Looking for some feedback
I am trying to pick which of these two is the better/more interesting shot. Can you tell me which one grabs your interest more (if any). Other comments welcome. I can't go and reshoot the shot, but perhaps some PS treatment could help the shots? Are they adjusted too bright? I hav been getting quite dark prints because my imac screen is too bright and saturated. So I have deliberately adjusted these a touch brighter than looks good on my screen. Thanks.
#1
#2
#1
#2
0
Comments
www.intruecolors.com
Nikon D700 x2/D300
Nikon 70-200 2.8/50 1.8/85 1.8/14.24 2.8
http://www.michaelhelbigphotography.com
http://www.thewildpig.blogspot.com
Other than her jacket and the rocks, it's not popping out at me.
dak.smugmug.com
More tension in #2, and I don't like the fact that in #1 there's just no face at all, but no mystery about what she might be looking at.
Natural selection is responsible for every living thing that exists.
D3s, D500, D5300, and way more glass than the wife knows about.
Thanks for the comment. Appreciated.
http://www.michaelhelbigphotography.com
http://www.thewildpig.blogspot.com
OK, a vote for 2! Thanks.
http://www.michaelhelbigphotography.com
http://www.thewildpig.blogspot.com
Thanks for the comment.
http://www.michaelhelbigphotography.com
http://www.thewildpig.blogspot.com
The second one is attention grabbing because you want to see what she is looking at, or looking for.
#1
#2
[/quote]
In #1 I might even consider cropping out the shadow in the lower right and turning it into a sort of panorama. But regardless I think it's a really nice portrait of a young lady.
Photos that don't suck / 365 / Film & Lomography
http://www.michaelhelbigphotography.com
http://www.thewildpig.blogspot.com