What do you think? Christmas photo

magicpicmagicpic Registered Users Posts: 527 Major grins
edited December 29, 2007 in People
235174439-M.jpg
235169337-M.jpg
235171748-M.jpg

Please comment on the photos..thanks janis
(2) Canon 20d, (1) canon 30d, 70-200is 2.8, tamron 17-50,canon 50mm 1.4
http://www.photographybywidget.com

Comments

  • TommyboyTommyboy Registered Users Posts: 590 Major grins
    edited December 26, 2007
    These are lovely photos. I prefer number one--great expressions, saturation, etc. Just spot on.

    Number 2 is also very nice, though the contrast could use a boost for my taste.

    Don't care for number 3, mostly because of Dad's grooming. . . . Which has nothing to do with your photography. Perhaps a shave and a ponytail?
    "Press the shutter when you are sure of success." —Kim Jong-il

    NEW Smugmug Site
  • magicpicmagicpic Registered Users Posts: 527 Major grins
    edited December 29, 2007
    Tommyboy wrote:
    These are lovely photos. I prefer number one--great expressions, saturation, etc. Just spot on.

    Number 2 is also very nice, though the contrast could use a boost for my taste.

    Don't care for number 3, mostly because of Dad's grooming. . . . Which has nothing to do with your photography. Perhaps a shave and a ponytail?

    Please comment on the photos thanks janis
    (2) Canon 20d, (1) canon 30d, 70-200is 2.8, tamron 17-50,canon 50mm 1.4
    http://www.photographybywidget.com
  • JenGraceJenGrace Registered Users Posts: 1,229 Major grins
    edited December 29, 2007
    Nice looking family! I think the crop is a little tight on the first and third. Otherwise, these have nice color and diffuse light. thumb.gif
    Jen

    Gallery of mine...caution, it's under CONSTANT construction! | Photo Journal

    In the right light, at the right time, everything is extraordinary. ~Aaron Rose
  • ShepsMomShepsMom Registered Users Posts: 4,319 Major grins
    edited December 29, 2007
    I love the first shot clap.gif
    Agree that 2nd can use just a bit of contrast.
    Third, not so much, i can't point what exactly it is, i think it has something to do with 3 people on the picture have completely different lighting. It looks like they don't belong on the same shot.
    Lady's face looks very dark and plasticky compare to the baby and a man in the same shot.

    Overall, nice portraits. thumb.gif
    Marina
    www.intruecolors.com
    Nikon D700 x2/D300
    Nikon 70-200 2.8/50 1.8/85 1.8/14.24 2.8
  • xxclixxxxxclixxx Registered Users Posts: 91 Big grins
    edited December 29, 2007
    Good Stuff

    3rd the background is half dark half light, so it makes it feel a bit cornered. Looks like baby might have moved a bit as there is a little fuzz (so maybe faster shutter next time). Thanks for sharing!
    Tim Linden
    http://www.riphoto.com/
    Please Vote - External Shopping Cart Links:
    http://uservoice.com/a/mL8RD
  • bauermanbauerman Registered Users Posts: 452 Major grins
    edited December 29, 2007
    Judging it based solely on the expression of the child - number one is the winner. The baby has kind of a detached expression in the other two. There is also a bit too much of the "misty lighting" effect on the male subject in number three.

    I might also suggest some shots taken in the landscape orientation with the subjects maybe a bit more off center in the frame.
    Perhaps the greatest social service that can be rendered by anybody to this country and to mankind is to bring up a family. - George Bernard Shaw
Sign In or Register to comment.