Bit dark :hide Got any that have the same left and bottom edges but are portrait so there are more trees on top?
Thanks everyone for the comments.
Nick, I agree. It's a bit dark for me too. About 5 minutes after the shot I needed a flashlight to see my way out of the park.
This was a 30 second exposure and the winds paused just long enough for the pic. Any longer of an exposure and the branches would had been moving.
As far as the crop, all the limbs above this photo were bare.
I would had loved to had been here a week or two earlier during peak season but some photography group scheduled a trip to Glacier National Park and I couldn't pass it up.
Comments
Dave
Cheers,
“PHOTOGRAPHY IS THE ‘JAZZ’ FOR THE EYES…”
http://jwear.smugmug.com/
SmugMug Technical Account Manager
Travel = good. Woo, shooting!
nickwphoto
Thanks everyone for the comments.
Nick, I agree. It's a bit dark for me too. About 5 minutes after the shot I needed a flashlight to see my way out of the park.
This was a 30 second exposure and the winds paused just long enough for the pic. Any longer of an exposure and the branches would had been moving.
As far as the crop, all the limbs above this photo were bare.
I would had loved to had been here a week or two earlier during peak season but some photography group scheduled a trip to Glacier National Park and I couldn't pass it up.
www.adamstravelphotography.com
Facebook
As a whole I personally dislike prolonged exposure of water. I realise it is a personal thing.
This may have been a good candidate for a HDR using bracketed expsures at higher ISO.
Ted Szukalski - Gallery of Digital Photography
Vote for me on Cool Photoblogs
Crop the waterfall out of the picture???
www.adamstravelphotography.com
Facebook