My first wedding
Well, technically my second, since I'm married.
I had the pleasure of shooting my first wedding a few weeks ago. The B&G were friends, which was good (established relationship) and bad (extra pressure). I'm pretty happy with these results for a first outing, and they are too.
Lessons learned:
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7
#8
I had the pleasure of shooting my first wedding a few weeks ago. The B&G were friends, which was good (established relationship) and bad (extra pressure). I'm pretty happy with these results for a first outing, and they are too.
Lessons learned:
- I really needed a 200mm lens for shots from the back of the church. I was able to make 105mm work with a fair bit of cropping, but getting in closer would have been much better.
- I completely underestimated the developing load. My wife and I team-shot the event, which left me with >850 photos to work through. I'm using Lightroom, which was a lifesaver. However, I'd prefer a new computer with extra horses before I attempted anything so enormous again. Waiting on software is bad.
- I would do only the formals the B&G explicity asked for the next time around. I got everyone out of the sanctuary 30 minutes after the ceremony ended, but I lived 4 hours in those 30 minutes.
- I need to learn about fill flash, and probably off-camera lighting, for formals. I compensated with high ISO and IS, but more light would have been better.
- Pros who charge thousands are worth every penny. I have a whole new appreciation for the craft. I got some decent shots, but I was humbled.
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7
#8
0
Comments
** Feel free to edit my photos if you see room for improvement.**
Use what talents you possess: the woods would be very silent if
no birds sang there except those that sang best.
~Henry Van Dyke
#3, #5 and #8 are my favorites. Wonderful moments you've captured here, I'm sure they will be very pleased!
50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.8, 24-70 2.8L, 35mm 1.4L, 135mm f2L
ST-E2 Transmitter + (3) 580 EXII + radio poppers
Thanks! Yes, I'd do another. I need some time to save money for some longer glass and a new machine, though.
Swim for Them | WellmanHouse.net | AlbumFetcher | SmugShowBuilder
Thanks! That was their idea, and it turned out great. The darkness behind her white dress contrasts nicely with the brighter colors behind his tux. I hope I get the chance to use this shot again.
Swim for Them | WellmanHouse.net | AlbumFetcher | SmugShowBuilder
Thanks! Lightroom has a neat little grayscale tool that allows you to grab any part of the photo and change the intensity of that color channel. Some shadow issues that intefered with the B&W were a snap with that little tool.
Swim for Them | WellmanHouse.net | AlbumFetcher | SmugShowBuilder
Wow, thanks Lynne!
Swim for Them | WellmanHouse.net | AlbumFetcher | SmugShowBuilder
this is great reassurance for all of us dipping our toes in the wedding photography world. Thanks Bob!!!
50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.8, 24-70 2.8L, 35mm 1.4L, 135mm f2L
ST-E2 Transmitter + (3) 580 EXII + radio poppers
Thank you very much for the kind words. I also echo Lynne's thoughts concerning the anguish.
Swim for Them | WellmanHouse.net | AlbumFetcher | SmugShowBuilder
Thanks! My style is still in development. One key for me in getting good shots was having my wife help out. It helps to have someone else corralling the people while I'm clicking away. She also took all the "bride getting ready" photos, which was great!
I'm passing on all these compliments to her as well. You folks know how to make a couple feel good!
Swim for Them | WellmanHouse.net | AlbumFetcher | SmugShowBuilder
My main complaint is that the images look somewhat noisy. The ISO 100 shots look just as noisy as the ISO 1600 shots, so it must be something with the downsampling or the printing. It's not bad, just more than I would have expected. I'd certainly use them again. I'm sure better quality is out there, but for $50 this would be hard to beat.
Swim for Them | WellmanHouse.net | AlbumFetcher | SmugShowBuilder
www.davidsnookphotography.com
www.davidsnookphotography.com/blog