D80 or D200?
I am shooting with a D70 right now and need to get a new camera, not considering price, would you say buy the D80 or D200?
Just curious as to your thoughts.
Thanks!!!
Just curious as to your thoughts.
Thanks!!!
Lissa
www.photosbylissa.com
www.photosbylissa.blogspot.com
Gear
Nikon D200
Nikon D70
Nikon N70
Nikkor 24-70 f2.8
Nikkor 50mm f1.8
Tamron 28-75 f2.8
Nikkor 18-70
Tamron 75-300
SB-600
www.photosbylissa.com
www.photosbylissa.blogspot.com
Gear
Nikon D200
Nikon D70
Nikon N70
Nikkor 24-70 f2.8
Nikkor 50mm f1.8
Tamron 28-75 f2.8
Nikkor 18-70
Tamron 75-300
SB-600
0
Comments
That said, the price was a deciding point for me. The D200 body books for $1500 while the D80 body is only $900. I ended up finding a brand new D80 for $850 with the 18-135mm lens from a friend of mine who works wholesale. Got a 5 year Mack warranty for another $50 and I'm set to go for $900. If price wasn't a problem I'd get the D200 but I can't say there is anything wrong with the D80. It is really well built and takes gorgeous pictures.
Robert
I am really torn on what to buy, I actually like the weight of the d200 and would buy a battery clip for the d80 to add weight if I bought that. I have a bad problem holding the camera still, so I think I would have better luck adding a little weight.
Everyone I have talked to that has the d80 is extremely pleased with it and your reply shows tells me that too. Ahhh, I just don't know what to do.
Thanks for the replies, all are extremely appreciated.
www.photosbylissa.com
www.photosbylissa.blogspot.com
Gear
Nikon D200
Nikon D70
Nikon N70
Nikkor 24-70 f2.8
Nikkor 50mm f1.8
Tamron 28-75 f2.8
Nikkor 18-70
Tamron 75-300
SB-600
Good luck!
Regards,
Mike
www.photosbylissa.com
www.photosbylissa.blogspot.com
Gear
Nikon D200
Nikon D70
Nikon N70
Nikkor 24-70 f2.8
Nikkor 50mm f1.8
Tamron 28-75 f2.8
Nikkor 18-70
Tamron 75-300
SB-600
There's a lot of threads about this subject there, and some are better than others. If you have any trouble finding the better ones, let me know and I'll try to find them for you. And if you have any additional questions that aren't answered in those threads, by all means post them here.
And let us know what you decide (even if it's a Canon).
The battery grip makes a nice addition and prevents the camera doing a nose-dive when it is hanging around my neck during a wedding shoot .
http://clearwaterphotography.smugmug.com/
I know I'm not the first to express this thought, but if the price isn't an issue, just get the D200.
It's a great Camera. I don't have one, myself, but know a few sports photographers in the area that do. I fell in love with Fujifilm's remake of the D200, the S5Pro, and will probably be getting a D200 as my next backup because the body is my favorite of any I've ever handled. It is built like a tank, and the only openning in the camera lacking a very effective weather seal is the one the lens attaches to. And the feel of the camera... It's just... Well... Uhm... Go to a camera shop that has one and just ask to hold it.
My new D200 arrived yesterday!!! I LOVE IT!
At first I was a little overwhelmed, but got the Manual out and got my settings set and in no time I was clicking away. My first reaction was holy smokes is this thing fast. My 1 year old daughter runs from the camera, now I'm faster than she is.
Thank-you all so much for your help. I greatly appreciate it. I really had a hard time deciding. But in the end I decided that the durability and speed fo the D200 won out for me. And I don't find it big at all actually and I have really small hands.
I am thinking of getting the handstrap. Anyone use this, recommend it? Since my hands are small I was thinking this would help give me a little security with this expensive piece of equipment in my hand.
to all of you for your help. I sure love it here!
www.photosbylissa.com
www.photosbylissa.blogspot.com
Gear
Nikon D200
Nikon D70
Nikon N70
Nikkor 24-70 f2.8
Nikkor 50mm f1.8
Tamron 28-75 f2.8
Nikkor 18-70
Tamron 75-300
SB-600
Congrats on the smart decision!
Now go out there and take some cute pictures. Be sure to post them here for us to view!
http://clearwaterphotography.smugmug.com/
- Ansel Adams.
http://michaelnel.smugmug.com
I'm asking primarily because I'm very interested in getting a D80. However, the D200 isn't even a consideration for me and the D80 is more at the upper end for me rather than at a lower end.
Ernie
I have large hands and the D80 feels too small to me too, and it doesn't balance well with heavier lenses. I fully intend to get a D200 when I can afford to and at that time I will be better able to compare them. Right now my comparison is based on owning the D80 and having handled and played with a D200.
http://michaelnel.smugmug.com
Have you looked into the MB-D80 battery grip? Although you will probably not like the plastic feel, it will make the D80 much larger in your hands and provide much bettr balance with larger lenses.
It sounds like the D200 would have been a better camera for you, but I don't think your reasoning necessarily makes it the right decision for someone else. For many people, the D200 is too much camera -- too big, too heavy, too complex and lacking in preset auto modes. So for them, the D80 is the better camera. I think it just depends on the person as to which camera is better.
Regards,
Mike
I've considered it, but I really don't want to put more money into this D80 body. As I said, I intend to switch to a D200 as soon as I can.
You're absolutely right on all counts, Mike!
http://michaelnel.smugmug.com
Congratulations! I think you'll continue to LOVE it. I have the 12-24 and the 18-200 lenses; now I'm coveting "big glass".
Re your question about the handstrap. I don't use a handstrap. But, this is a heavy camera so you need a "good" strap. I replaced the Nikon neck straps after one worked itself loose and the camera rolled down the steps of an airplane onto the tarmac. The filter on the front of the lens was busted all to heck, but the camera and lens survived. Now I only use Op/Tech USA straps -- one less thing to worry about. They have straps for all uses and tastes (and hand grips):
http://optechusa.com/category/second/?CATEGORY_ID=4
This is the particular strap I like:
http://optechusa.com/product/detail/?PRODUCT_ID=23&PRODUCT_SUB_ID=
Enjoy - Dianne
******************************************
http://www.djea.smugmug.com
http://michaelnel.smugmug.com
I start first by saying that I take photos at horse shows for a living, and I have just this first half of the year moved from the D100 to the D200. In 4 years I have basically gone through five D100s. These D100s can still take photos, but they just can't seem to be cleaned out any longer. Horse shows put the camera into a lot of dust, and even bags and Aquatechs don't seem to keep them clean very long. So money is an object. I just couldn't consider getting a D2x and needing five of those in 4 years! Understand that equestrian is a fine mix of sports and portrait photography....
Here are the D200 features I like that you might find nice:
1. Flash sync speed is 1/250 (D200) vs. 1/200 (D80) vs 1/180 (D100). Very important when shooting the horses in an indoor arena.
2. 5 fps, adjustable to 4 or 3 vs. the D80's fixed 3fps. A horse moves a long way in 1/3second! With the D100 I had to take only one shot over a jump. It might be up high or a near landing, but if I tried to take both, I basically got both wrong. Now I can take the proper position over the jump and just hold down the shutter release and get a few other great shots. I can also guage the horse' speed upon approach and make a quick adjustment to 3 or 4 fps to get an over and a landing.. It's cheap, but it's another picture!
3. CF vs. SD. Just can't stand those SD.
4. Weight: 1'5oz D80 vs 1'13oz D200. Panning to follow a subject had great momentum to keep sequences centered. Even I prefer the 80-200 f2.8 AFS to the 70-200 f2.8 VR to have a bit more "momentum."
5. 1/8000 shutter speed D200 vs. 1/4000. I shoot Aperture Priority at f2.8 almost always, and on bright days, it's another stop of flexibilty before I have to start messing with exposure compensation to keep white horses and saddle pads from getting blown out....
Then there is the WB adjustment to a preset Kelvin, same in both cameras, that you will find very nice. Learn about it and use it!
I do have someone working for me who uses a D80, and I must say that either/both fo these cameras are now giving my customers a nice jump in photo quality.
Onward!
www.HoofClix.com / Personal Facebook / Facebook Page
and I do believe its true.. that there are roads left in both of our shoes..
I agree with everything Hoofclix just said. I shoot horses as well with a D200 and a 80-200 2.8. The 5 FPS is very nice for that. I shot with a D100 before this camera, and the D100 is still a fantastic camera, but the D200 is just amazing. A real workhorse. I just shot my first event with this up at Estes Park, CO and got about 3,500 shots total. It was very easy to work with right off the bat.
I picked up a D80 when they first came out and the cheap plastic feel was a big turnoff. Kept using the D100 over getting a D80 for another 7 months before I picked up the D200. No regrets. The battery pack makes it a little too unweildly for me.
regular site
oo
smug site
Really? I love the battery grip. Yeah, it makes it big and it adds to what is already a heavy body. I'm built thin and small handed for a guy, but dont find the weight unwieldy. It weighs heavy on the neck, but I cross-sling my camera when not using it and it's light worn that way. The benefits of it make me not in any way regret getting it, though.
Mind you, I don't photograph horses, yet. I do mostly nature photography and landscapes now, but I'm flexible and shoot a wide range of stuff. This coming weekend I'm going to be at the Oregon Country Fair, shooting mostly for myself but some under contract for a long-time business aquaintance of mine. Also, I don't actually use a D200. Plan to get one as soon as I can afford it, for flexibility and back up, but right now I use the FujiFilm remake - the S5Pro. I fell in love with it for it's wide dynamic range and low noise high ISO. A d200 would be for the little bit more resolution, 5 fps, and be used in very different situations.
The battery grip, though offers several benefits:
1.) The ability to keep the camera on constantly when shooting, switching out batteries one at a time. They do not share the load evenly and never go dead at the same time, so you can keep a battery recharging and the camera usable constantly with just 3 or 4 batteries. It is a step beyond just extended battery life. Also, I find I can switch the batteries out much quicker with the grip than fumbling with the little (removable) hatch on the bottom the camera.
2.) Verticle Grip - enough said.
3.) The additional mass to the body of the camera further aids in resisting or maintaining even inertia, and also balances heavier lenses better than without it.
4.) It is an additional piece of armor when and if the camera gets dropped. With it on, my camera has not yet taken a drop abrasion to the body of the camera itself. Only abrasion to the body of the camera was from being brushed up against a wall.
I can't think of a negative aspect that is more than just a mild inconvenience, like needing to take the grip off to fit it into a smaller bag.
If you are not in a hurry ,as the D200 is discontinued now , and the 25th being Nikon's 90th anniversary , there just "MIGHT" be a D200 upgrade ?????????
http://wildwally.smugmug.com/
Battery grip is a real plus. Gives balance going from portrait to landscape. I don't ever change hand position to the alternate shutter release. The battery usage is also a very nice feature, but I don't know how this compares to the D80. Intertia is of great importance when following a subject. All of that really makes it a great alternative to the D2x and/or D2H...
www.HoofClix.com / Personal Facebook / Facebook Page
and I do believe its true.. that there are roads left in both of our shoes..
I may just quit photography altogether (again), as I have not been pleased with my results, and I certainly cannot blame them on the D80. In the meantime I'll accumulate some $$$ so when I decide what to do I'll be able to.
http://michaelnel.smugmug.com
As a steadycam type weight I'll buy, but for power not so much.
I'm not sure about you guys, but when it's 97 degrees and you've been shooting on your feet for 2-3 hours per session for days and your back is hurting from the camera, even with the camera clipped to the front of a shoulder harness rig to distribute the weight, your feet are sore (Dr. Schols Gel inserts are the best valued accessorie in my arsenal,) that battery pack is the straw that breaks my back.
It's big, it's ugly, and it's actually kinda cheap. A fresh battery lasts me for 3 hours of near constant shooting. It takes all of 10 seconds to swap out the battery. I keep two of them charging back at home base wherever that is and one ready to go in one of my pouches. I just think they're overhyped is all.
regular site
oo
smug site
The one thing the D100 battery pack had that was critical is the voice annnotation button. A rider passed, and you just spoke the horse number into the mic on the last photo of a series and went on. Back in the trailer you just listen and move. Nikon obviously didn't have me and my kind in mind when they left that feature off the MB-D200. (Also, Nikon Editor, part of View, was far superior to Picture Project for basic corrections....) I agree that the battery pack is kind of cheap.
Your suggestion is quite good if there's a weight problem. I wonder how you'd feel this coming Sunday after I'll have been shooting for 8-9hours. All I can do is really use good technique holding it up with my left arm, and masage that right elbow at the end of the day! 3 batteries gets me through the day as well!
www.HoofClix.com / Personal Facebook / Facebook Page
and I do believe its true.. that there are roads left in both of our shoes..