Wilton House Fisheye + HDR

fatheroftwofatheroftwo Registered Users Posts: 58 Big grins
edited July 25, 2007 in Landscapes
Here are two images of Wilton House using fisheye + HDR:

160469101-L.jpg

160939772-L-2.jpg
Artists have a blank canvass and they create from what they see, whereas photographers take what they see and create something.

f2.smugmug.com

Comments

  • stirfrystirfry Registered Users Posts: 242 Major grins
    edited July 24, 2007
    That lens makes me feel seasick Laughing.gif. That first image is pretty cool though - it actually feels like I'm standing right there under it, looking straight up at a fabulously interesting building.
  • Awais YaqubAwais Yaqub Registered Users Posts: 10,572 Major grins
    edited July 24, 2007
    Great ! loving your photos
    Thine is the beauty of light; mine is the song of fire. Thy beauty exalts the heart; my song inspires the soul. Allama Iqbal

    My Gallery
  • SkippySkippy Registered Users Posts: 12,075 Major grins
    edited July 24, 2007
    fatheroftwo wrote:
    Here are two images of Wilton House using fisheye + HDR:

    I like the distortion, love that last shot thumb.gif .... Skippy :D
    .
    .
    Skippy (Australia) - Moderator of "HOLY MACRO" and "OTHER COOL SHOTS"

    ALBUM http://ozzieskip.smugmug.com/

    :skippy Everyone has the right to be stupid, but some people just abuse the privilege :dgrin
  • cunarder534cunarder534 Registered Users Posts: 346 Major grins
    edited July 24, 2007
    2nd shot is a winner!
    Tim

    My Shots
  • ian408ian408 Administrators Posts: 21,942 moderator
    edited July 24, 2007
    WA is your friend! I totally dig these.
    Moderator Journeys/Sports/Big Picture :: Need some help with dgrin?
  • David_S85David_S85 Administrators Posts: 13,246 moderator
    edited July 25, 2007
    I'm not finding the first shot's HDR conversion very convincing. Too, for lack of a better term, HDR'ish. I also think the WB is somewhat off. The perspective and barrell distortion from that vantage point disturbs to me. Not flattering for the subject. OK, I don't like that shot :D - so shoot me. :gun2 lol3.gif

    However... the second shot's conversion is very even throughout the range and the wide's distortion, which is looks even wider/wilder due to your position centered on the facade, just draws me more into the shot. Very nice! thumb.gif Great clouds too. And you didn't get any blown skies, which I see in far too many HDR's gone wrong, so my compliments in the conversion of both of these. Question, I know those front doors were very close to you - did you clone yourself out of the window reflection?

    Just my 2¢, but with architectural wide shots I either prefer totally straight lines and corrected perspective — or completely wild distortion and uncontrolled fishiness and unusual angles. Between those two styles, minimal distortions rob me from enjoying the structure of the buildings, or the art of the photography.
    My Smugmug
    "You miss 100% of the shots you don't take" - Wayne Gretzky
  • USAIRUSAIR Registered Users Posts: 2,646 Major grins
    edited July 25, 2007
    Both awesome love the fisheye...I don't have but love it
    How did you keep your reflection out of the 2nd photo?

    Fred
    http://www.riverbendphotos.com/
    http://www.facebook.com/Riverbendphotos
  • ivarivar Registered Users Posts: 8,395 Major grins
    edited July 25, 2007
    I like them thumb.gif treatment really seems to suit the building.
    Ivar
    www.ivarborst.nl & smugmug
Sign In or Register to comment.