Video Editing suggestions?
djsilver666666
Registered Users Posts: 77 Big grins
Sorry to bother you guys/gals about video software suggestions. I know this forum is supposed to be about software for pictures, but I thought that surely somebody would have an enlightened opinion about good software for video editing that they would share with me!
0
Comments
I edit for a living. I would need more information, but if you can afford it, and you're serious about this, then Final Cut Studio is the software to get. It's an incredible suite of software.
Also, I'm going to move this to Big Picture.
Dgrin FAQ | Me | Workshops
In which case, I understand that Final Cut Express might be the best software for you. It's the equivalent of Photoshop Elements: a powerful but simplified version of the full bore professional software.
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
True. It's the power of the suite that's so cool, with the Pro version.
The thing I would not do is get on the Avid course, or Premiere, or any other apps. Final Cut is the way to go, whether Pro or Express.
Dgrin FAQ | Me | Workshops
Until I found Vegas, I really was about to buy a Mac and Final Cut... If I would have, would the world have been a better place?
I will try out Final Cut Studio, sounds like it'll be good!!!
Edit: nvrmnd, I don't have a mac... :
Well, the good Mac news is that it comes bundled with what that Sony product gives you, in iMovie and iDVD. But then again, it's only cheap if you're already buying a Mac!
I know nothing about the Sony product. If you're just messing around, then fine. If you're serious at all about it, then you should think twice.
Dgrin FAQ | Me | Workshops
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
And I was really looking for just simple video editing software. I am looking for software for a friend of mine who is about 40, and she doesn't need high end/frills deal. Clean and simple. (And not like a $100)
Windows Movie Maker comes with Windows XP. It's free, fairly limited in what you can do with it... but it might work. Check the Windows Update site to make sure you have the most recent version.
$100 is considered pretty cheap as far as this type of software is concerned. I abhor Ulead and Pinnacle products!
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
If you plan to keep the editable project files you will need to more than double the space.
I started out using iMovie and iDVD. I now have Final Cut 2 on order. WMM and the Sony Vegas are ok but as has been said they have limitations.
http://help.smugmug.com
-joel
Link to my Smugmug site
This was my experience as well. But since the trial is free, it's worth a shot.
Don't worry, I've got 300GB internal plus 4 300GB and a 320 GB external HD. And after I download and edit the files I burn them to DVDs as .rar archives.
I'll certainly try the trial before I buy, if I do.
www.fitmet.com
I've got a couple high-end pro suites for pro editing but have used Pinnacle Studio (9 and 10) for pro work for years.
I've also used it in the classroom (I've taught documentary video for years) with low-time users in K-12 and university classrooms and have spec'd it for statewide use--got one call for tech support in 7 years.
Early versions were somewhat unstable--not terribly so--but I still run a mobile lab of 7 laptops that are steam-powered Celeron 750's and they run all day for days on end in training sessions with teachers and kids pounding on them.
I think if you're a first-time editor instant gratification is pretty important. Most of the time the frustration I hear from n00bs is the suite that carries them from capture to edit to render is what causes problems...the drag-and-drop ease of most simplified configs of suites isn't so much an issue, but getting the video in and out of the machine causes some consternation.
That, and people tend to suggest a high-end suite for first-timers who don't need that sort of graphics package power....just something that will work. As the user figures out the feature they do need they can upgrade if needed...but IMHO it's best to have a really good experience early on.
That said, I think Pinnacle 9 or 10 will keep most folks happy because of the seamless capture, edit, and render function.
It's not as swanky as recommending Vegas or Edition, but it works.
And, like I said, I've banged out news work on Pinnacle in the field when I have just minutes to get a story out. I depend on it for my income and it hasn't let me down. With the work I do, transitions are a crutch for bad shooting and editing technique and I use cuts-only 90% of the time. I don't need 800 different ways to dissolve nor do I want it to look like 80's wedding video.
One of the things that'll make your video look better isn't the suite but how you shot it in the first place. There are some simple things you can do that'll make your stuff look great, even if you're using some simple editing program that was bundled with the computer or camera.
Happy to help out if anyone gets to that point.
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au