Marc MuenchRegistered UsersPosts: 1,420Major grins
edited November 9, 2007
Tom,
Looks like you had a great trip to this location, as I have enjoyed seeing all your posts. I did like the glowing rock in the previos post. I believe this image appears to be so very smooth and clean.
Great depth in this image and you couldn't have gotten a better reflection.
This may be picky but I'd like to have seen a bit more difference in the two skys, one a little darker than the other. They look so close now that they don't seem real for some reason. It doesn't take away from the image but I'm wondering if there was more difference between them if it would make it even better.
Just a thought.
PS - Looking at the sky again I am wondering if this is a straight shot of if the clouds were added later. There seems to be some slight differences in some of the detail that a reflection should not cause. ???
Comments
Looks like you had a great trip to this location, as I have enjoyed seeing all your posts. I did like the glowing rock in the previos post. I believe this image appears to be so very smooth and clean.
Muench Workshops
MW on Facebook
Beautiful Tom .... I love it .... Skippy
.
Skippy (Australia) - Moderator of "HOLY MACRO" and "OTHER COOL SHOTS"
ALBUM http://ozzieskip.smugmug.com/
:skippy Everyone has the right to be stupid, but some people just abuse the privilege :dgrin
This may be picky but I'd like to have seen a bit more difference in the two skys, one a little darker than the other. They look so close now that they don't seem real for some reason. It doesn't take away from the image but I'm wondering if there was more difference between them if it would make it even better.
Just a thought.
PS - Looking at the sky again I am wondering if this is a straight shot of if the clouds were added later. There seems to be some slight differences in some of the detail that a reflection should not cause. ???