national cathedral in ir

Cantfeelmyfingers · December 11, 2007

that's pretty darn sweet!!

Ann McRae · December 11, 2007

Outstanding!

ann

Tommyboy · December 11, 2007

Wow--what a striking photo.

Wonder what it would cost to modify my XT to infrared. . . .

jkcashin · December 12, 2007

I don't normally like IR, but this one's an exception. Maybe it's because people seem to gravitate to foilage when they shoot IR, but this one is stunning.

Jamie

ian408 · December 12, 2007

Tommyboy wrote:

Wow--what a striking photo.

Wonder what it would cost to modify my XT to infrared. . . .

Do it. www.maxmax.com.

This shot is great. i love the way the foreground and background work
together. Not to mention it's IR

Arvan · December 12, 2007

Cantfeelmyfingers wrote:

that's pretty darn sweet!!

couldn´t say it better myself

schmoo · December 12, 2007

I love this fresh new view of this place!!

One thing I love about the National Cathedral is that it looks like it could be sitting on some rolling hillside in England -- except that it's surrounded by DC. I think taking this to IR really brings out the nature: the clouds, the trees, the shadows in the stone. It really takes this scene back a few centuries and across the ocean.

Fabulous work

pthorpe · December 12, 2007

I like the way the two towers stab at the two dark spots in the sky.
Spledid work!

-pt-

aktse · December 12, 2007

Spledid.

What did you do in post?

And I want to see more!

spechtal · December 12, 2007

Very lovely.

JonMikal · December 12, 2007

aktse wrote:

What did you do in post?

i haven't yet found a need to convert my camera for ir. i just utilize the r72 (ir) filter on my d70s. in ps, i convert to b&w and adjust levels for a little contrast.

thank you all for your wonderful comments. really means a lot