BMW action composite

mercphotomercphoto Registered Users Posts: 4,550 Major grins
edited May 15, 2007 in Sports
Does this action collage "work"? Or do you know what I am trying to do but have a better idea how to accomplish it? Thanks.

151535413-M.jpg
Bill Jurasz - Mercury Photography - Cedar Park, TX
A former sports shooter
Follow me at: https://www.flickr.com/photos/bjurasz/
My Etsy store: https://www.etsy.com/shop/mercphoto?ref=hdr_shop_menu

Comments

  • Frog LadyFrog Lady Registered Users Posts: 1,091 Major grins
    edited May 11, 2007
    Bill, I think I get what you're trying to do. But IMHO, I'm not sure it works. I think part of the problem is that the accessory turn images are too small and too obviously pasted in. I'm not sure if it would "read" better if they were on the curve of the road themselves... larger and just the car.

    Nice concept, good luck fine tuning it.

    C.
    Colleen
    ***********************************
    check out my (sports) pics: ColleenBonney.smugmug.com

    *Thanks to Boolsacho for the avatar photo (from the dgrin portrait project)
  • mercphotomercphoto Registered Users Posts: 4,550 Major grins
    edited May 11, 2007
    I think drop shadows on the smaller photos would help. I also tried this:
    151552924-M.jpg
    Bill Jurasz - Mercury Photography - Cedar Park, TX
    A former sports shooter
    Follow me at: https://www.flickr.com/photos/bjurasz/
    My Etsy store: https://www.etsy.com/shop/mercphoto?ref=hdr_shop_menu
  • DblDbl Registered Users Posts: 230 Major grins
    edited May 11, 2007
    How about your second idea only fade each of the layers so the last car would be light increasing in intensity as you reach the main photo? Give you an idea of speed I would think.
    Dan

    Canon Gear
  • HarveyMushmanHarveyMushman Registered Users Posts: 550 Major grins
    edited May 11, 2007
    mercphoto wrote:
    Does this action collage "work"? Or do you know what I am trying to do but have a better idea how to accomplish it? Thanks.

    151535413-S.jpg

    I don't think it works. The main image is not interesting--there's no drama and the DoF is way too deep. Maybe shooting from a lower perspective would help. ne_nau.gif

    The smaller images are distracting and not especially dramatic. Maybe if their placement matched the curve of the road they'd be more appealing.

    Overall, I think the composition needs to be much tighter and there needs to be some kind of blur or blend effect around the smaller images, though I haven't the slightest idea how one would do that. :D
    Tim
  • Dusty SensibaDusty Sensiba Registered Users Posts: 91 Big grins
    edited May 11, 2007
    Hugin
    Try loading the images into Hugin, it should make for an interesting composition.
    http://hugin.sourceforge.net/

    I like the idea of gradually increasing size on the bimmers.
  • mercphotomercphoto Registered Users Posts: 4,550 Major grins
    edited May 11, 2007
    Thanks for all the replies. I've learned a few things. One, I never intended to make a sequence like this in the first place, but to make this work requires a change in composition when you originally take the photos. Fixed focal length, reasonably fixed camera angle. Manual exposure (so the asphalt is a consistent color, for example). And don't shoot a tight crop. I can still fiddle with the shots I have and will post a new version by Sunday from existing shots.

    Thanks!
    Bill Jurasz - Mercury Photography - Cedar Park, TX
    A former sports shooter
    Follow me at: https://www.flickr.com/photos/bjurasz/
    My Etsy store: https://www.etsy.com/shop/mercphoto?ref=hdr_shop_menu
  • mercphotomercphoto Registered Users Posts: 4,550 Major grins
    edited May 12, 2007
    I think I figured out how to do this :)
    151840151-M.jpg
    Bill Jurasz - Mercury Photography - Cedar Park, TX
    A former sports shooter
    Follow me at: https://www.flickr.com/photos/bjurasz/
    My Etsy store: https://www.etsy.com/shop/mercphoto?ref=hdr_shop_menu
  • xtnomadxtnomad Registered Users Posts: 340 Major grins
    edited May 12, 2007
    That is cool,will have to give it a shot on the next shoot. thumb.gif
    xtnomad :wink
  • Chris_SChris_S Registered Users Posts: 48 Big grins
    edited May 13, 2007
    mercphoto wrote:
    I think I figured out how to do this :)
    That last one is much better. Maybe get rid of the 2nd bmw from the front.
    I have done a similar shot here (http://photosbychris.smugmug.com/photos/135112791-L-1.jpg)
  • CheesheadCheeshead Registered Users Posts: 23 Big grins
    edited May 13, 2007
    How did you do this? Don't have to be to detailed, just a brief overview?

    Thanks!
  • mercphotomercphoto Registered Users Posts: 4,550 Major grins
    edited May 13, 2007
    Cheeshead wrote:
    How did you do this? Don't have to be to detailed, just a brief overview?
    Take the photos in a burst, use the same focal length and do not move yourself. This seems to keep all the perspectives and sizes the same in the images. Looking back I should have done a manual exposure as well so that there were not subtle shifts from image to image.

    I took the "main" image as my starting point, the last car. I then asked which way I would be adding photos (in this case to the right and up) and had Photoshop add blank space to the canvas. This gave me room to move photos around. I took the next image, copied its layer on top the main, and reduced its opacity to about 50%. I moved that around until background elements lined up correctly. Now take the opacity back to 100% and start masking off what you don't want. Repeat.
    Bill Jurasz - Mercury Photography - Cedar Park, TX
    A former sports shooter
    Follow me at: https://www.flickr.com/photos/bjurasz/
    My Etsy store: https://www.etsy.com/shop/mercphoto?ref=hdr_shop_menu
  • DavidTODavidTO Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 19,160 Major grins
    edited May 13, 2007
    Cheeshead wrote:
    How did you do this? Don't have to be to detailed, just a brief overview?

    Thanks!


    More on the technique here.
    Moderator Emeritus
    Dgrin FAQ | Me | Workshops
  • mercphotomercphoto Registered Users Posts: 4,550 Major grins
    edited May 14, 2007
    DavidTO wrote:
    More on the technique here.
    I could have saved myself a lot of work by searching the tutorials huh? :D
    Bill Jurasz - Mercury Photography - Cedar Park, TX
    A former sports shooter
    Follow me at: https://www.flickr.com/photos/bjurasz/
    My Etsy store: https://www.etsy.com/shop/mercphoto?ref=hdr_shop_menu
  • DavidTODavidTO Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 19,160 Major grins
    edited May 14, 2007
    mercphoto wrote:
    I could have saved myself a lot of work by searching the tutorials huh? :D


    Heh. Well, it's not strictly a tutorial, but maybe it should be!
    Moderator Emeritus
    Dgrin FAQ | Me | Workshops
  • Ann McRaeAnn McRae Registered Users Posts: 4,584 Major grins
    edited May 14, 2007
    My tip in this - instead of setting the layers to 50% opacity, try using 'difference'. This really allows fine tuning of overlapping parts. It allows you to erase the stuff that you do not want, etc. Useful technique when you need to add people, or change eyes on one in a group shot, or whatever.

    ann
  • CheesheadCheeshead Registered Users Posts: 23 Big grins
    edited May 15, 2007
    Thanks for all the tips!! I'm gonna have to try it out now.
Sign In or Register to comment.