"Distressed Portraits"
Both of these were taken mid morning and I processed them with CS2 using an action from adobe's website and some other minor adjustments, I'm hoping for some constructive criticism and also any comments you may have. Thanks for your time.
1.
2.
1.
2.
awmphoto.smugmug.com
0
Comments
considering the light you shot in, I think they're great!-
but I'm no expert-
hopefully, you'll get some c&c from the good folks here at dgrin-
Well, the treatment is 'groovy' and all, but the reality refuses to go away And the reality is that those two fine fellows look happy and posing and not gloomy at all... In other words - this is a classical case of using PP for the sake of PP without paying too much attention to the actual photography.
What's my 'constructive' bit, then? But of course - here it is: wonders of PP are easy to get entangled in, but the incredible power of photography (as opposed to, say, painting) comes from it (photography) being a depiction of something real . PP is there to merely help enhance the sense of 'realness' (when needed).
All that is just MY opinion, and while we're at it - both shots are nice.
"...turtles are great speed enthusiasts, which is natural"
J.Cortazar
Rundadar - Your honest criticism was exactly what I was looking for, thanks for your honesty and in the future I'll try harder to move from the posed and over PP to "keeping it real".
If anyone else has any comments on how to improve I would love to hear. Thanks again.
I really do like the treatments you used- but again ask yourself what do you want the pictures to communicate and then go at it again.
The other shot is a little awkward- like he was a little embarrased to have his piccie shot because he hadn't practiced his smile in front of the mirror that morning- a little Napoleon Dynamite/ Jr Hi feel in the goofy smile.
Keep on shooting and practicing that PP! It will amaze you what you can accomplish!