A female cardinal.......

Bud1880Bud1880 Registered Users Posts: 500 Major grins
edited December 10, 2007 in Wildlife
......is really a pretty bird. Sunlight cooperating and a little PP.

230295536-L.jpg

Bud

Comments

  • MaestroMaestro Registered Users Posts: 5,395 Major grins
    edited December 9, 2007
    Those are pretty colors. Did you apply some noise reduction? The photo has an air brushed look to it.
  • Bud1880Bud1880 Registered Users Posts: 500 Major grins
    edited December 9, 2007
    Maestro wrote:
    Those are pretty colors. Did you apply some noise reduction? The photo has an air brushed look to it.
    Stephen,

    I used the "Orton" effect that I first saw TomK use on a portrait of one of his cats. I really like the effect on some shots. This particular one was not as sharp as I'd like but I thought the colors were cool. The effect makes the colors 'pop' and makes up for a lack of detail from using a non-DSLR. Well, that and shooting through a window. :D

    Here's the original.

    229338034-L.jpg

    Bud
  • MaestroMaestro Registered Users Posts: 5,395 Major grins
    edited December 9, 2007
    Call me crazy Bud, but I like the original better. :D
  • kdogkdog Administrators Posts: 11,681 moderator
    edited December 9, 2007
    Maestro wrote:
    Call me crazy Bud, but I like the original better. :D

    Me 2. :D
  • africaddictafricaddict Registered Users Posts: 111 Major grins
    edited December 9, 2007
    Me threemwink.gif
    WEBSITE
    "My goal in life is to be as good of a person as my dog already thinks I am"
    D5|D500
    |D810|14-24|24-70|70-200f/2.8|70-200f/4|400 f/2.8E|500 f/4VR|Sigma150f/2.8|Sigma 24f/1.4ART


  • ShepsMomShepsMom Registered Users Posts: 4,319 Major grins
    edited December 9, 2007
    Yep, me 4, it's a birdie "glamour" shot!! Now, how do you distinguish male from female?
    Marina
    www.intruecolors.com
    Nikon D700 x2/D300
    Nikon 70-200 2.8/50 1.8/85 1.8/14.24 2.8
  • Bud1880Bud1880 Registered Users Posts: 500 Major grins
    edited December 9, 2007
    Wow! I'm outnumbered. Guess I have to reconsider my propensity for 'softer' pictures. That and reconsider just exactly who the 'crazy' one is. :D

    Thanks all for your input, it really is appreciated.

    Marina,

    The male is solid red with a black mask on his face. Usually the female doesn't look quite as colorful as in this shot. That's why I thought it was kind of unusual.
  • ShepsMomShepsMom Registered Users Posts: 4,319 Major grins
    edited December 9, 2007
    Thanks Bud for the explanation. :D
    Marina
    www.intruecolors.com
    Nikon D700 x2/D300
    Nikon 70-200 2.8/50 1.8/85 1.8/14.24 2.8
  • riddim_makerriddim_maker Registered Users Posts: 1,835 Major grins
    edited December 10, 2007
    Love the colors in the first, but the original looks better to me also.
    Maybe the "Orton" effect works better for flowers and dreamy landscapes.
    I think I might try it on some of my images, see how it works.
    Good job nonetheless Budthumb.gif
    Russ
  • dbaker1221dbaker1221 Registered Users Posts: 4,482 Major grins
    edited December 10, 2007
    i think it would be a good effect if you were going to make this into a card.
    that way your eyes would be drawn to the words more than the photo.
    **If I keep shooting, I'm bound to hit something**
    Dave
  • Bud1880Bud1880 Registered Users Posts: 500 Major grins
    edited December 10, 2007
    Russ, Dave,

    Thanks for your comments. It's unanimous. I don't know what I'm doing. :D
  • HarrybHarryb Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 22,708 Major grins
    edited December 10, 2007
    I like them both Bud. The original will get a better reception in a forum of wildlife shooters (we try to capture the subject as is). The shot with the Orton effect would get a better reception from a different audience.
    Harry
    http://behret.smugmug.com/ NANPA member
    How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
  • Bud1880Bud1880 Registered Users Posts: 500 Major grins
    edited December 10, 2007
    Harryb wrote:
    I like them both Bud. The original will get a better reception in a forum of wildlife shooters (we try to capture the subject as is). The shot with the Orton effect would get a better reception from a different audience.
    Thanks Harry. I can understand that.

    I thought the colors were unusual for a female cardinal. I've always thought them pretty bland but with the sunlight that day she was a very beautiful bird. I took Dave's suggestion though and turned it into a decent Christmas card. :D

    230944112-L.jpg

    I'll take this opportunity to wish you all a Merry Christmas. Thanks for the help.

    Bud
  • GiphsubGiphsub Registered Users Posts: 2,662 Major grins
    edited December 10, 2007
    Thanks Bud. Merry Christmas to you too. I like them both BTW thumb.gif
  • raptorcaptorraptorcaptor Registered Users Posts: 3,968 Major grins
    edited December 10, 2007
    Maestro wrote:
    Call me crazy Bud, but I like the original better. :D

    I'm with Stephen on this one!
    Glenn

    My website | NANPA Member
  • Bud1880Bud1880 Registered Users Posts: 500 Major grins
    edited December 10, 2007
    Thank you Mike and Glenn. At least most of you liked the original. Guess I'll have to be careful about posting 'phony' bird shots in the future. :D
Sign In or Register to comment.