A little unscientific comparison of EFS lens at 17mm
Airedrifter
Registered Users Posts: 253 Major grins
FWIW, I took a series of photos from the same place and compared three EFS lens at 17mm.
EFS 17-55 2.8 IS
EFS 17-85 4 IS
EFS 10-22
Doing such a test is fraught with problems, the primary being forgetting another memory card.
As a result the 17-85 tests are missing f/4 shots.
While I have these three lens, I'm going to redo this and try again.
But here is the first look.
BTW, A-priority auto; so 800iso to get f/22 shots. No PS. Not much thought.
http://mikesawyer.smugmug.com/gallery/3831293/2#P-1-9
EFS 17-55 2.8 IS
EFS 17-85 4 IS
EFS 10-22
Doing such a test is fraught with problems, the primary being forgetting another memory card.
As a result the 17-85 tests are missing f/4 shots.
While I have these three lens, I'm going to redo this and try again.
But here is the first look.
BTW, A-priority auto; so 800iso to get f/22 shots. No PS. Not much thought.
http://mikesawyer.smugmug.com/gallery/3831293/2#P-1-9
0
Comments
Would it be possible to use a tripod for your next round?
Do you have any observations to share at this point?
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums