Bridal Glow

ShelleykShelleyk Registered Users Posts: 71 Big grins
edited November 15, 2007 in Weddings
IMG_0862copy.jpg

Comments

  • anwmn1anwmn1 Registered Users Posts: 3,469 Major grins
    edited November 15, 2007
    Nice idea but to me it is too much blur for this aspect ratio.

    The more colorful trees above her head are also distracting a bit.
    "The Journey of life is as much in oneself as the roads one travels"


    Aaron Newman

    Website:www.CapturingLightandEmotion.com
    Facebook: Capturing Light and Emotion
  • photogmommaphotogmomma Registered Users Posts: 1,644 Major grins
    edited November 15, 2007
    I bet if you did this in B&W without the blur it would be a really wonderful shot! Not big on teh blur, though... :)
  • dogwooddogwood Registered Users Posts: 2,572 Major grins
    edited November 15, 2007
    Yeah, the added blur seems to be trying to correct for something you should have nailed in camera. For one, the bride's face is centered in the frame. For two, the only thing I see of one bride's maid is her back, and unfortunately her back is a lot bigger in this frame than your focal point, which is the bride.

    I think if you had kept working this scene with your camera, you'd have come up with a fantastic shot that didn't need any post-production. Shooting a group of pretty women all made up and dressed in pretty dresses is a photographers dream (well, this photographer anyway)... next time, just keep shooting away and forget about the post-production. Eventually, you'll get a magical shot in camera that will not only be better, it won't require a blur!

    Portland, Oregon Photographer Pete Springer
    website blog instagram facebook g+

  • IcebearIcebear Registered Users Posts: 4,015 Major grins
    edited November 15, 2007
    Well composed shot, and I like the idea, but maybe you used the wrong kind of blur. I'm assuming you looked at your capture and said "DANG, why'd I stop that sucker down so small" or much more refined words to that effect. Were you hoping to create a narrow DOF effect in pp? If so, try a layer of gaussian blur and an eraser. I don't think that's what you did.

    I have to agree with Pete though. Some mighty pretty women there to be blurring!! Just sayin' from the guys' point of view
    John :
    Natural selection is responsible for every living thing that exists.
    D3s, D500, D5300, and way more glass than the wife knows about.
  • ShelleykShelleyk Registered Users Posts: 71 Big grins
    edited November 15, 2007
    Thanks for the suggestions...the blur is actually Daves Ethereal Glow photoshop action, the whole point was to keep the other girls in blur and focus on the bride
  • ShepsMomShepsMom Registered Users Posts: 4,319 Major grins
    edited November 15, 2007
    Personally, i think your original shot would be better without any blur. This one doesn't work on the shot, there is something that's not coming together. Have you tried motion blur instead?
    Marina
    www.intruecolors.com
    Nikon D700 x2/D300
    Nikon 70-200 2.8/50 1.8/85 1.8/14.24 2.8
  • tjl1388tjl1388 Registered Users Posts: 94 Big grins
    edited November 15, 2007
    I like the idea as well and I think it would work in a different situation.

    I think she seperates herself from the rest of the girls by simply being the only one looking at the camera.
  • IcebearIcebear Registered Users Posts: 4,015 Major grins
    edited November 15, 2007
    What he said
    15524779-Ti.gif
    John :
    Natural selection is responsible for every living thing that exists.
    D3s, D500, D5300, and way more glass than the wife knows about.
Sign In or Register to comment.