Options
Aperture on mac pro vs macbook pro
twinturbov6
Registered Users Posts: 5 Beginner grinner
It takes about 1 to 1.5 seconds for raw files to be rendered with Aperture on my macbook pro 2.2ghz/4gb using everything optimized for speed some of which is here:
http://www.bagelturf.com/files/b84395d029b17f2eb6249056cf2ede1e-1061.html
I was wondering if a mac pro 2.66/x1900xt/8gb does this in about half the time. Ideally I want instant loading times of raws as if they were jpegs while flying through and rating and choosing pics with dual monitors, one of which is a 30" comparing multiple files at 100%.
I can't find any direct comparisons online, just a bunch of people saying that the mac pro should theoretically be better. If you've used both of these systems with aperture please let me know.
http://www.bagelturf.com/files/b84395d029b17f2eb6249056cf2ede1e-1061.html
I was wondering if a mac pro 2.66/x1900xt/8gb does this in about half the time. Ideally I want instant loading times of raws as if they were jpegs while flying through and rating and choosing pics with dual monitors, one of which is a 30" comparing multiple files at 100%.
I can't find any direct comparisons online, just a bunch of people saying that the mac pro should theoretically be better. If you've used both of these systems with aperture please let me know.
0
Comments
Leopard is also faster than Tiger with Aperture, so that's something to keep in mind. If you get a Mac Pro today it will come with Leopard pre-installed.