Options

Best ISO/Av/Tv for Concerts

TZZDCTZZDC Registered Users Posts: 23 Big grins
edited November 5, 2007 in Technique
What does everyone else that shoots concerts tend to shoot with to get more keepers? I'm shooting with a 1D Mark II N + 70-200 f/2.8L IS or 24-70 f/2.8L and I'm usually forced to 1600 ISO 2.8 in Av and anywhere from 1/20th sec to 1/250th sec. Basically its not making as many keepers as I'd like and aside from shooting hand held or monopod I've almost found that bumping the EV to -2 or -3 sometimes lets me shoot the 1/125th - 1/200th range or stop down to f/3.5 or heck even ISO 800. I've never been able to figure out why the -2 or -3 work..

I just wanted to know what everyone else shoots with and its definitely not like I have a lot of light.
Gear:
Canon EOS 1D Mk IIN & 5D | 17-40 f/4L | 24-70 f/2.8L | 70-200 f/2.8L IS
www.polskiobscura.com

Comments

  • Options
    OsirisPhotoOsirisPhoto Registered Users Posts: 367 Major grins
    edited October 27, 2007
    OK, I've never shot a concert.. but have shot low-light indoors. Just out of bed after first nightshift, so i apologise in advance if I'm missing something here, but what's wrong with shooting ISO 1600? You get more noise, but nothing that should be a deal breaker on a Canonne_nau.gif

    You use an 'L' lens (one with IS).. so optical quality shouldn't be an issue headscratch.gif

    Underexposing is just a way of telling the camera "hey, I know you think I need all that light.. but I'll do without it" so lets you increase the shutter speed.

    Is it image quality or specifically camera shake that's the problem?

    1/250s should be quick enough at 200mm, and 1/20s might do for shorter focal lengths if your hand-holding is well practised.
  • Options
    BeachBillBeachBill Registered Users Posts: 1,311 Major grins
    edited October 28, 2007
    The problem is that you are letting the camera decide how to shoot the scene while in Av or Tv mode, and the camera is going to get it wrong. You need to be shooting in manual mode.
    Bill Gerrard Photography - Facebook - Interview - SmugRoom: Useful Tools for SmugMug
  • Options
    TZZDCTZZDC Registered Users Posts: 23 Big grins
    edited October 29, 2007
    Thank you for the advice I know I should be using manual more often and I get lazy controling DOF or shutter speed since I'd rather be focused on the action and what I'm capturing then second guessing what combo of shutter speed and aperture I've programmed in when the actions changing.

    I might give it a shot in this up coming concert I have on the 31st
    Gear:
    Canon EOS 1D Mk IIN & 5D | 17-40 f/4L | 24-70 f/2.8L | 70-200 f/2.8L IS
    www.polskiobscura.com
  • Options
    cletuscletus Registered Users Posts: 1,930 Major grins
    edited October 29, 2007
    TZZDC wrote:
    ... I've almost found that bumping the EV to -2 or -3 sometimes lets me shoot the 1/125th - 1/200th range or stop down to f/3.5 or heck even ISO 800. I've never been able to figure out why the -2 or -3 work..

    I just wanted to know what everyone else shoots with and its definitely not like I have a lot of light.
    If I had to make a guess: Most concerts are going to have lots of very, very dark background with small pools of light on the performers. All that dark background tricks the meter into over exposing the whole shot. When you dial in -2 to -3 stops of exposure you're compensating for the meter's tendency to over expose.

    You might put the meter into spot mode and try to meter off the performers.

    Here is an old concert pic. Nikon F5, 80-200 f/2.8, TMAX 3200 @ ISO-3200. IIRC I used aperture priority and spot metering.
    104076127-M.jpg
  • Options
    i_worship_the_Kingi_worship_the_King Registered Users Posts: 548 Major grins
    edited October 29, 2007
    I shot the symphony in Av, ISO800, aperture wide open (and me wishing wider), 1/25ish, on occasion -.7 compensation (I use the ringed metering).

    The best glass I had was f3.5, so if you're shooting f2.8 you should be able to get some good shots. However, we have the worst lighting in the WORLD on the MU stage - it's meant to be focused on spots around the floor to draw attention to theatre performances - for the orchestra all it did was create spots with more & less light - bad for me...

    Best of luck!
    I make it policy to never let ignorance stand in the way of my opinion. ~Justiceiro

    "Your decisions on whether to buy, when to buy and what to buy should depend on careful consideration of your needs primarily, with a little of your wants thrown in for enjoyment, After all photography is a hobby, even for pros."
    ~Herbert Keppler
  • Options
    HiSPLHiSPL Registered Users Posts: 251 Major grins
    edited October 29, 2007
    I don't meter anything in camera when shooting a concert. The lighting at a concert has such a huge dynamic range that it is impossible to capture it all with digital or film.

    The best technique I have found is this;

    Shoot manual and at the widest aperture you can (f2.8 in your case). ISO 1600 is fine on Canon gear and is getting better on Nikon too. Take a shot and view the histogram looking for blowouts on your subject. Adjust your shutter speed to avoid blowouts and then shoot away. This usually yields about a 1/125th at f4 for me.

    144728374-L.jpg

    210251954-L.jpg

    HTH!
  • Options
    wxwaxwxwax Registered Users Posts: 15,471 Major grins
    edited October 29, 2007
    Lighting can vary an awful lot from club to club. It can also be heavy in one channel and negligible in the others. Just make sure you're not overexposing a color channel.


    ISO 1600
    1/125
    f2.0
    133579307-M.jpg

    ISO 1600
    1/100
    f2.0
    30413215-M.jpg

    ISO 1250
    1/125
    f1.8
    46768587-M.jpg
    Sid.
    Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
    http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au
  • Options
    ccpickreccpickre Registered Users Posts: 385 Major grins
    edited November 5, 2007
    I may be a new guy, but concerts have been something I have thrown myself into, because someday I would love for the Rolling Stone to hunt me down and beg me to shoot for them :D

    Anyway, I started using my XTi for all my concerts. Had a 17-50 2.8 and a 70-200 2.8. I RARELY use 1600 anymore, but when I didn't know any better about RAW, I tended to rely on 1600. Now I shoot 800, and only use 1600 for sports.

    I shoot the widest possible aperture, and shoot between 1/400 and 1/200 (I try to avoid going below 1/200, but sometimes you can get away with it, unless it's a REALLY rocking concert). 1/20 on the small lens may easy to handhold, but if you shoot some of the concerts I have, 1/20 will NEVER get a good shot.

    I haven't had a chance to try my 40D with a concert yet, but I have 2 or 3 concerts this week alone on campus. All the photos below are just a plain Rebel XTi.

    Here are some from my first concert. Unfortunately they're a little over exposed (partly because it was my first concert, and partly because I didn't understand Photoshop much yet).

    159961964-L.jpg
    174872448-L.jpg
    159962058-L.jpg
    159962070-L.jpg
    174873510-L.jpg
    159962224-L.jpg
    159962281-L.jpg
    159962494-L.jpg
    159961890-L.jpg
    I'm sure I could go back and reedit them, but I'm too tired.

    Here are a few from the Jazz Fest in Indy this past summer (again, my photoshop skills were lax)

    171706438-L.jpg
    174871198-L.jpg
    171706634-L.jpg

    And here's one from Little 500 that I really liked

    149897681-L-2.jpg
    Vi Veri Vniversum Vivus Vici
Sign In or Register to comment.