At it again #4
Swartzy
Registered Users Posts: 3,293 Major grins
Geez, can't say I've ever had this much difficulty....well....what about this?
HARMONY IN THE KITCHEN
HARMONY IN THE KITCHEN
Swartzy:
NAPP Member | Canon Shooter
Weddings/Portraits and anything else that catches my eye.
www.daveswartz.com
Model Mayhem site http://www.modelmayhem.com/686552
NAPP Member | Canon Shooter
Weddings/Portraits and anything else that catches my eye.
www.daveswartz.com
Model Mayhem site http://www.modelmayhem.com/686552
0
Comments
This shot really needs lower key light and a spot light on the conductor. If you manage to reproduce stage lighting your story will be much stronger.
Yes, spice jars wearing tuxes. Yes, I have many shots that look the way you suggest.....I'm working on them now for the right flavor of light. So often others say, "oh, that's underexposed" but I think in this case it's the "Diva" spice, Coriander, who should take up the spot light!
NAPP Member | Canon Shooter
Weddings/Portraits and anything else that catches my eye.
www.daveswartz.com
Model Mayhem site http://www.modelmayhem.com/686552
Putting the spot on Coriander should keep the shot from looking underexposed. The whites on her tux will provide a reference white in the scene which will let you expose the rest darker. I do think you also need a tight spot on the podium coming from behind the conductor as a cue to help tell the story.
Working on it as we speak (or type and read to be more acurate).
NAPP Member | Canon Shooter
Weddings/Portraits and anything else that catches my eye.
www.daveswartz.com
Model Mayhem site http://www.modelmayhem.com/686552
HARMONY IN THE KITCHEN
NAPP Member | Canon Shooter
Weddings/Portraits and anything else that catches my eye.
www.daveswartz.com
Model Mayhem site http://www.modelmayhem.com/686552
This one looks too PS-ed to me. Besides, all the "choir" is so dark that you can barely see it. Neither of the themes is virtually there (I mean, I think neither artificial nor organic when I look at the picture).
I still think this particular setup has a potential, but the lighting is plain W.R.O.N.G.
Hope you have more aces in your sleeve!
Here's a quick primer on high key light vs. low key light:
In high key lighting, your backdrop is the lightest color thing in the scene. Your subject then pops by being darker than the background and tyipcally the darkest element will draw the most attention.
Low key light is the opposite: the background is the darkest element in the scene and the feature elements are bright.
The white background in this shot sets the stage for high key which means that to feature something you need to be dark. That works well for portraits of people with light skin because the eyes are often the darkest element in the frame. It also works well when you are trying to feature bright colors because the colors are often richer if they are slightly underexposed. In this shot, you are trying feature your soloist by putting a spot on her but you are really having the opposite effect and losing here in the background. You'll notice that real concerts rarely use high key light for just this reason. By going low key you will lose a little pop in the colors of your vegetables but in trade the spice jars will pop. Even the jars that are underexposed a stop will show much better than they are against the white.
Another thing too, look at pictures of stage lighting... it is often very contrasty with hot highlights and real dark lowlights... and it's almost never all white. Whether you simulate it in post or do it when you shoot doesn't matter, but it will really help you get that stage feel if you follow suit.
Creativity is allowing yourself to make mistakes. Art is knowing which ones to keep.
The Dang Gallery on DangRabbit - Follow me on Twitter or on Facebook
Leica M8: Zeiss 35mm f/2 Biogon and 50mm f/2 Planar; Voigtlander 15mm f/4.5, 50mm f/1.5 Nokton and 75mm f/2.5 Heliar
Olympus E-P1: Zuiko 14-42 and 25mm f/2.8 Pancake; Panasonic 45-200mm and 20mm f/1.7; and M-to-m4/3 adaptor
Olympus e620: Zuiko 14-54 f/2.8-3.5
NAPP Member | Canon Shooter
Weddings/Portraits and anything else that catches my eye.
www.daveswartz.com
Model Mayhem site http://www.modelmayhem.com/686552
I do agree with the others about lighting but I also understood your original intentions of a kitchen setting (it came through for me).
There is one thing that sticks out like a sore thumb for me and I'm not really sure if a substitute is possible but that piano just doesn't fit the rest of the texture and feel of the rest of the image. I do think the piano is needed since that is the main "spotlight" but maybe a more organic looking piano?
so far this is my favorite of the images you have worked on.
douglas
This has been an exercise...hopefully not in futility. I really like these with the black background as it allowed me to work with individual lighting much easier....like I mentioned...the idea of the kitchen and such but realize the lighting was conflicting with the overall mood. I sincerely appreciate your generosity in commenting. Here are two versions...which do you like better? OH, BTW...that's a potato harpsichord .
#1
#2
NAPP Member | Canon Shooter
Weddings/Portraits and anything else that catches my eye.
www.daveswartz.com
Model Mayhem site http://www.modelmayhem.com/686552
I like #2 better, seems a bit brighter.
This is how IRL band shot looks like:
Nice potato Harpsichord!
The only thing that feels off in these versions is the left vegetable tree it's off by itself and atracts a bit too much attention maybe?
definitely #2 out of these.
I didn't want to get so low that the back row of the bass section was lost or the altos. My thinking was that I was either going to be in the first section above the stage mid way out, or closer in but high enough to capture the essence. This is a different look....shot with wider lens, closer up, different angle (sorry Nik, I would have gone further but my little room doesn't allow it), and moved the rubarb closer in so it wasn't out there by itself.
#1
#2
NAPP Member | Canon Shooter
Weddings/Portraits and anything else that catches my eye.
www.daveswartz.com
Model Mayhem site http://www.modelmayhem.com/686552
Maybe I'm going blind, but I can't tell the difference #2 is a tad poppier, but barely so...
And, for the record, I didn't mean "from further away", I meant "lower", which you did, at least to a degree
The spotlight on the conductor seems to be PS-ed in. It definitely looks artificial, but I'm not sure if you're shooting for that particualr interpretation...
Overall it's getting better by the minute. I think you're on to something here:-)
Yes I like this angle much more.
#2 again!
The difference is very very subtle but #2 is a teeny bit brighter.
OK, out of all, this one I like best (newest revision...wow, what a workout) The spot on the conductor is changed as used a subtle spot for him as well.....ran out of floor space downstairs with all the booms, lights, tripod and me
NAPP Member | Canon Shooter
Weddings/Portraits and anything else that catches my eye.
www.daveswartz.com
Model Mayhem site http://www.modelmayhem.com/686552
Looks good to me.
Soooo, who did you say take this pikcha?
JK
Now, the real question is - what's the title?
Yea, for real...I might have taken it but not in it's present state....you're all too kind!
The other morning at 4:00 AM I woke up with this idea in my head....I called it "Choir in the Kitchen". Well, that's kind of like "Electric Toilet Seat" as I don't think I've ever seen a choir in the kitchen. But......there is harmony in the kitchen when using the proper spices and ingredients....so, the title is
"Harmony in the Kitchen"...the only thing missing is the wine....I think I may open a bottle :slosh
NAPP Member | Canon Shooter
Weddings/Portraits and anything else that catches my eye.
www.daveswartz.com
Model Mayhem site http://www.modelmayhem.com/686552
looks great! The title works.
douglas