Moto-ST & Grand-Am at VIR
HarveyMushman
Registered Users Posts: 550 Major grins
This past weekend Virginia International Raceway played host to the Grand-Am car racing and Moto-ST motorcycle racing series. I was mainly interested in the bikes but managed to stay awake for the cars too. :wink
Nate Kern on the San Jose BMW R1200S
Former GP-rider Jimmy Filice on the Pair-A-Nines Kawasaki EX650
Brian Parriott on the same BMW shown above (Moto-ST is an endurance series, with at least two riders per bike)
Jason Edmunds on the RightsforBikers.com Ducati PS1000
Parriott & BMW again
More bikes (and cars) later . . .
Nate Kern on the San Jose BMW R1200S
Former GP-rider Jimmy Filice on the Pair-A-Nines Kawasaki EX650
Brian Parriott on the same BMW shown above (Moto-ST is an endurance series, with at least two riders per bike)
Jason Edmunds on the RightsforBikers.com Ducati PS1000
Parriott & BMW again
More bikes (and cars) later . . .
Tim
0
Comments
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
Awesome motor racing series. Good panning technique, I particularly like the photo no 3 and 4.
Richard
Thanks, Sid. That was one of the very first images I took Saturday morning. I admit I grinned a little when I viewed it on the pc.
Great shots, especially the first one.
Canon 40d | Canon 17-40 f/4L | Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 | Canon 50mm f/1.8 | Canon 70-200mm f/4 L
A few more bikes . . .
I used to dream of all things Nikon, then I got the bill.
http://www.sowdphotography.com/
Thank you. The lens is Nikon's 70-200/2.8 VR.
C&C is welcome, espcially re: the car photos, with which I'm not nearly as pleased. One thing that confuses me is why often one part of the car will appear out of focus, even though the lens was closed way down and DoF should be (is, in fact) deep.
http://www.dgrin.com/showthread.php?t=30160&highlight=focus+cars
tristansphotography.com (motorsports)
Canon 20D | 10-22 | 17-85 IS | 50/1.4 | 70-300 IS | 100/2.8 macro
Sony F717 | Hoya R72
1. This is almost the exact same view as yours.
2.
3.
Canon 20D
580ex
Canon 50 f1.8 MkII
Canon 70-200 f4L
www.pbase.com/wesstewart
What do you mean, "unfortunately?" I'm working on getting credentialed for events later this year, particularly the bike events. I'm really getting tired of shooting from:
You seem to have your panning technique down.
In the last batch, I think how much the car fills the frame is the issue. The Red Bull and the Mazda are too tight: it looks like the frame isn't quite big enough to hold them. I'm thinking if you can't get the whole car, pick the part you want and make it look exciting. The two wider shots of the Crown Royal car are caught in composition no-man's land. Not enough room to give context or tell a story, but too loose to be an agressive tight shot. The "ridge" shot is a good idea, just isn't working -- the overall beauty of the scene/composition isn't there. But you only get good by trying those over and over. I like the parked car shot, except it doesn't have a focal point. And worth noting that you were cursed by direct midday light, which is very unflattering.
If you're going to be doing this all summer, I'm intensely jealous. You're improving really fast, and you're going to become really good at this.
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
Thanks, Sid. Your suggestions are valid, I think. I often struggle with how tightly to compose. My inclination is to usually to keep it loose, to provide some context. I like pictures composed this way, but I'm a pretty serious racing fan. Someone interested in the photos for their own sake might want a little more "pop" from a tightly composed shot. I'm workin' on it.
Cycles: http://larre.smugmug.com/gallery/2779490/1/148244551
Rolex: http://larre.smugmug.com/gallery/2779477
Larrie