A bend in the river

ruttrutt Registered Users Posts: 6,511 Major grins
edited February 15, 2005 in Wildlife
Poor old Charles River, so much industry for so long, dammed up in so many places, too polluted to swin in or to drink. Still it can be really beautiful sometimes, just as if none of those things were true. This is just below the dam at Newton Lower Falls (site of the original Crane's paper mill in the 18th century) and well above the dam in Waltham.

15880758-L.jpg
If not now, when?

Comments

  • BridgeCityBridgeCity Registered Users Posts: 338 Major grins
    edited February 14, 2005
    Very nice shot. I like how there are really only 3 colors in the photo (and various variations) and yet, it has incredible depth.

    Lots of stuff to look at!
  • Eric&SusanEric&Susan Registered Users Posts: 1,280 Major grins
    edited February 14, 2005
    I like how the two trees frame the shot and help lead my eyes towards the center of the photo and the branches kind of point to the middle as if saying LOOK.


    Eric
    "My dad taught me everything I know, unfortunately he didn't teach me everything he knows" Dale Earnhardt Jr

    It's better to be hated for who you are than to be loved for who you're not.

    http://photosbyeric.smugmug.com
  • pathfinderpathfinder Super Moderators Posts: 14,708 moderator
    edited February 15, 2005
    rutt wrote:
    Poor old Charles River, so much industry for so long, dammed up in so many places, too polluted to swin in or to drink. Still it can be really beautiful sometimes, just as if none of those things were true. This is just below the dam at Newton Lower Falls (site of the original Crane's paper mill in the 18th century) and well above the dam in Waltham.

    15880758-S.jpg


    Nice peaceful image John. You already know that I am a sucker for snow covered river images though. A light coat of snow really covers a multitude of sins and makes many places much more attractive. Even this muddy creek in western Indiana on a grey winter day...
    1616428-M.jpg

    Not as much history here - mostly cornfields - but the bridge this was shot from was originally a covered bridge, but now is just a concrete structure.
    Pathfinder - www.pathfinder.smugmug.com

    Moderator of the Technique Forum and Finishing School on Dgrin
  • HarrybHarryb Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 22,708 Major grins
    edited February 15, 2005
    rutt wrote:
    Poor old Charles River, so much industry for so long, dammed up in so many places, too polluted to swin in or to drink. Still it can be really beautiful sometimes, just as if none of those things were true. This is just below the dam at Newton Lower Falls (site of the original Crane's paper mill in the 18th century) and well above the dam in Waltham.
    I love the composition in this shot. The bend of the river an dthe line of the trees all going ot the upper left.
    Harry
    http://behret.smugmug.com/ NANPA member
    How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
  • ginger_55ginger_55 Registered Users Posts: 8,416 Major grins
    edited February 15, 2005
    I agree. It is a classic Rutt shot, IMO. One similar to the Watch Factory. I get more impressed every time I look at it. I note how he is using tree branches as framing. I think they grow there, doubt he carries them with him.

    Will be interesting how this translates into the "green" season. (I so dislike green, except the first budding green of spring).

    Anyway, this Charles River shot would frame well IMO.

    ginger

    I have tried every which way, but I can't find the meta stuff on this. I just want to know what lens you used, and how wide the shot was. Please. Rutt
    After all is said and done, it is the sweet tea.
  • AngeloAngelo Super Moderators Posts: 8,937 moderator
    edited February 15, 2005
    lovely serene picture. With respect to you and other commenters, I'd like to ask how this might look if you had moved the camera a bit right, eliminating the 2nd tree. Framing with 2 trees in this instance bothers my eye a little.
  • ruttrutt Registered Users Posts: 6,511 Major grins
    edited February 15, 2005
    ginger_55 wrote:
    I have tried every which way, but I can't find the meta stuff on this. I just want to know what lens you used, and how wide the shot was. Please. Rutt
    Thanks for the nice feedback. Far from bringing the branches and trees with me, I've been considering bringing a machate to clear them from the shot.
    One reason I think this is a good shot is that I had just finished shooting XC skiing for a few hours which is demanding and something I haven't really mastered. Then on the way back to the parking lot, I noticed this river view. It seemed so easy compared to trying to capture the skiers at just the right moment and all the exposeure issues and etc.

    Anyway, here is the info on this shot. I used my 24-70 F2.8L and it was as wide as it gets, so on the 1Dmkii, that's equivalent to about 30mm on a full frame 35mm. f10, 1/400, ISO 500. Shot in raw and then I used my snow recipe. No crop.
    If not now, when?
  • CosmicCosmic Registered Users Posts: 219 Major grins
    edited February 15, 2005
    Eric&Susan wrote:
    I like how the two trees frame the shot and help lead my eyes towards the center of the photo and the branches kind of point to the middle as if saying LOOK.


    Eric
    I agree totally with Eric! Nice shot.
    Lead me not into Temptation. I can find the way myself....


Sign In or Register to comment.