Mothers Day Present
Took my two boys to the local park to shoot some pictures for a mothers day present. (pictures of the kids always seem to work :wink )
I promised them lunch out if they stayed clean in their good school clothes.
2 Vivitar 285HV's, one camera left at 1/2 power through white umbrella, the other camera right, 1/4 power with a diffuser.
Thanks for looking, C&C welcome.
I promised them lunch out if they stayed clean in their good school clothes.
2 Vivitar 285HV's, one camera left at 1/2 power through white umbrella, the other camera right, 1/4 power with a diffuser.
Thanks for looking, C&C welcome.
Dale
Canon 30d
EF 28-105mm 1:3.5-4.5 USM II
EF 100-300mm 1:4.5-5.6 USM
Speedlight 380EX
Sekonic L-28c2 Studio Deluxe
http://photography.daleestes.com
Canon 30d
EF 28-105mm 1:3.5-4.5 USM II
EF 100-300mm 1:4.5-5.6 USM
Speedlight 380EX
Sekonic L-28c2 Studio Deluxe
http://photography.daleestes.com
0
Comments
nice shots - they look near the same age as my boys, and boy do they grow fast about then:D
I like the 1st one better for several reasons. The you did a nice job of cropping out most of the graffiti, your older boy's smile looks more relaxed/less forced in the 1st and I like the relaxed poses of the 1st as well. In either case, I imagine "mom" will like them just the same (wish my hubby would do that for me).
C.
***********************************
check out my (sports) pics: ColleenBonney.smugmug.com
*Thanks to Boolsacho for the avatar photo (from the dgrin portrait project)
they appear a bit flat to me. Other than that, they're great mom's day gifts.
Hinson
www.Jerrywhitephotography.com
-Marilyn Monroe
Maybe the flatness is from the lack of color range. To me it looks very monochromatic. Maybe I overlit it?
Not sure I understand the "too many shadows" comment. If I eliminate the shadows, then I think it would really look flat.
Canon 30d
EF 28-105mm 1:3.5-4.5 USM II
EF 100-300mm 1:4.5-5.6 USM
Speedlight 380EX
Sekonic L-28c2 Studio Deluxe
http://photography.daleestes.com
...but here is an example of what is meant.
www.Jerrywhitephotography.com
And here is the other one. These were done really quick in photoshop so they could actually be a bit better.
As for the 'shadows:' Notice the shadows behind their heads? This could have been partially eliminated by raising your main light a bit higher to drop the shadows down behind them.
Hinson
www.Jerrywhitephotography.com
Canon 30d
EF 28-105mm 1:3.5-4.5 USM II
EF 100-300mm 1:4.5-5.6 USM
Speedlight 380EX
Sekonic L-28c2 Studio Deluxe
http://photography.daleestes.com
The first was levels only, the second was curves and then levels. It was a quick and dirty adj just to show you what could be done. I think it gave them a bit more 'snap.'
Hinson
www.Jerrywhitephotography.com