LAB: why no "c" channel?
Snapper
Registered Users Posts: 42 Big grins
Greetings all!
I've been lurking for several months and have picked up a massive amount of information from the learned folk who frequent this forum: I thank you all most sincerely.
I read a post some weeks back where someone explained why it was not necessary to have a Red/Cyan channel in LAB, but I can't find it again and I'm having trouble coming up with useful words to search on.
Could someone please run this one past me once more.
Thanks!
I've been lurking for several months and have picked up a massive amount of information from the learned folk who frequent this forum: I thank you all most sincerely.
I read a post some weeks back where someone explained why it was not necessary to have a Red/Cyan channel in LAB, but I can't find it again and I'm having trouble coming up with useful words to search on.
Could someone please run this one past me once more.
Thanks!
Ian
Website: igMusic
Website: igMusic
0
Comments
My understanding is that it's because you can describe red and cyan with magenta, blue, yellow and green.
Red is magenta and yellow, for instance. Cyan...I'm not sure, I'd have to go review the materials. I guess I get downgraded for that.
Have you gone through our LAB reading group?
Dgrin FAQ | Me | Workshops
Website: igMusic
Get the book.
Dgrin FAQ | Me | Workshops
Green + Blue = Cyan
When the a and b channel have the same value (a = b) you are somewhere on the Cyan - Red axis.
The reason why LAB (aka L*a*b, from CIELAB) has chosen this particular color combination is rather academic and mostly historical. Dan goes into some details about that, but the real matter is: yes, it's possible to use many different combinations, but here's one, it works, so it kinda boils down to Occam principle. We have way too many DVD, HD and media card formats to start colorspace format war once again (as if we don't have enough colorspaces already:-).