Laying my cards on the table
pemmett
Registered Users Posts: 507 Major grins
Well, as I've mentioned before "Beginner Grinner" is my middle name. And now I have the photographic equivalent of ‘stage fright’ – I’ve tried being a crocodile (:D), but it hasn’t worked so far. So I’m laying my cards on the table in need of some direction and feedback. Below are my “best” images from the last week, please can you help me either choose which one you think is best, and/or tell which one or two I should focus on re-shooting to make them better.
I couldn't find any rules that say I shouldn't do this (please let me know if otherwise), but realize that showing my hand may put me at a disadvantage.
#1 – Never Forget
#2 – Hair
#3 – Spring Flower
#4 – Summer Flower
#5 – Ventilate
#6 – Yellow
#7 – Dance
#8 – Snack Time
I couldn't find any rules that say I shouldn't do this (please let me know if otherwise), but realize that showing my hand may put me at a disadvantage.
#1 – Never Forget
#2 – Hair
#3 – Spring Flower
#4 – Summer Flower
#5 – Ventilate
#6 – Yellow
#7 – Dance
#8 – Snack Time
0
Comments
"Unprocessed Chicken Nuggets"
Looking for tips on macro photography? Check out my Blog: No Cropping Zone.
Thanks for the feedback.
Actually I'd thought about "One man's rubbish is another man's treasure". This was taken from a local market here in the Philippines, where please really do eat chicken's feet and the chicken heads are used for stock (although they can be eaten).
Personally I really like chickens feet for Chinese Dim Sum (I lived in Hong Kong for 18 years), though I have found it hard to find a good support group for this kind of addiction. Amazingly I even found a restaurant here that de-bones the chicken feet before cooking them, but I found that half the fun of eating the feet is spitting out the bones
Actually a walk around a "wet Market" here is quite an experience and I would say not for the faint hearted
My images | My blog | My free course
In another life, or at least it seems that way so long ago, I spent two months in the PI and another two in Singapore. The destroyer I was on played chicken with a civilian ship that was carrying munitions and lost. So I've seen exactly what you're describing. I actually had some of the best frog legs I've ever eaten in that part of the world
Looking for tips on macro photography? Check out my Blog: No Cropping Zone.
#1
I love the message you're trying to get across with this one. If you have another version with a silhouette of someone slightly profiled and looking up, it would be more effective.
#2
Love it! The light on her hair looks great! This one's my overall favorite.
#3
Looks grainy on my monitor. Not sure if that was the effect you wanted. Doesn't do much for me.
#4
Better than #3. Details are nice and crisp.
#5 & #6
I'd be leary of submitting either one of those for fear of getting dinged by a comment to the effect of someone's eye wandering all over the photo without a focal point of sorts.
#7
Very nice! Love it!
#8
This one has the same problem as #5 & #6. It's kind of gross, but....I think you can pull this one off with a clever caption.
http://lrichters.smugmug.com
The girl is a little too centered in #1. In #8, the corners are darker - perhaps you could PS it to change that?!
Hope this helps. Good luck!
Sunita
good for you! I haven't compiled all my ideas yet, you're way ahead of me. Of the ones you posted, I'm leaning toward #7, the dancer. I like the movement in it and the lighting too. Have fun choosing, you're doing great!!!
Tessa
www.tessa-hd.smugmug.com
www.printandportfolio.com
This summer's wilderness photography project: www.tessa-hd.smugmug.com/gallery/3172341
I would forget abstracts. Abstracts in general have never done well in the challenges and these two have no "wow" factor.
#1 has a lot of promise, but for me the silhouette is too small in the frame. You might try various crops. Part of my problem with the picture is that the silhouette isn't of the whole body and part of it is that the background overpowers the person. While that may be the message of the photograph - and a powerful message at that -- I'm not feeling anything when I see the photograph except frustration that the names are slightly fuzzy, especially in the lower lefthand corner.
The flower shots are lovely. The chicken shot is "interesting" but probably not a good entry for this round.
The dancer is lovely but would be much stronger for me if it had been taken from the front and if her dress did not almost disappear into the background.
You are coming up with some really nice shots so keep on shooting. It is clear that you are going to have something marvelous to enter. And, on top of that, you will have some really neat shots to add to your porfolio.
Virginia
"A photograph is a secret about a secret. The more it tells you, the less you know." Diane Arbus
Email
As for #8 I was first drawn to it out of pure intrique of the subject but it may grow old after longer examination and consideration of what you are actually looking at. It does coneve emotion though and a different caption would help.
All good efforts though and you will do great. Good luck!
"Look, I'm not an intellectual - I just take photographs." -- Helmut Newton
My Photos
My Facebook
I've played around with #2 a bit to try and improve it as much as I can based on the comments. Is this going in the right direction? (without reshooting the image for the moment of course.)
My images | My blog | My free course
I can see others' points about it, but the only thing I wished was for her eyes to seem a little more in focus...which it seems you've corrected in your reworking of the pic.
I love it.
Amy
The macro and abstract shots, though well done, don't really do anything for me. I've seen to many Lord V shots! I think the dancers face should be showing, and the chickens don't hold my attention because I don't want to look at them!
I'm torn on the first, I also think it has potential, but it's not quite there yet and I'm not sure why.
Anyway, just my 2c.
Chris, Thanks for the feedback. Do you think that the highlights on the hair are adjusted enough on the image below to remove the distraction you mentioned? I'm really trying to find the right balance for each of the components so the re-shoot is easier. Thanks.
My images | My blog | My free course
"Look, I'm not an intellectual - I just take photographs." -- Helmut Newton
This was the original background - which do you prefer?
My images | My blog | My free course
Adrian
my stuff is here.....
I was thinking more along the lines of a reshoot with a different background but again take all of this with a grain of salt as I am no expert and merely giving my humble and subjective opinion. As for the two versions you do have, I would stick with your origional if not reshooting.
"Look, I'm not an intellectual - I just take photographs." -- Helmut Newton
been super busy these past weeks..geez.
Ok...first, I'd like to see the focus spot on...right now the entire image is too noisy and looks like a bit of camera shake. At this distance, she should be tack sharp, then if you want to soften it a bit ok....but it doesn't look right. They eyes don't POP as a result. I don't find the highlights of the hair distracting at all, rather, I think it identifies the essence of the "Angelic". I personally think it's all about the hair with the eyes sharp. Her cute face is an added bonus but be quite careful of overprocessing as her skin tones are washed out....looks like she has freckles (kind of)...let's see them. Get that flash off the camera, or use the better bounce card (easy to make) spin the flash around and use crinkled tin foil on a hard piece of cardboard to bounce it.
I think the shot has potential and would be worth retaking. Ok, my pockets are empty now 2 cents doesn't go very far these days.
NAPP Member | Canon Shooter
Weddings/Portraits and anything else that catches my eye.
www.daveswartz.com
Model Mayhem site http://www.modelmayhem.com/686552
#8 – Snack Time is just too horrid for my liking.
Suggested title: "Parts is Parts"