Canon 1Ds MKIII

gus

David_S85 wrote:

Yikes! So is the 1DsIII. That was unexpected. :huh

And the crowd are going wild! :rofl

But suddenly the crowd saw the price tag on the 1DsIII ...18 ran screaming from the tent...6 went into fibrillation on the spot & andy bought 4 to be collected 3 months apart from each other once the previous one has been sold.

$13K AUD so i guess about $12K USD or there-abouts.



.

Andy

gus wrote:

$13K AUD so i guess about $12K USD or there-abouts.
.

$8K USD

ziggy53

Canon 1Ds MKIII
I thought we should have a thread just about this amazing new camera body from Canon.

ziggy53

Official Canon USA link
http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ModelInfoAct&fcategoryid=139&modelid=15710

(Thanks to z_28 for originally finding the link.)

ziggy53

Preview:

http://www.dpreview.com/news/0708/07082009canoneos1dsmarkiii.asp

Peter Dumont

It does make one wonder:
It does make one wonder:

"Do I really need this camera ?"


(stupid question of course )

Peter Dumont

claudermilk

gus wrote:

But suddenly the crowd saw the price tag on the 1DsIII ...18 ran screaming from the tent...6 went into fibrillation on the spot & andy bought 4 to be collected 3 months apart from each other once the previous one has been sold.

$13K AUD so i guess about $12K USD or there-abouts.



.

:lol4

The difference between 35mm-format DSLRs and digital MF back just got narrower...like paper-thin. :wowA quick comparison: 1Ds Mk III, 21.1MP $8k, ZD back, 21.5MP, $9k (Plus the ~$4k body). I would say Canon just scared the poo out of all their competition. Nice that they aren't resting on their laurels as market leader, but pushing everyone else this hard.

Now to see what the response is. Good times (at least for we customers). :lurk

ziggy53

Make no mistake, the Canon 1Ds MKIII is a ground-breaking, landmark camera that will have the same impact on the photographic community as the 1Ds MKII had when it was introduced.

The overall shooting performance is just astonishing. If there are no major problems with this camera, it will become the darling of commercial, wedding and portrait photographers the world over.

People will skip meals and new car purchases just to acquire this beast. The obsessive nature of some will require it, because it is the best in its class.

It will be interesting to see how the competitors react, but overall, this is pointing to possibilities I can only imagine.

Andy

ziggy53 wrote:

it will become the darling of commercial, wedding and portrait photographers the world over.

And landscapers, too

ziggy53

Andy wrote:

And landscapers, too

Can you imagine the "stitching" possibilities?

(I bet you are thinking those thoughts right now. )

chrisjlee

Finally a whole set of cameras with dust cleaning. Sucks to be eclipse or whoever makes the crap to clean cameras.

sirsloop

You may be suprised to find out that the cleaning mechanism on these bodies really doesn't do much. Ya know... panasonic put it on their bodies so Canon does too.

patch29

Here is a sample image.

jthomas

Wait 'til we here from the N-guys later this week. They've got something cookin' too.

ziggy53

patch29 wrote:

Here is a sample image.

EXIF shows it was shot with an 85mm lens at f1.8. The eyelashes are sharp.

Do you think that $8000 camera used a $350 lens to make this image? (I know, probably the $1800 f1.2L, but I can dream.)

Which yields a valid point, how many lenses are "worthy" of this camera?

Andy

ziggy53 wrote:

EXIF shows it was shot with an 85mm lens at f1.8. The eyelashes are sharp.

Do you think that $8000 camera used a $350 lens to make this image? (I know, probably the $1800 f1.2L, but I can dream.)

Which yields a valid point, how many lenses are "worthy" of this camera?

I use the 85 f/1.8 on 1Ds Mark II plenty. It's a super lens. I'm sure it'd make great images on the 1Ds Mark III, too.

LiquidAir

ziggy53 wrote:

EXIF shows it was shot with an 85mm lens at f1.8. The eyelashes are sharp.

Do you think that $8000 camera used a $350 lens to make this image? (I know, probably the $1800 f1.2L, but I can dream.)

Which yields a valid point, how many lenses are "worthy" of this camera?

A 20MP full frame sensor has the same resolving power as an 8MP APS-C sensor. How many lenses are worthy of a 30D? It'll certainly stress the corner performance of the wider angle lenses, but other than that, think 30D resolving power with a wider field of view to get the extra pixels.

evoryware

Re: dust cleaning
Compared to my 300 and XT using same lenses, I've never had to pull out my Giottos to clean dust from my XTi.

Peter Dumont

85mm f/1.8 ROCKS !

Andy wrote:

I use the 85 f/1.8 on 1Ds Mark II plenty. It's a super lens. I'm sure it'd make great images on the 1Ds Mark III, too.

I use it on my 5D and it's a great lens !:ivar

patch29

ziggy53 wrote:

EXIF shows it was shot with an 85mm lens at f1.8. The eyelashes are sharp.

Do you think that $8000 camera used a $350 lens to make this image? (I know, probably the $1800 f1.2L, but I can dream.)

Which yields a valid point, how many lenses are "worthy" of this camera?

The full EXIF shows they shot it with the 85/1.2 II at f/1.8.

claudermilk

ファイル名 portrait.jpg Tv (シャッター速度) 1/320 秒 Av (絞り数値) F1.8 ISO感度 ISO100 レンズ EF85mm F1.2L II USM

This is copied right off the web page--says the 85L. No surprise there.

It's a great shot, but doesn't surprise me. While there's lots more pixels to play with, I'd expect the same quality out of a Mk II. Heck, I'd expect similar quality out of my 20D for that matter.