Cokin or cokin knock off?

paddlerxpaddlerx Registered Users Posts: 31 Big grins
edited November 20, 2007 in Accessories
is this just knock off crap or is it worth getting?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ND4-Neutral-Density-Plexiglas-Filter-for-Cokin-P-ND4_W0QQitemZ150182537297QQihZ005QQcategoryZ30041QQcmdZViewItem

and similarly for the holders etc?

seems too good to be true. so it likely is huh?

thanks.
40d/sigma 10-20/24-70 2.8L /Canon 70-200f4/50 f1.8/Canon 430EX/ebay triggers and so on.

Comments

  • gryphonslair99gryphonslair99 Registered Users Posts: 182 Major grins
    edited November 19, 2007
    I think by asking the question you pretty much answered it as well. Plexiglass. There is some real photo quality stuff. NOT!

    Seriously. Good filters cost money. I'm always amazed to see someone spend $1600 on a 70-200 f2.8L IS and put a $7.00 UV filter on it for protection that they bought at some discount store and then they can't figure out why their images are soft. Like buying a Lamborgini and putting on Wal-marts cheapest tires on it.

    In the digital age, the need for filters is pretty much down to circular polarizers and ND filters. Spend some decent money on the filters you need, plan ahead in buying the size you need and take good care of them. They will last a lifetime.
  • ian408ian408 Administrators Posts: 21,949 moderator
    edited November 19, 2007
    The optical quality of glass or plastic is important to the final product, the
    photo.

    You'd be better off not purchasing the knock-off if you can avoid it.
    Moderator Journeys/Sports/Big Picture :: Need some help with dgrin?
  • claudermilkclaudermilk Registered Users Posts: 2,756 Major grins
    edited November 20, 2007
    I wouldn't touch it. The descriptions can't make up their mind if it's plexi or glass. Which says they don't know, don't care, or are dishonest, or a combination of the above.
Sign In or Register to comment.