Sigma 200-500/2.8 ...

Manfr3dManfr3d Registered Users Posts: 2,008 Major grins
edited February 4, 2008 in Cameras
... "would you like a camera with that lens"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K77UvaiHii0
“To consult the rules of composition before making a picture is a little like consulting the law of gravitation before going for a walk.”
― Edward Weston

Comments

  • AugieAugie Registered Users Posts: 56 Big grins
    edited February 2, 2008
    headscratch.gif

    Kinda defeats the idea of being portable.
  • Van IsleVan Isle Registered Users Posts: 384 Major grins
    edited February 2, 2008
    .4m-1m focal length with a tc? At f/5.6? That's just silly!

    VI
    dgrin.com - making my best shots even better since 2006.
  • HauerHauer Registered Users Posts: 550 Major grins
    edited February 2, 2008
    Wow... this thing doesen't need a tripod but a stretcher!
    With a weight of 16kg, I think this monster lens falls in the Schwarzenegger catagory... good for some simultaneos weightlifting! Laughing.gif

    Cheers - Herman
    My motto: To learn more today, than I knew yesterday!

    Nikon gear & some lenses.
  • jwwjww Registered Users Posts: 449 Major grins
    edited February 2, 2008
    Manfr3d wrote:
    ... "would you like a camera with that lens"

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K77UvaiHii0

    ..yikes... only if it came with a Sherpa or mounted to a golf cart! mwink.gif
  • rpcrowerpcrowe Registered Users Posts: 733 Major grins
    edited February 2, 2008
    I am waiting for...
    The primary accessory for this lens, a set of heavy duty wheels.
  • SavedByZeroSavedByZero Registered Users Posts: 226 Major grins
    edited February 3, 2008
    I'm quite sure all the tabloid supermarket rags will have 4 or 5 on order for their top paparazzi stringers to use on assignments. Because some where in the South of France or off the coast of Spain there is a sexy young celebrity sun bathing topless or nude on a yacht deck that needs to have their picture taken from the rocky cliffs miles away for the next "Guess Which Star's Cellulite Covered Bottom This Is??" cover story.

    rolleyes1.gif
  • dadwtwinsdadwtwins Registered Users Posts: 804 Major grins
    edited February 4, 2008
    This lens is crazy. I couldn't even imagine trying to capture a moving object with this massive lens.rolleyes1.gif
    My Homepage :thumb-->http://dthorp.smugmug.com
    My Photo Blog -->http://dthorpphoto.blogspot.com/
  • gusgus Registered Users Posts: 16,209 Major grins
    edited February 4, 2008
    I'm quite sure all the tabloid supermarket rags will have 4 or 5 on order for their top paparazzi stringers to use on assignments. Because some where in the South of France or off the coast of Spain there is a sexy young celebrity sun bathing topless or nude on a yacht deck that needs to have their picture taken from the rocky cliffs miles away for the next "Guess Which Star's Cellulite Covered Bottom This Is??" cover story.

    rolleyes1.gif
    Not really. A $1000 bigma on a $1000 crop camera body has 800mm (1600mm with a 2x) reach & when it comes to spying logistics (hiding in bushes...running after people in the street or photoraphing from the pillion seat of a motorbike...you dont need something of that physical size.

    I am having difficulty imagining a use for it actually.
Sign In or Register to comment.