b/c the original is soft (slightly OOf), IMHO, the only one that really works is #2. In the 1st and last, the fact that the image is soft and grainy really detracts. In #2, it almost looks like it was done on purpose.
Thanks for the critique Colleen. Yes the original was OOF, I just think it's fun to take a picture that misses the mark and tweak it some and see what happens.
Comments
b/c the original is soft (slightly OOf), IMHO, the only one that really works is #2. In the 1st and last, the fact that the image is soft and grainy really detracts. In #2, it almost looks like it was done on purpose.
just my $0.02.
C.
***********************************
check out my (sports) pics: ColleenBonney.smugmug.com
*Thanks to Boolsacho for the avatar photo (from the dgrin portrait project)