Bird curved, comments please
Does this still look as soft? I came in close on the eye and beak, they weren't soft, so I went to RGB curves. First I increased the contrast, plus increasing the dark end a bit. Then I went to the red and increased it. I went to the blue, figured out how to increase the yellow in the legs. I am going to have to remember to use curves, since I don't use contrast and bright. g (I will add the first version in a small below this)
I know this is no substitute for the right light, and it may be soft and I am not seeing it. But I do wonder if curves can make the soft shots acceptable:D , probably not. This one really is sharp in the beak and eyes in the first place.
I know this is no substitute for the right light, and it may be soft and I am not seeing it. But I do wonder if curves can make the soft shots acceptable:D , probably not. This one really is sharp in the beak and eyes in the first place.
After all is said and done, it is the sweet tea.
0
Comments
Well done Ginger!
Michiel de Brieder
http://www.digital-eye.nl
I think if it's out of focus nothing will help.. did you sharpen at all?
Lovely bird tho..:D
It also appears to me that the focus was on the leaves whether in the background or foreground (I would suspect the background, but could be wrong).
A trick to try when shooting a subject like this is to use center spot metering, place the center spot on the subject, press the shutter halfway down to lock the focus and exposure then frame your shot. You have to already be zoomed to have this work. If you change the zoom after locking the focus, the focus will change.
Photographs by Dixie
| Canon 1Ds | Canon 5D Mark II | Canon 5D | Canon 50D | Canon 10D | Canon EOS Elan 7 | Mamiya Pro S RB67 |
...and bunches of Canon lenses - I'm equipment rich and dollar poor!
And I will look to see how many more of that pose I have, maybe one less soft, but I do like that one, too.
I think it was the day before with the marsh weeds, I wanted the spot focus, gotta find that thing. I hate it when the lens goes in and out. Then I lock it, I could move after that, and it would get the leaves, too.
ginger, thanks for commenting.
gotta get ready to go.......
Photographs by Dixie
| Canon 1Ds | Canon 5D Mark II | Canon 5D | Canon 50D | Canon 10D | Canon EOS Elan 7 | Mamiya Pro S RB67 |
...and bunches of Canon lenses - I'm equipment rich and dollar poor!
I think Lynn hit the nail on the head. Somehow, it looks like the camera focused on the leaves to the right. They are tack sharp and your bird is soft :cry I don't know what focus point(s) you used, but on sitting duck/hawk/eagle shots, I usually use center point. Then I take multiple shots moving the focus point over the subject. IOW, where you'd like to focus is sometimes not the area of greatest contrast. So you can bet the camera will choose that area and leave you disappointed. So by taking multiple shots (if possible) you can either move the AF point over the subject (trying to get a sharp focus), or you can switch to MF and basically "do it yourself" :-)
Not to fret Ginger, I have a ton of "soft" or Semi-soft" shots of sitting birds too. It's one of the costs of doing business and/or using long lenses :
Steve
This may be a little soft but it's a nice shot!
Moderator of: Location, Location, Location , Mind Your Own Business & Other Cool Shots
It can make an amazing difference. Try playing with the values in Step #3. The directions recommend you use between .2 and .5 for the web. But I've gone as high as 1, then used the Opacity slider to adjust how much of the effect I wanted. I've also masked out areas where the heavy sharpening looked ugly.
Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam
http://www.mcneel.com/users/jb/foghorn/ill_shut_up.au