Same birds, better? Comments?

ginger_55ginger_55 Registered Users Posts: 8,416 Major grins
edited March 7, 2005 in Wildlife
I picked a couple of different ones, and I did less in post. To be exact, I did not crop them so tight, and I did not add red, so those bills might look more natural. Their feathers still look dirty IMO, but I don't know what to do about that. This first one is as I first saw them. I always take one of those to prove they were there in case they fly away. Let me know if this is better, please, ginger

17048232-L.jpg


17048241-L.jpg


Below is "Ruffled Feathers". The wind can really blow on the beach and the marsh. I hope it doesn't keep this up. One spring it blew the whole time and on into summer.


17048247-L.jpg

I think these look sharper without as much post,?, and I was careful not to post any that were not as sharp as they got. The DOF was not great, so it was difficult to post two birds at once. It was on about F8. That was the 300 Prime with the 1.4 extender on it, about 420.

g
After all is said and done, it is the sweet tea.

Comments

  • HarrybHarryb Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 22,708 Major grins
    edited March 7, 2005
    ginger_55 wrote:
    I picked a couple of different ones, and I did less in post. To be exact, I did not crop them so tight, and I did not add red, so those bills might look more natural. Their feathers still look dirty IMO, but I don't know what to do about that. This first one is as I first saw them. I always take one of those to prove they were there in case they fly away. Let me know if this is better, please, ginger

    Below is "Ruffled Feathers". The wind can really blow on the beach and the marsh. I hope it doesn't keep this up. One spring it blew the whole time and on into summer.

    I think these look sharper without as much post,?, and I was careful not to post any that were not as sharp as they got. The DOF was not great, so it was difficult to post two birds at once. It was on about F8. That was the 300 Prime with the 1.4 extender on it, about 420.

    g
    Much. much, much better Ginger. The exposure is very good, they aren't blown out and you got some good detail in the shots. #2 and #3 are excellent shots. thumb.gif
    Harry
    http://behret.smugmug.com/ NANPA member
    How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
  • GREAPERGREAPER Registered Users Posts: 3,113 Major grins
    edited March 7, 2005
    The second is my favorite Ginger, Nice shots.
  • jwearjwear Registered Users Posts: 8,013 Major grins
    edited March 7, 2005
    almost harry
    Ginger you nailed #2 looks great now I have to chase you and Harry rolleyes1.gif congrats Gin nice very nice thumb.gifclap.gif Jeff
    Jeff W

    “PHOTOGRAPHY IS THE ‘JAZZ’ FOR THE EYES…”

    http://jwear.smugmug.com/
  • Steve CaviglianoSteve Cavigliano Super Moderators Posts: 3,599 moderator
    edited March 7, 2005
    Ginger,

    I agree that these look much better exposure-wise clap.gif As Harry, points out, the last 2 are very nice thumb.gif

    White is funny to work with. You can use "Selective Color" to remove some of the yellow from the feathers (Sel Color Adj Layer>White>move the Yellow slider to the left a bit), but I find that I can screw things up worse if I don't watch out. Like making the feathers have a magenta hue....lol

    The white on these birds doesn't look bad at all.

    Good stuff and thanks for sharing,
    Steve
    SmugMug Support Hero
  • ian408ian408 Administrators Posts: 21,949 moderator
    edited March 7, 2005
    Hi Ginger!

    The last two are nice shots. I think the brush in the first is a little
    distracting.

    Ian
    Moderator Journeys/Sports/Big Picture :: Need some help with dgrin?
Sign In or Register to comment.