I like #1 and #3 the best, good intensity and in-game facial expressions.
They might be a touch better if they had #2's exposure or "pop" but maybe that's just noticable because they're right next to it.
I like #1 and #3 the best, good intensity and in-game facial expressions.
They might be a touch better if they had #2's exposure or "pop" but maybe that's just noticable because they're right next to it.
thx
#2 had a levels adjustment....i wasn't sure i liked it.
it was a very cloudy day so #1 looks more like it did
#2 had a levels adjustment....i wasn't sure i liked it.
it was a very cloudy day so #1 looks more like it did
There's always a huge element of subjectivity to what's "better," perhaps that was the wrong word for me to use. And of course you were there and know what "the truth" was. With all the discussion about editing of photos, it's interesting to see how "just" a bit of levels can do to change the day's atmosphere.
There's always a huge element of subjectivity to what's "better," perhaps that was the wrong word for me to use. And of course you were there and know what "the truth" was. With all the discussion about editing of photos, it's interesting to see how "just" a bit of levels can do to change the day's atmosphere.
i understand completely....and i think i like it better w/ the levels adjusted...
i am not a big post processor and usually only sharpen and crop but you can change the whole feel of a pic w/ s/w
Very nice. You inspired me to take my camera to the NY Mets This friday. What lens did you use for these?
Also any Osprey shots lately?
Regards,
Laslo
hi laslo
i think most of these were w/ the nikon 300/4
I usually use the 70-200vr for baseball but took 2 lenses to this game (very rare for me to leave home w/ more than 1)
Hundreds of Osprey shots as this is the season
c/o my osprey gallery and go to the last page as they are saved by date
fantastic shots as always Randy. ...is the Wiki Gonzalez getting gunned down at 2nd?
thx Dave....
yes it is Wiki
I really enjoy shooting day games at this park as the sun is perfectly behind you the entire game. I think I prefer the 300/4 over the 70-200 and would take my sigma 300/2.8 but it's just so heavy to handhold.....
Comments
They might be a touch better if they had #2's exposure or "pop" but maybe that's just noticable because they're right next to it.
my words, my "pro"pictures, my "fun" pictures, my videos.
thx
#2 had a levels adjustment....i wasn't sure i liked it.
it was a very cloudy day so #1 looks more like it did
Randy
http://www.CarolinaSportsPhotography.com/
thx
Randy
http://www.CarolinaSportsPhotography.com/
There's always a huge element of subjectivity to what's "better," perhaps that was the wrong word for me to use. And of course you were there and know what "the truth" was. With all the discussion about editing of photos, it's interesting to see how "just" a bit of levels can do to change the day's atmosphere.
my words, my "pro"pictures, my "fun" pictures, my videos.
i understand completely....and i think i like it better w/ the levels adjusted...
i am not a big post processor and usually only sharpen and crop but you can change the whole feel of a pic w/ s/w
Randy
http://www.CarolinaSportsPhotography.com/
Very nice. You inspired me to take my camera to the NY Mets This friday. What lens did you use for these?
Also any Osprey shots lately?
Regards,
Laslo
hi laslo
i think most of these were w/ the nikon 300/4
I usually use the 70-200vr for baseball but took 2 lenses to this game (very rare for me to leave home w/ more than 1)
Hundreds of Osprey shots as this is the season
c/o my osprey gallery and go to the last page as they are saved by date
http://randyr.smugmug.com/gallery/2330458#69301061
Randy
http://www.CarolinaSportsPhotography.com/
Dave
thx Dave....
yes it is Wiki
I really enjoy shooting day games at this park as the sun is perfectly behind you the entire game. I think I prefer the 300/4 over the 70-200 and would take my sigma 300/2.8 but it's just so heavy to handhold.....
Randy
http://www.CarolinaSportsPhotography.com/