critique please

SeamusSeamus Registered Users Posts: 1,573 Major grins
edited March 13, 2005 in Wildlife
I am ruthless when going through my shots, anything that is oof or too distant for detail gets deleted but I wonder if I would get away with this one:

17329297-L.jpg

Shay.

Comments

  • HarrybHarryb Registered Users, Retired Mod Posts: 22,708 Major grins
    edited March 12, 2005
    shay wrote:
    I am ruthless when going through my shots, anything that is oof or too distant for detail gets deleted but I wonder if I would get away with this one:

    Shay.
    Hey Shay,

    That's a keeper. The sky and the clouds are good and the ducks flying in from the right side work well. It would have been nicer to get in closer to them but sometimes they don't cooperate. Have you tried a closer crop?
    Harry
    http://behret.smugmug.com/ NANPA member
    How many photographers does it take to change a light bulb? 50. One to change the bulb, and forty-nine to say, "I could have done that better!"
  • bkrietebkriete Registered Users Posts: 168 Major grins
    edited March 12, 2005
    What he said.
  • AndyAndy Registered Users Posts: 50,016 Major grins
    edited March 12, 2005
    a little rotation, a little cloning
    this was a fun shot to play with. as is, out of the camera, it's not so interesting to me. so i increased the canvas size, rotated (i was going for a jaunty angle, accented by the cloud line.... and i had to clone in a bit more clouds..., cloned some sky and clouds (really easy to clone sky and clouds, so this is good practice if you're not used to major cloning...) and then cropped at 3:2 aspect ratio.

    tip on cloning: i always clone in a separate layer, that way it's easy to use a layer mask to undo parts of the cloning if need be.

    i feel like this shot now, i'm above these birds, watching them fly.. i better fly faster, to catch up!

    (my edit of image by shay)
    17363378-L.jpg

    (shay's original)
    17329297-L.jpg
  • tmlphototmlphoto Registered Users Posts: 1,444 Major grins
    edited March 12, 2005
    I think its a keeper as well. Its interesting in an almost abstract way.
    Thomas :D

    TML Photography
    tmlphoto.com
  • SeamusSeamus Registered Users Posts: 1,573 Major grins
    edited March 13, 2005
    Harryb wrote:
    Hey Shay,

    That's a keeper. The sky and the clouds are good and the ducks flying in from the right side work well. It would have been nicer to get in closer to them but sometimes they don't cooperate. Have you tried a closer crop?
    thanks Harry, I don't have room to crop anymore, it's nearly a 100% crop.

    Shay.
  • SeamusSeamus Registered Users Posts: 1,573 Major grins
    edited March 13, 2005
    bkriete wrote:
    What he said.
    Thanks bk,

    Shay.
  • SeamusSeamus Registered Users Posts: 1,573 Major grins
    edited March 13, 2005
    andy wrote:
    this was a fun shot to play with. as is, out of the camera, it's not so interesting to me. so i increased the canvas size, rotated (i was going for a jaunty angle, accented by the cloud line.... and i had to clone in a bit more clouds..., cloned some sky and clouds (really easy to clone sky and clouds, so this is good practice if you're not used to major cloning...) and then cropped at 3:2 aspect ratio.

    tip on cloning: i always clone in a separate layer, that way it's easy to use a layer mask to undo parts of the cloning if need be.

    i feel like this shot now, i'm above these birds, watching them fly.. i better fly faster, to catch up!

    (my edit of image by shay)
    17363378-L.jpg

    (shay's original)
    17329297-L.jpg
    Thanks Andy, I like your take, I have to go back to reading Kelby's book nowrolleyes1.gif

    Shay.
  • SeamusSeamus Registered Users Posts: 1,573 Major grins
    edited March 13, 2005
    tmlphoto wrote:
    I think its a keeper as well. Its interesting in an almost abstract way.
    Thanks Thomas, I liked it but I wasn't sure if the birds were detailed enough. I will print it. The colours should look good.

    Shay.
Sign In or Register to comment.