center of attention2-

SystemSystem Registered Users Posts: 8,186 moderator
edited January 2, 2008 in People
238293005-L-2.jpg

ok, ladies, let's try it again-

of course, my wife had to suffer an amputation of her left arm-

Comments

  • ShepsMomShepsMom Registered Users Posts: 4,319 Major grins
    edited January 1, 2008
    George, your first Center of Attention, in my eyes, was better. The kid was trully a center of attention!
    This one isn't as much, there is too much going on on the picture. In my case, the center of attention is girl's finger pointing you know where.... rolleyes1.gif
    Marina
    www.intruecolors.com
    Nikon D700 x2/D300
    Nikon 70-200 2.8/50 1.8/85 1.8/14.24 2.8
  • saurorasaurora Registered Users Posts: 4,320 Major grins
    edited January 1, 2008
    Good catch Marina. rolleyes1.gif I have to agree that the title gets lost with this one. Actually, Nate almost gets lost in this one with so much going on and the stronger PP makes him less the center of attention. But still, an interesting photo to look at! Of the 2, I definitely like the first one best.
  • SystemSystem Registered Users Posts: 8,186 moderator
    edited January 1, 2008
    revised pic for marina and susan-
  • ShepsMomShepsMom Registered Users Posts: 4,319 Major grins
    edited January 1, 2008
    Where, where?? headscratch.gif

    Edit: Nevermind, i see it now Laughing.gif, You're funny!! I was looking for a missing something, i found it !! :o)
    Marina
    www.intruecolors.com
    Nikon D700 x2/D300
    Nikon 70-200 2.8/50 1.8/85 1.8/14.24 2.8
  • ArvanArvan Registered Users Posts: 888 Major grins
    edited January 1, 2008
    Sorry m8..You have taken some very nice pictures indeed..But im getting tired of this fake HDR look you allways apply to your photos. I tried that myself..After 1,5 minute i had the same result as you got there.

    Im not saying that its not cool looking because it is!. But on every photo?.

    Like your work..But it´s getting..Iunno..lack of fantasy?.

    // Arvid
  • SystemSystem Registered Users Posts: 8,186 moderator
    edited January 1, 2008
    Arvan wrote:
    Sorry m8..You have taken some very nice pictures indeed..But im getting tired of this fake HDR look you allways apply to your photos. I tried that myself..After 1,5 minute i had the same result as you got there.

    Im not saying that its not cool looking because it is!. But on every photo?.

    Like your work..But it´s getting..Iunno..lack of fantasy?.

    // Arvid


    -
  • SystemSystem Registered Users Posts: 8,186 moderator
    edited January 1, 2008
    Arvan wrote:
    Sorry m8..You have taken some very nice pictures indeed..But im getting tired of this fake HDR look you allways apply to your photos. I tried that myself..After 1,5 minute i had the same result as you got there.

    Im not saying that its not cool looking because it is!. But on every photo?.

    Like your work..But it´s getting..Iunno..lack of fantasy?.

    // Arvid

    although I've had several photos in the last couple months that are not in this vein of processing:

    http://dgrin.com/showthread.php?t=80136

    http://dgrin.com/showthread.php?t=79529

    http://dgrin.com/showthread.php?t=79463

    http://dgrin.com/showthread.php?t=78893

    http://dgrin.com/showthread.php?t=78849

    http://dgrin.com/showthread.php?t=78641

    http://dgrin.com/showthread.php?t=78255

    http://dgrin.com/showthread.php?t=77846

    http://dgrin.com/showthread.php?t=74932

    http://dgrin.com/showthread.php?t=74224

    http://dgrin.com/showthread.php?t=74343

    http://dgrin.com/showthread.php?t=73819

    http://dgrin.com/showthread.php?t=73813

    http://dgrin.com/showthread.php?t=71337


    why don't you just assume that if you see my name, it's going to be a photo processed in a faux hdr manner-

    and then you could just very easily not click on my photo and therefore not get tired of seeing the same ole' thing--

    in fact, if you put me on your ignore list, that might keep my name from coming into your view altogether-




    best
    george


    ps I believe this has been settled in an amicable fashion without harm to any of the animals involved in this production-
  • pyrtekpyrtek Registered Users Posts: 539 Major grins
    edited January 2, 2008
    Arvan wrote:
    But im getting tired of this fake HDR look you allways apply to your photos. I tried that myself..After 1,5 minute i had the same result as you got there.

    Wow, you're so awesome.
  • SystemSystem Registered Users Posts: 8,186 moderator
    edited January 2, 2008
    pyrtek wrote:
    Wow, you're so awesome.


    bernard, you crack my (l)!!!-

    thanks!-
  • kp-pixkp-pix Registered Users Posts: 191 Major grins
    edited January 2, 2008
    That sounds a bit painful! :D Glad someone commented in here with humour because I was going to be a cow!

    Have to agree on the non-click thing and the opinion thing just blows my mind. How rude! and it is seriously this sort of commentary which stops me sharing images in forums to be honest. Sure was lacking a learning curve!
  • ArvanArvan Registered Users Posts: 888 Major grins
    edited January 2, 2008
    I must say that i wasn´t rude in any point. If he/you/it knows that it´s good work...Why even soak it in?.

    I like the pictures very much, just not the processing. Note VERY! wich i even wrote earlier. Don´t think im a rude bastard, cause im not. I like your work as i said!

    If you took the critique bad then it´s on me and i apologize.



    // Arvid
  • pyrtekpyrtek Registered Users Posts: 539 Major grins
    edited January 2, 2008
    kp-pix wrote:
    That sounds a bit painful! :D

    George loves the pain. He embraces it. He is One with the pain.
  • SystemSystem Registered Users Posts: 8,186 moderator
    edited January 2, 2008
    pyrtek wrote:
    George loves the pain. He embraces it. He is One with the pain.


    yes-

    as long as it doesn't hurt-
  • SystemSystem Registered Users Posts: 8,186 moderator
    edited January 2, 2008
    Arvan wrote:
    I must say that i wasn´t rude in any point. If he/you/it knows that it´s good work...Why even soak it in?.

    I like the pictures very much, just not the processing. Note VERY! wich i even wrote earlier. Don´t think im a rude bastard, cause im not. I like your work as i said!

    If you took the critique bad then it´s on me and i apologize.



    // Arvid

    being the obsessive-compulsive anal retentive neurotic fat etc that I am, I can be overly sensitive-

    I much appreciate your response-

    I am also tending to forgetfulness-

    what were we talking about?-
  • SystemSystem Registered Users Posts: 8,186 moderator
    edited January 2, 2008
    kp-pix wrote:
    That sounds a bit painful! :D Glad someone commented in here with humour because I was going to be a cow!

    Have to agree on the non-click thing and the opinion thing just blows my mind. How rude! and it is seriously this sort of commentary which stops me sharing images in forums to be honest. Sure was lacking a learning curve!


    thanks karen-

    I believe all is right with the world-

    at least in this little community-
  • jkcashinjkcashin Registered Users Posts: 68 Big grins
    edited January 2, 2008
    On the bright side, this little playground scuffle did draw my eye to Georges work... thanks all!

    Jamie
Sign In or Register to comment.