180mm
Dick on Aruba
Registered Users Posts: 3,484 Major grins
I may call myself the new proud owner of two new lenses:
1. Nikkor 180mm f/2.8
2. Nikkor 28mm f/2.8
Both are doing really great on my D200, but the 180mm a bit less on my D70. Although my D70 getting old and faulty
(need a replacement very soon), I was hoping they perform as good on the D70 as they do on my D200. Well...no so,
but hereunder the best out of a lot of D70 with 180mm combination.
Next time I will show you the much better D200 with 180mm combination.
Picture # 1 (ISO200)
Picture # 2 (ISO200)
Picture # 3 (ISO200)
Dick.
1. Nikkor 180mm f/2.8
2. Nikkor 28mm f/2.8
Both are doing really great on my D200, but the 180mm a bit less on my D70. Although my D70 getting old and faulty
(need a replacement very soon), I was hoping they perform as good on the D70 as they do on my D200. Well...no so,
but hereunder the best out of a lot of D70 with 180mm combination.
Next time I will show you the much better D200 with 180mm combination.
Picture # 1 (ISO200)
Picture # 2 (ISO200)
Picture # 3 (ISO200)
Dick.
0
Comments
www.intruecolors.com
Nikon D700 x2/D300
Nikon 70-200 2.8/50 1.8/85 1.8/14.24 2.8
Thanks Marina.
Thomas Fuller.
SmugMug account.
Website.
http://behret.smugmug.com/ NANPA member
How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
Yes it is. Thanks Harry.
Thomas Fuller.
SmugMug account.
Website.
Dave
Lake Macquarie NSW Australia
www.bigpix.smugmug.com
Please do not EDIT
my Images
Thomas Fuller.
SmugMug account.
Website.
Nice pics.:D
Well Ric, it's a valid question.
I have a couple of reasons for both lenses.
180mm prime: I choose this lens for flowers, butterflies, small matters / animals and "expressive" shots.
The lens is fairly fast and have nearly no visible distortion and high detail. Good for some bif's too.
28mm prime: Landscaping / architecture but mainly modelling. 50mm don't cut it the most of the time
for modelling.
Understand that I shoot "other things" long before I start to shoot nature pics. The thing is that a lot of
my work does not agree with the rules and regulations of SmugMug (nudity = nature too!) and other work
I sell away the rights of using the pics (commercial documentary / websites)
I think this will answer your question
Dick
Thomas Fuller.
SmugMug account.
Website.
That it does.
Thanks for taking the time to inform me, Dick.
I've recently been thinking that I should try something other than wildlife myself. The trouble with wildlife is the lack of control (at least for me) that one has. Seems like I'm more or less at the same settings all the time because the situation more or less demands it. I can imagine that many just give up on it (wildlife photography) because of the continual frustration that comes with it.
Of course for me, it's the being there that is at least if not more important than the actual captures.
It's true that if you shoot a wider range of subjects, your motivations to shoot wildlife will not degrade.
Personally I have the most pleasure (apart from wildlife) with shooting artistic nudity in natural light. Here I'm free as a bird to shoot according to my mood and can play with the captures the way I want. One thing I learn: Shooting this kind of subjects digitally versus film, is a whole other world. You can safely say that I had to learn all over again to get about the same results.
Commercial shooting is much less interesting because the client makes all the decisions and I have limited freedom, but the money is very welcome.
Dick.
Thomas Fuller.
SmugMug account.
Website.
www.capture-the-pixel.com
Thanks Stephen.
Thomas Fuller.
SmugMug account.
Website.