Great Falls National Park
eoren1
Registered Users Posts: 2,391 Major grins
Taken from the Virginia side. Processed Raw files with Photomatix.
Eyal
My site | Non-MHD Landscapes |Google+ | Twitter | Facebook | Smugmug photos
My site | Non-MHD Landscapes |Google+ | Twitter | Facebook | Smugmug photos
0
Comments
Lighting in the 3rd is superb- can you adjust the 1st and 2nd to match?
Aaron Newman
Website:www.CapturingLightandEmotion.com
Facebook: Capturing Light and Emotion
I like the first best for its composition (just lovely) and would love to see more contrast overall, and perhaps a little oomph in the ground exposure without blowing out the water on the far right too badly.
Very nice. Thanks for sharing!
Thanks for the comments.
1 and 2 were posted in Photomatix. 3 in Lightroom.
I redid 1 and 2 in LR and got this:
My site | Non-MHD Landscapes |Google+ | Twitter | Facebook | Smugmug photos
http://www.jonathanswinton.com
http://www.swintoncounseling.com
I absolutely love the kayakers giving perspective to the scene. I've seen some photos of this area but didn't know the falls were that big. Yikes! I have to pop down and visit this place sometime myself.
Photos that don't suck / 365 / Film & Lomography
Second one is right on though. Unlike Schmoo I would crop the bottom up to the middle of the rocks (there bye cropping out the kayakers).
With the kayakers - the main water fall is almost dead center and the kayakers as well as the water going off the frame in that direction really draw you away from the sweet spot. I think by cropping them out you are left with a shot that the main water fall is below center and provides a fluid movement of the eyes. Just flows better- no pun intended
The kayakers are cool but I think it is even better without them. Then again you can have both!
Aaron Newman
Website:www.CapturingLightandEmotion.com
Facebook: Capturing Light and Emotion
Sam
for you" and there/ their is no grammar check yet so please forgive me Jesus did.
My Web site:
http://Glory2Jesus4Photography.smugmug.com/
My blog: http://glory2jesus4photography.blogspot.com/
I think the difference in the water color comes from using a polarizer to both slow the shutter speed and try to tone down reflections. It actually worked better when I had it emphasizing the reflections as in the portrait oriented shot.
I'll spend some more time with LR to see if I can get the colors better. Haven't played with the individual color hue/saturations on these shots...yet. I'm glad you pushed me to go back and see what I could do in LR with these shots. After playing with some of those sliders (and toning down the brightness), I was amazed with how different the picture looked from the Photomatix attempts.
As far as the kayakers, I'm planning on keeping them in for the sense of scale. Given the shutter speeds of 1.3-2 seconds, you won't believe how many frames I have where those two are blurred.
More to come!
E
My site | Non-MHD Landscapes |Google+ | Twitter | Facebook | Smugmug photos
Canon 5D Mk.2/Grip || Canon 7D Backup
17-40 f/4L || 70-200 f/2.8L IS || 100mm f/2.8L Macro || 24-70mm f/2.8L
Wedding Photographer
www.cwphotos.net
Next time you could do two shots to handle things like the kayakers. Take one multi-second shot to get the water right then do a fast shot (fast enough for the moving subject). Drop the second shot on the first and then add a layer mask 'hide all' to the shot you dropped on top, then just delete the layer mask over the kayakers so they are the only thing that shows through from the second fast shot.
-Philip
-Willy Wonka
Nice shots, and I like the LR edits better
http://www.michaelhelbigphotography.com
http://www.thewildpig.blogspot.com
My Gallery
and i too like the LR versions
E
My site | Non-MHD Landscapes |Google+ | Twitter | Facebook | Smugmug photos