SOLD: Canon L lenses & accessories

rebelxtnewbierebelxtnewbie Registered Users Posts: 115 Major grins
edited May 9, 2007 in House of Canon
Both SOLD. Thanks you Cat!

Prices include Insured Priority Shipping to ConUS. Echeck or Balance transfer Paypal is accepted without extra fees. Credit/debit please add 3%.

Bonus items if you purchase both lenses. Tamrac camera bag & SanDisk 1GB CF card

$900
Mint 24-105 f/4 IS UT11xx (post flare issues). (Open to trade for a 24-70 f/2.8)
Box (no cut outs), hood, caps, paperwork. No soft pouch
483792134_a7d0a73767.jpg483792160_2e78813df6.jpg

$575
Mint Canon 70-200 f/4 L UT10xx
Box, hood, caps, case, paperwork
Tripod Mount Ring A(W) & B+W UV Filter
483792124_81dfa10393.jpg
483825439_390a57a7dd.jpg

Bonus Item if you purchase both. Bag can fit a 20D & 17-55 or 24-70 lens.
483798722_a6b67c67a0.jpg
Lenses: A Never Ending Revolving Door of stuff

Equipment ~ $5K, Income from pictures ~ $0K, Memories ~ Priceless

Comments

  • ShimaShima Registered Users Posts: 2,547 Major grins
    edited May 5, 2007
    Why are you parting with such nice lenses?

    When you say "post flare issues" with the 24-105, does this mean the lens has a flaw causing flare?
    Photography by Cat || My Gear List
    Facebook: Friend / Fan || Twitter: @shimamizu || Google Plus
  • BendrBendr Registered Users Posts: 665 Major grins
    edited May 5, 2007
    I think he means post, as in after flare issues...
    http://bendr.smugmug.com
  • ShimaShima Registered Users Posts: 2,547 Major grins
    edited May 6, 2007
    Bendr wrote:
    I think he means post, as in after flare issues...
    Meaning that this is the model after one that had issues?
    EDIT: to answer my own question, did some research, and yes, anything ut10xx and earlier had the problem evidently :)

    Just want to clarify as I'm strongly considering buying this lenses as after much discussion in this thread:
    http://www.dgrin.com/showthread.php?t=58622

    The conclusion I came to was that I want this lens. (plus the other lens was a close 2nd... which also makes it tempting!!)

    So much glass, so little money...
    Photography by Cat || My Gear List
    Facebook: Friend / Fan || Twitter: @shimamizu || Google Plus
  • rebelxtnewbierebelxtnewbie Registered Users Posts: 115 Major grins
    edited May 6, 2007
    Shima wrote:
    Why are you parting with such nice lenses?

    When you say "post flare issues" with the 24-105, does this mean the lens has a flaw causing flare?

    I have an every revolving door of lenses. I had a RebelXT with a 24-70, then replaced it with a 17-55 IS when that came out. Then got a 24-105 in anticipation of getting a 5D. Then I sold the 17-55 and kept the 24-105 thinking that I would prefer the reach over the speed. But now I think I rather have the speed so back to the 24-70 f/2.8.

    Models after UT10xx do not have flare problems.
    Lenses: A Never Ending Revolving Door of stuff

    Equipment ~ $5K, Income from pictures ~ $0K, Memories ~ Priceless
  • ShimaShima Registered Users Posts: 2,547 Major grins
    edited May 9, 2007
    I feel so poor now but so VERY excited to have some really nice lenses on their way soon :)
    Photography by Cat || My Gear List
    Facebook: Friend / Fan || Twitter: @shimamizu || Google Plus
Sign In or Register to comment.