Some recent shots.

Jody MelansonJody Melanson Registered Users Posts: 416 Major grins
edited August 18, 2007 in People
1
165883414-O.jpg

2
184632628-O.jpg

3
184632643-O.jpg

4
184632659-O.jpg

5
184654660-O-2.jpg

6
184654666-O.jpg

7
184793701-O.jpg
There is a fine line between a hobby and mental illness!

Comments

  • pyrtekpyrtek Registered Users Posts: 539 Major grins
    edited August 17, 2007
    The PP on these is completely overboard, which is a shame, because the
    model and the poses are really nice.
  • Scott_QuierScott_Quier Registered Users Posts: 6,524 Major grins
    edited August 17, 2007
    pyrtek wrote:
    The PP on these is completely overboard, which is a shame, because the
    model and the poses are really nice.
    Bernard - please don't take this as a slam or anything negative. I looked at these photos and really liked them and didn't see evidence of too much PP. To educate me, if no one else, can you expand on your comment with a couple of specific comments - pointing to specific instances in these photos that exhibit what you are talking about. I feel really dense and want to correct that.

    Thanks
  • J KaceyJ Kacey Registered Users Posts: 114 Major grins
    edited August 18, 2007
    I like the PP on these thumb.gif Good job! I hope to see more
  • SkippySkippy Registered Users Posts: 12,075 Major grins
    edited August 18, 2007
    1

    Very nice work Jody, I love the last shot out of the series :D
    Thanks for sharing ..... Skippy
    .
    .
    Skippy (Australia) - Moderator of "HOLY MACRO" and "OTHER COOL SHOTS"

    ALBUM http://ozzieskip.smugmug.com/

    :skippy Everyone has the right to be stupid, but some people just abuse the privilege :dgrin
  • pyrtekpyrtek Registered Users Posts: 539 Major grins
    edited August 18, 2007
    Bernard - please don't take this as a slam or anything negative.


    Not at all. :)

    I looked at these photos and really liked them


    For the record, so did I. Especially the last two.

    and didn't see evidence of too much PP. To educate me, if no one else, can you expand
    on your comment with a couple of specific comments - pointing to specific
    instances in these photos that exhibit what you are talking about. I feel really
    dense and want to correct that.


    Whether there is too much PP or not is, of course, a matter of opinion. I think
    it's overdone in these, especially on the first picture. Specifically:

    • Her eyes look unnatural. The whites are too white and they're completely
      flat (you can also see this in the left part of the right eye of the pretty lady
      in picture 4).
    • The areas under her eyes are way too smooth.
    • In fact, her whole face is too smooth. There is not a single wrinkle on her
      entire face. It looks unnatural. The extreme smoothness works in pictures like
      the last two, because they're high-key(ish), but it doesn't work (in my opinion)
      on skin with so much texture.


    But, again, this is just my opinion. I like the photos anyway, and I think the
    models are beautiful. They don't need any PP, as far as I'm concerned. :)
  • Jeff_MiloJeff_Milo Registered Users Posts: 327 Major grins
    edited August 18, 2007
    After staring at these pictures for quite a while I am going to have to agree with Bernard on the pp. I like the photos, and most of the poses (love 6 & 7). They are beautiful girls, but there is a fake, air brushed quality about there faces and eyes they are almost to perfect.
    Jeff Milo
    MILOStudios


    www.milophotostudios.com
Sign In or Register to comment.