some recent photos of wee ones-

SystemSystem Registered Users Posts: 8,186 moderator
edited August 21, 2007 in People
184685223-L.jpg


182471768-L.jpg


182040069-L.jpg

Comments

  • urbanariesurbanaries Registered Users Posts: 2,690 Major grins
    edited August 17, 2007
    I love that third one!!! Adorable capture, love the colors and contrast. iloveyou.gif
    Canon 5D MkI
    50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.8, 24-70 2.8L, 35mm 1.4L, 135mm f2L
    ST-E2 Transmitter + (3) 580 EXII + radio poppers
  • k2butterk2butter Registered Users Posts: 259 Major grins
    edited August 17, 2007
    I love them all, I especially love the second one... it just pulls me in... :)
  • Cuties02qCuties02q Registered Users Posts: 643 Major grins
    edited August 17, 2007
    Wow I love the last one!!
    Part time photographer...Full time mommy :D

    My equiment: Nikon D50, Nikon D300, SB-600, 30mm 1.4, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200mm 2.8

    WEBSITE
    BLOG
  • pyrtekpyrtek Registered Users Posts: 539 Major grins
    edited August 17, 2007
    Yup, the last one takes the cake.
  • DavidSDavidS Registered Users Posts: 1,279 Major grins
    edited August 17, 2007
  • FlyingginaFlyinggina Registered Users Posts: 2,639 Major grins
    edited August 18, 2007
    I like all three, each for a different reason.

    I love the treatment in the first one. It captures Nates (?) look but has the feel of a colored chaulk drawing. Personally, I think it is fun to try out different treatments on photographs of children. I wouldn't necessarily offer this kind of thing as a commerical children's photographer (but then I'm not one) and I understand that it isn't everyone's cup of tea, but you have inspired me to play with photos of my granddaughter from time to time and both I and my family members are enjoying the results. Thank you for the inspiration!

    The second is lovely. A bit soft and dreamy it speaks of the simple ageold innocence of the young child.

    Finally, the one of Connor is great. A little attitude showing there. It makes the shot.

    Virginia
    _______________________________________________
    "A photograph is a secret about a secret. The more it tells you, the less you know." Diane Arbus

    Email
  • SwartzySwartzy Registered Users Posts: 3,293 Major grins
    edited August 19, 2007
    Hey George
    #3 rocks buddy. The first one is a bit out there for me (just my taste..Laughing.gif).
    Swartzy:
    NAPP Member | Canon Shooter
    Weddings/Portraits and anything else that catches my eye.
    www.daveswartz.com
    Model Mayhem site http://www.modelmayhem.com/686552
  • ShepsMomShepsMom Registered Users Posts: 4,319 Major grins
    edited August 19, 2007
    Agree with everyone else, #3 is a winner here thumb.gif
    Marina
    www.intruecolors.com
    Nikon D700 x2/D300
    Nikon 70-200 2.8/50 1.8/85 1.8/14.24 2.8
  • SystemSystem Registered Users Posts: 8,186 moderator
    edited August 19, 2007
    thanks all!-
  • MichaelKirkMichaelKirk Registered Users Posts: 427 Major grins
    edited August 21, 2007
    I'll buck the system
    #3 looks fake and over processed - just not real. Looks like you blurred out everything except the face - no natural gradients. If his face is in focus and the back of his head so should be parts of his arms in the same DOF.
    The patch of oof hair on his forehead looks out of place - especially since the back portion of the head in sharp. Not sure what f-stop you shot at and if the oof hair/forhead is processed or not.

    Almost has that head cut-out feeling pasted onto another body.
    Personally I think your PP needs to be a bit more gradual and natural.

    Take these comments with a grain of salt though as I am not much of a people photographer - still learning that.

    Michael

    182040069-L.jpg
  • SystemSystem Registered Users Posts: 8,186 moderator
    edited August 21, 2007
    no sweat, michael-

    the head pasted on thing was mentioned elsewhere-

    re pp: did you miss the first photo on this thread?-

    many do not like my pp; well, I like my pp; I'm very happy with it, but I understand when others don't--


    here's a 'normal' photo:

    181776445-L.jpg


    here's the 'out there' photo:

    181716481-L.jpg

    the first one on this thread was a blend of these two-

    I do appreciate you taking the time to do a critique and offering the suggestions-
Sign In or Register to comment.