Mommy and baby

amscoutamscout Registered Users Posts: 35 Big grins
edited September 5, 2007 in People
My son was a little over a month old when my husband took this. It was actually not posed and an accident, he had just bought the Konica Minolta and was trying to figure out how it worked...they're not good quality but just b/c it was a natural pic that I can never have again, it's special to me.
Original:
ph-10003.jpg
Touched up as much as possible:
ph-10003_edited.jpg
Amanda-fulltime mommy, fulltime student, parttime photographer
Nikon D-80

Comments

  • SenecaSeneca Registered Users Posts: 1,661 Major grins
    edited September 5, 2007
    It is very blurry. I would convert to B&W. Beautiful baby!
  • amscoutamscout Registered Users Posts: 35 Big grins
    edited September 5, 2007
    Seneca wrote:
    It is very blurry. I would convert to B&W. Beautiful baby!

    AWWW, thanks. I think the same! Not that I'm biased or anything....does this look better?

    ph-10003-1.jpg
    Amanda-fulltime mommy, fulltime student, parttime photographer
    Nikon D-80
  • photocatphotocat Registered Users Posts: 1,334 Major grins
    edited September 5, 2007
    I would dare crop it down... It is blurred, but it is an emotional photograph, so a keeper...
    my version is really tiny, the quality is lousy, I needed a small file to be able to attach it to the mail. You could do the same picture without the grain, if you start from a better original...
    http://photocatseyes.net
    http://www.zazzle.com/photocatseyes
  • SenecaSeneca Registered Users Posts: 1,661 Major grins
    edited September 5, 2007
    amscout wrote:
    AWWW, thanks. I think the same! Not that I'm biased or anything....does this look better?

    ph-10003-1.jpg

    I think that works better. thumb.gif
Sign In or Register to comment.