "Fresh" simply means "done now, after the particular subject was announced".
    In most cases I ask for "fresh pictures", i.e. they should be taken now, not 6 months ago.
    Since this one is mostly pp assingment, I decided to allow older pictures but the post processing should be performed now.
    The idea is also to look back at your own work and see whether you have improved and, heck, maybe even bring the new life to some of those rookie pictures one's taken a few years back mwink.gif

    HTH
    "May the f/stop be with you!"
  • RogersDARogersDA Registered Users Posts: 3,502 Major grins
    edited April 26, 2007
    Nikolai wrote:
    That's why for this WA you don't have to use a fresh shot, only a fresh treatment... Dig out your backup CDs, don't you have ANY garbage there? mwink.gif

    O.k. I can't call this "garbage" as it is my daughter. Shot when she was but 1 day old with a Sony Mavixa with a flash that didn't work. Aside: that evenually led me to go with the 20D.
    147132783-L.jpg

    147132720-L.jpg

    duplicating layer - blured - hide all mask and painting to reveal only the slightly blurred face
    coloring of the face and burning in the hair. Ran it though an action for "dreamy" type of effect -very slight convert using this
    I2E for some skin tone correction - i still suck at sking tones.
  • NikolaiNikolai Registered Users Posts: 19,035 Major grins
    edited April 26, 2007
    RogersDA wrote:
    O.k. I can't call this "garbage" as it is my daughter. Shot when she was but 1 day old with a Sony Mavixa with a flash that didn't work. Aside: that evenually led me to go with the 20D.
    ---
    duplicating layer - blured - hide all mask and painting to reveal only the slightly blurred face
    coloring of the face and burning in the hair. Ran it though an action for "dreamy" type of effect -very slight convert using this
    I2E for some skin tone correction - i still suck at sking tones.
    I agree, original is not too bad under the circumtances, yet I like the treatment:-) thumb.gif
    "May the f/stop be with you!"
  • seekerseeker Registered Users Posts: 116 Major grins
    edited April 26, 2007
    Gazing Girl - before and after
    This is a shot I took last Christmas at a family gathering.

    Here is the "before" image:

    147170219-L.jpg

    This has lots of problems :D

    - out of focus
    - white balance not correct
    - poor composition
    - not a good mix of colors

    Here is what I did to fix it:

    - Auto-levels in Photoshop
    - Converted to Black and White using a Gradient and the Channel Mixer to deal with color problems
    - Cropped and painted out the switch plate to deal with bad composition
    - Applied the "Dry Brush" fillter to deal with the focus problem
    - Applied a duo-tone to make it more interesting

    Here is the "after" image:

    147170267-L.jpg

    - Brian
  • NikolaiNikolai Registered Users Posts: 19,035 Major grins
    edited April 26, 2007
    seeker wrote:
    This is a shot I took last Christmas at a family gathering.
    Here is the "before" image:
    Here is the "after" image:
    - Brian

    Brian,
    in this assignment we're not looking for a mild improvement of a sub-par photo. We're looking for turning a total trash into wall-worthy material. In your case I can't see either...ne_nau.gif
    "May the f/stop be with you!"
  • richterslrichtersl Registered Users Posts: 3,322 Major grins
    edited April 26, 2007
    Thought I'd try again
    Original stinky photo:

    147182184-M.jpg



    Revision:

    147182174-L.jpg
  • NikolaiNikolai Registered Users Posts: 19,035 Major grins
    edited April 26, 2007
    Linda,
    richtersl wrote:
    Original stinky photo:
    Revision:

    Nice! Crop, liquify, grangy bw - WTG!thumb.gif
    "May the f/stop be with you!"
  • seekerseeker Registered Users Posts: 116 Major grins
    edited April 26, 2007
    Nikolai wrote:
    Brian,
    in this assignment we're not looking for a mild improvement of a sub-par photo. We're looking for turning a total trash into wall-worthy material. In your case I can't see either...ne_nau.gif

    Apparently you think more highly of my original than I do.

    Oh well! headscratch.gif

    - Brian
  • SDJamesSDJames Registered Users Posts: 91 Big grins
    edited April 26, 2007
    Challenging Post Proc
    Before...
    147230299-M.jpg
    after...
    147230302-M.jpg
    Talented Post Proc, eh? rolleyes1.gifrolleyes1.gif
    Couldn't resist.mwink.gif
    40D, 400 f5.6L, 70-200 f2.8L, 50 f1.8, Tam 17-50 f2.8
  • SDJamesSDJames Registered Users Posts: 91 Big grins
    edited April 26, 2007
    ...on a more serious note
    Tough finding recent pics I haven't deleted. How about...
    before...
    147240489-M.jpg
    and after...
    147240486-M.jpg
    since it was already blurred, I added some smart blur to hide the fence a little. Then, I added the radial blur from the center of the torches.
    Eh, not my best before/after. I'll have to see what else I can dig up.
    40D, 400 f5.6L, 70-200 f2.8L, 50 f1.8, Tam 17-50 f2.8
  • NikolaiNikolai Registered Users Posts: 19,035 Major grins
    edited April 27, 2007
    SDJames wrote:
    Tough finding recent pics I haven't deleted. How about...
    before...
    and after...
    since it was already blurred, I added some smart blur to hide the fence a little. Then, I added the radial blur from the center of the torches.
    Eh, not my best before/after. I'll have to see what else I can dig up.
    I like the direction you're going. thumb.gif And yes, I think too, more can be done to it deal.gif
    "May the f/stop be with you!"
  • pyroPrints.compyroPrints.com Registered Users Posts: 1,383 Major grins
    edited April 27, 2007
    Hey Nik, i just had a semi-brilliant idea. You should grab some of your old bad shots, and then ppl can choose one they like and try to fix it =c)
    pyroPrints.com (my little t-shirt shop)
    pyroPrints.com/5819572 The Photo Section
  • NikolaiNikolai Registered Users Posts: 19,035 Major grins
    edited April 27, 2007
    Hey Nik, i just had a semi-brilliant idea. You should grab some of your old bad shots, and then ppl can choose one they like and try to fix it =c)

    You want ME to be an everybody's scapegoat? mwink.gif I'll pass, thanks... rolleyes1.gif

    The thing is - it's gotta be your own shot for this thing to work. Why? Because of the mental reservation. Manglingh somebody else's work is always easy. But your won - you always have some extra memories associated with it, so you always "see" what others may (and often do) not. You need to learn to block this feelings, look at the shot AS IF it was somebody else's.
    Anyway, it's Friday, time for the new theme!
    "May the f/stop be with you!"
  • SwartzySwartzy Registered Users Posts: 3,293 Major grins
    edited April 30, 2007
    Just for you Nik
    My classic WA 32 material rolleyes1.gif

    147163712-L.jpg

    148399670-L.jpg
    Swartzy:
    NAPP Member | Canon Shooter
    Weddings/Portraits and anything else that catches my eye.
    www.daveswartz.com
    Model Mayhem site http://www.modelmayhem.com/686552
  • NikolaiNikolai Registered Users Posts: 19,035 Major grins
    edited April 30, 2007
    Swartzy wrote:
    My classic WA 32 material rolleyes1.gif

    lol3.gif
    I knew it woud come back and bite me in the a...trunk...:-)

    Good job on the treatment! thumb.gif
    "May the f/stop be with you!"
  • pyroPrints.compyroPrints.com Registered Users Posts: 1,383 Major grins
    edited April 30, 2007
    Swartzy wrote:
    My classic WA 32 material rolleyes1.gif

    OK, someone has to explain to me what the assignment on Week 32 was... eek7.gif
    pyroPrints.com (my little t-shirt shop)
    pyroPrints.com/5819572 The Photo Section
  • RogersDARogersDA Registered Users Posts: 3,502 Major grins
    edited May 1, 2007
    OK, someone has to explain to me what the assignment on Week 32 was... eek7.gif

    You're reading itdeal.gifD:D
  • leaforteleaforte Registered Users Posts: 1,948 Major grins
    edited July 16, 2007
    Worse Shot
    Playing Catch Up

    I took alot of pictures on my last hike, and thought this picture of a root and water element would come out nice. It was a beautiful feature. But alas, it just wasn't the same when I got it home, and turned out to be the worse of the bunch. It just wasn't the same without the whole tree. But it looked so nice in real time, that I wanted to salvage a piece of it, and thus tried this crop, and BW conversion.

    Original as shot

    173480247-L.jpg

    The cropped version

    173480276-L.jpg

    I'm not real experienced with the nuances of curves and levels, but my fixes should get better with practice.
    Growing with Dgrin



  • NikolaiNikolai Registered Users Posts: 19,035 Major grins
    edited July 16, 2007
    leaforte wrote:
    Playing Catch Up

    I took alot of pictures on my last hike, and thought this picture of a root and water element would come out nice. It was a beautiful feature. But alas, it just wasn't the same when I got it home, and turned out to be the worse of the bunch. It just wasn't the same without the whole tree. But it looked so nice in real time, that I wanted to salvage a piece of it, and thus tried this crop, and BW conversion.

    I'm not real experienced with the nuances of curves and levels, but my fixes should get better with practice.

    It's a nice crop and conversion, but it seems that even your original wasn't that bad mwink.gif
    "May the f/stop be with you!"
  • emmalouemmalou Registered Users Posts: 412 Major grins
    edited July 19, 2007
    The original photo

    bull.jpg

    The new photo.......
    cropcrosshatch.jpg
  • NikolaiNikolai Registered Users Posts: 19,035 Major grins
    edited July 19, 2007
    Emma,
    emmalou wrote:
    The original photo
    The new photo.......

    Thank you for playing!
    However,
    1. First shot is not nearly bad enough, many of us would be thrilled to take it just as it is.
    2. Second image is not that much different. ne_nau.gif
    Please remember, this assignment is not about a slight improvement. deal.gif
    It's about turning the a Pauper into a Prince, an Ugly Duckling into a Swan and a Beast into a Beauty.

    Let's try again, shall we? mwink.gif
    "May the f/stop be with you!"
  • emmalouemmalou Registered Users Posts: 412 Major grins
    edited July 19, 2007
    Lol.ok........I had a feeling .
    Editing for a new try...
    eld.jpg Pretty much blown , alot of noise?
    More detail , cropped and darkened the blown areas........I hope........
    posteredge.jpg
  • NikolaiNikolai Registered Users Posts: 19,035 Major grins
    edited July 19, 2007
    emmalou wrote:
    Lol.ok........I had a feeling .
    Editing for a new try...
    Pretty much blown , alot of noise?
    More detail , cropped and darkened the blown areas........I hope........
    I think this one is a bit better. But you apparently have a much higher standard, since I noticed neither noise nor blownout areas (at least in IE).
    I like the new crop though.
    "May the f/stop be with you!"
  • emmalouemmalou Registered Users Posts: 412 Major grins
    edited July 19, 2007
    Nikolai wrote:
    I think this one is a bit better. But you apparently have a much higher standard, since I noticed neither noise nor blownout areas (at least in IE).
    I like the new crop though.
    Higher standards.....not even close.....lol.but on my screen the left side is really glaring, as well as the doorway on the shed, and the blue pool to the right side.....
  • MarkRMarkR Registered Users Posts: 2,099 Major grins
    edited July 22, 2007
    Have you looked at this site?
    www.deletedimages.com
    It's similar to this challenge, except for the whole "try to make something new out of a bad shot" part. Taken out of context, some (many) of the deleted images are wicked cool.
Sign In or Register to comment.