I would like an AF-S version of the 80-400 and a 300 F/4 with VR. I would also like a 400 F/4 telephoto lens added to their line-up.
I also like Thom Hogan's take on Nikon's lens line-up.
Harry http://behret.smugmug.com/NANPA member How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
That would be hard as their seems to be a crowd leaving Canon and heading over to Nikon at the moment.
Harry http://behret.smugmug.com/NANPA member How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
I wasn't talking about the difficulty level of a switch, just couldn't find a rationale for a switch.
I also can't find a reson for a Nikon related thread to get hi-jacked into a Canon/Nikon thingie again. Why does this happen so frequently with Nikon related threads. I haven't seen a Nikon user jump into a Canon lens thread with this kind of stuff.
Harry http://behret.smugmug.com/NANPA member How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
I also can't find a reson for a Nikon related thread to get hi-jacked into a Canon/Nikon thingie again. Why does this happen so frequently with Nikon related threads. I haven't seen a Nikon user jump into a Canon lens thread with this kind of stuff.
Ah, the self-affirming feedback loop.
Let them have their fun (and enjoy a larger lens catalog . . . ).
I wasn't talking about the difficulty level of a switch, just couldn't find a rationale for a switch.
I also can't find a reson for a Nikon related thread to get hi-jacked into a Canon/Nikon thingie again. Why does this happen so frequently with Nikon related threads. I haven't seen a Nikon user jump into a Canon lens thread with this kind of stuff.
canon shooters are just scared of a nikon shoot and his big, black ...
.
.
.
lens
are AF-S lenses significantly better? It's all I own, but something I'll be sure to look for as I acquire more lenses if it's that important.
I make it policy to never let ignorance stand in the way of my opinion. ~Justiceiro
"Your decisions on whether to buy, when to buy and what to buy should depend on careful consideration of your needs primarily, with a little of your wants thrown in for enjoyment, After all photography is a hobby, even for pros." ~Herbert Keppler
are AF-S lenses significantly better? It's all I own, but something I'll be sure to look for as I acquire more lenses if it's that important.
If you want fast AF AF-S is very important. My only real complaint with the 80-400 is its inability to hold AF on a subject.
Harry http://behret.smugmug.com/NANPA member How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
AF-S NIKKOR 14-24mm f/2.8G ED
AF-S NIKKOR 24-70mm f/2.8G ED
Comments on these beauties?
The new super teles have no interest for me as I already have the 500mm f/4. I have always felt that VR on superteles that you shoot off a tripod is like wheels on a frog. Its OK but not really necessary. Also I don't want to see my wife's reaction when I tell her how much one of those babies cost. :yikes
Now the 14-24mm f/2.8 has my interest. It can easily replace my 17-35 f/2.8.
Harry http://behret.smugmug.com/NANPA member How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
Nikon needs to make more lenses. Just a few off the top of my head: AF-S 400 f/5.6, numerous DX primes, AF-S 85 f/1.4. What else?
1-3mm f/0.5, just off the top of my head. AFS Vr Os IF N sjidjkashjashd etc etc... and lets make it a dx. i want to save some weight off my new lenses.
1-3mm f/0.5, just off the top of my head. AFS Vr Os IF N sjidjkashjashd etc etc... and lets make it a dx. i want to save some weight off my new lenses.
If you had a "serious" request of Nikon, what might that be?
I think that the the world needs more fisheye lenses myself. While Nikon has some really splendid examples already, inexpensive fisheye lenses could be produced, and most of the Nikon "fish" lenses are pretty expensive.
I suggest that a 10mm, f5.6 DX fisheye could be built to sell for around $250 and would probably be a pretty big seller.
If you had a "serious" request of Nikon, what might that be?
I think that the the world needs more fisheye lenses myself. While Nikon has some really splendid examples already, inexpensive fisheye lenses could be produced, and most of the Nikon "fish" lenses are pretty expensive.
I suggest that a 10mm, f5.6 DX fisheye could be built to sell for around $250 and would probably be a pretty big seller.
Yep... 10-14mm non-DX FE would be great! 2.8 would be sweeeet... and 3.5 would still be usable. But 10/5.6 would be quite slow there Zig. I don't know that you wouldn't need to pod in indoor like situations. Just that this is where I would really see something like this shine...
Yep... 10-14mm non-DX FE would be great! 2.8 would be sweeeet....
Here! Here!
And add VR to the new 24-70mm. Seems like an oversight not to have VR as an option for that lens...but it may have made it larger and it seems that Nikon was going for compactness.
Comments
XTi, G9, 16-35/2.8L, 100-300USM, 70-200/4L, 19-35, 580EX II, CP-E3, 500/8 ...
DSC-R1, HFL-F32X ... ; AG-DVX100B and stuff ... (I like this 10 years old signature :^)
I also like Thom Hogan's take on Nikon's lens line-up.
http://behret.smugmug.com/ NANPA member
How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
That would be hard as their seems to be a crowd leaving Canon and heading over to Nikon at the moment.
http://behret.smugmug.com/ NANPA member
How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
So switch will be very easy not that hard !
XTi, G9, 16-35/2.8L, 100-300USM, 70-200/4L, 19-35, 580EX II, CP-E3, 500/8 ...
DSC-R1, HFL-F32X ... ; AG-DVX100B and stuff ... (I like this 10 years old signature :^)
I wasn't talking about the difficulty level of a switch, just couldn't find a rationale for a switch.
I also can't find a reson for a Nikon related thread to get hi-jacked into a Canon/Nikon thingie again. Why does this happen so frequently with Nikon related threads. I haven't seen a Nikon user jump into a Canon lens thread with this kind of stuff.
http://behret.smugmug.com/ NANPA member
How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
Ah, the self-affirming feedback loop.
Let them have their fun (and enjoy a larger lens catalog . . . ).
Signed,
Happy Nikon User
canon shooters are just scared of a nikon shoot and his big, black ...
.
.
.
lens
- my photography: www.dangin.com
- my blog: www.dangin.com/blog
- follow me on twitter: @danginphoto
Actually you was.
Whatever.
XTi, G9, 16-35/2.8L, 100-300USM, 70-200/4L, 19-35, 580EX II, CP-E3, 500/8 ...
DSC-R1, HFL-F32X ... ; AG-DVX100B and stuff ... (I like this 10 years old signature :^)
"Your decisions on whether to buy, when to buy and what to buy should depend on careful consideration of your needs primarily, with a little of your wants thrown in for enjoyment, After all photography is a hobby, even for pros."
~Herbert Keppler
If you want fast AF AF-S is very important. My only real complaint with the 80-400 is its inability to hold AF on a subject.
http://behret.smugmug.com/ NANPA member
How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
http://press.nikonusa.com/2007/08/nikon_adds_three_new_supertele.php
AF-S NIKKOR 400mm f/2.8G ED VR
AF-S NIKKOR 500mm f/4G ED VR
AF-S NIKKOR 600mm f/4G ED VR
http://press.nikonusa.com/2007/08/professional_zoom_lenses_enter.php
AF-S NIKKOR 14-24mm f/2.8G ED
AF-S NIKKOR 24-70mm f/2.8G ED
Comments on these beauties?
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
The new super teles have no interest for me as I already have the 500mm f/4. I have always felt that VR on superteles that you shoot off a tripod is like wheels on a frog. Its OK but not really necessary. Also I don't want to see my wife's reaction when I tell her how much one of those babies cost. :yikes
Now the 14-24mm f/2.8 has my interest. It can easily replace my 17-35 f/2.8.
http://behret.smugmug.com/ NANPA member
How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
Agreed. Though you might want to check out the Sigma 30 f/1.4 for an AF-S/HSM prime.
Very nice. And very, very far beyond what I can afford, hence my interest in a AF-S 400 f/5.6.
The 14-24 is a welcome addition and will probably be useful on both DX and FX bodies. It has no filter threads however, which has many all a twitter.
1-3mm f/0.5, just off the top of my head. AFS Vr Os IF N sjidjkashjashd etc etc... and lets make it a dx. i want to save some weight off my new lenses.
If you had a "serious" request of Nikon, what might that be?
I think that the the world needs more fisheye lenses myself. While Nikon has some really splendid examples already, inexpensive fisheye lenses could be produced, and most of the Nikon "fish" lenses are pretty expensive.
I suggest that a 10mm, f5.6 DX fisheye could be built to sell for around $250 and would probably be a pretty big seller.
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
Here! Here!
And add VR to the new 24-70mm. Seems like an oversight not to have VR as an option for that lens...but it may have made it larger and it seems that Nikon was going for compactness.