First of all, how do you manage to sneak up on these guys?
Second of all, how do you get them to stay put if you dangle a flower behind them to get the background?
Third, what's the red thingymadoodie on the back of that one?
Fourth... Nice mugshot on the fourth one down! A face only a mother could love.
First of all, how do you manage to sneak up on these guys?
Second of all, how do you get them to stay put if you dangle a flower behind them to get the background?
Third, what's the red thingymadoodie on the back of that one?
Fourth... Nice mugshot on the fourth one down! A face only a mother could love.
The man is a Bug Whisperer Schmooo yup, I'm convinced
... Skippy
.
__________________________________________________
it's not the size of the lens that matters... It's how you focus it.
aaaaa.... who am I kidding!
whoever dies with the biggest coolest piece of glass, wins!
0
Lord VetinariRegistered UsersPosts: 15,901Major grins
edited August 22, 2007
Thanks for the kind comments everyone - I do appreciate them
Skippy all the shots were taken with an MPE-65 using flash and all were focus stacked from 2 to 5 shots except #1 (no focus stacking). Shot between 1.5:1 and 3:1 magnification.
Schmoo
"First of all, how do you manage to sneak up on these guys?
Second of all, how do you get them to stay put if you dangle a flower behind them to get the background?
Third, what's the red thingymadoodie on the back of that one?"
1. You just need to move in slowly on flies and see how they react. Sometimes they do fly away and sometimes they don't. The more occupied they are the easier they are to approach hence #1. The colder they are the less likely they are to fly- these were all shot in the morning, and the smaller the flies are the less likely it is they will take any notice of you.
2. Putting a flower behind them actually disturbs them more than putting a camera lens in front of them, but as I was doing flower refraction shots when most of these were shot, you might as well try
3. The red blob in #5 is not a school satchel but probably a parasitic mite. It's definitely a mite but often they are not parasitic- just hitching a lift somewhere else, but the posture of this (head down) and the bloated abdomen suggest it is a parasite.
I think that the Canon MP-E 65 mm f/2.8 is a full-frame lens?
If true, wouldn't you multiply the lens-designated magnification by the crop factor of the camera, assuming a crop camera was used?
Thanks,
Hi Ziggy,
Yes the MPE-65 is a full frame lens but like any other macro lens the magnification ratio is expressed as size of image on the sensor compared to the original object so the sensor size is irrelevent. ie 1:1 magnification means 1cm of subject appears as 1cm of image on the sensor.
What is affected however is the print magnification. ie a 6*4 print from a full frame camera will appear less magnified than the same print taken with a 1.6 crop camera.
Brian V.
Hi Ziggy,
Yes the MPE-65 is a full frame lens but like any other macro lens the magnification ratio is expressed as size of image on the sensor compared to the original object so the sensor size is irrelevent. ie 1:1 magnification means 1cm of subject appears as 1cm of image on the sensor.
What is affected however is the print magnification. ie a 6*4 print from a full frame camera will appear less magnified than the same print taken with a 1.6 crop camera.
Brian V.
thumb An excellent explabation!
Wonderful series, BTW. You have really developed your craft into consistantly superb images.
Comments
First of all, how do you manage to sneak up on these guys?
Second of all, how do you get them to stay put if you dangle a flower behind them to get the background?
Third, what's the red thingymadoodie on the back of that one?
Fourth... Nice mugshot on the fourth one down! A face only a mother could love.
Photos that don't suck / 365 / Film & Lomography
My Gallery
GreyLeaf PhotoGraphy
The man is a Bug Whisperer Schmooo yup, I'm convinced
... Skippy
.
Skippy (Australia) - Moderator of "HOLY MACRO" and "OTHER COOL SHOTS"
ALBUM http://ozzieskip.smugmug.com/
:skippy Everyone has the right to be stupid, but some people just abuse the privilege :dgrin
Details, details, need details
Are these stacked ?
MPE-65 used, or other lens combination ?
Fly number #5 is that a parisite attached to him,
or just part of his body ?
They all look fantastic Brian
You amaze me how you can find so many bugs to shoot.
Another Excellent Series my friend .... Skippy
.
Skippy (Australia) - Moderator of "HOLY MACRO" and "OTHER COOL SHOTS"
ALBUM http://ozzieskip.smugmug.com/
:skippy Everyone has the right to be stupid, but some people just abuse the privilege :dgrin
Nice work, as always.
Dgrin FAQ | Me | Workshops
Lol ,I think I agree with you Skippy
Regards Dave.
http://DavidRodgers.naturescapes.net.
http://DavidRodgers.smugmug.com
Hey man, how i sayd you are the Macro master...
Amazing shot my friend!
Canon 1D MKIII|Canon 5D MKII | Canon 16-35 2.8|Canon 85m 1.2 L II | Canon MP-E 2.8| Canon 70-200 2.8|Canon 100 F2.8 L IS | Canon 300m 2.8 L IS |Canon Tc 2x II | Canon TC 1.4 X | MT24X
Flickr - www.flickr.com/photos/phr3ck
Website - www.wildlifeshot.com
You always amaze me!
www.seanmartinphoto.com
__________________________________________________
it's not the size of the lens that matters... It's how you focus it.
aaaaa.... who am I kidding!
whoever dies with the biggest coolest piece of glass, wins!
Skippy all the shots were taken with an MPE-65 using flash and all were focus stacked from 2 to 5 shots except #1 (no focus stacking). Shot between 1.5:1 and 3:1 magnification.
Schmoo
"First of all, how do you manage to sneak up on these guys?
Second of all, how do you get them to stay put if you dangle a flower behind them to get the background?
Third, what's the red thingymadoodie on the back of that one?"
1. You just need to move in slowly on flies and see how they react. Sometimes they do fly away and sometimes they don't. The more occupied they are the easier they are to approach hence #1. The colder they are the less likely they are to fly- these were all shot in the morning, and the smaller the flies are the less likely it is they will take any notice of you.
2. Putting a flower behind them actually disturbs them more than putting a camera lens in front of them, but as I was doing flower refraction shots when most of these were shot, you might as well try
3. The red blob in #5 is not a school satchel but probably a parasitic mite. It's definitely a mite but often they are not parasitic- just hitching a lift somewhere else, but the posture of this (head down) and the bloated abdomen suggest it is a parasite.
Brian V.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lordv/
http://www.lordv.smugmug.com/
I think that the Canon MP-E 65 mm f/2.8 is a full-frame lens?
If true, wouldn't you multiply the lens-designated magnification by the crop factor of the camera, assuming a crop camera was used?
Thanks,
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
Yes the MPE-65 is a full frame lens but like any other macro lens the magnification ratio is expressed as size of image on the sensor compared to the original object so the sensor size is irrelevent. ie 1:1 magnification means 1cm of subject appears as 1cm of image on the sensor.
What is affected however is the print magnification. ie a 6*4 print from a full frame camera will appear less magnified than the same print taken with a 1.6 crop camera.
Brian V.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lordv/
http://www.lordv.smugmug.com/
thumb An excellent explabation!
Wonderful series, BTW. You have really developed your craft into consistantly superb images.
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums