Sony 135 F2.8 STF lens bokeh and A700
I finally bought the Sony 135 2.8 STF lens and tried it out for the first time today on my A700. I'm very impressed with it and found it a joy to use. The bokeh is everything they said it would be and the manual focus is not a problem on the A700 view finder. If you don't know about it you can read here.
When I was taking pictures today I didn't use a tripod which would of definitely helped since it was a very cloudy day. However, I still managed to get some hand held pictures of moving Koalas and little birds. I can't wait for spring, cherry blossoms and bring my tripod to officially try it out.
Heres a sample of the bokeh (it really is the best) on an untouched photo:
When I was taking pictures today I didn't use a tripod which would of definitely helped since it was a very cloudy day. However, I still managed to get some hand held pictures of moving Koalas and little birds. I can't wait for spring, cherry blossoms and bring my tripod to officially try it out.
Heres a sample of the bokeh (it really is the best) on an untouched photo:
0
Comments
Natural selection is responsible for every living thing that exists.
D3s, D500, D5300, and way more glass than the wife knows about.
These are some nice photos. This is the first I've heard of the 135 very interesting. I started using the Minolta along time ago. And now have the A100. I would be interested in your opinion of what the advantages the A700 as over the A100.
Thanks
John
www.smileysphotography.com
WWW.smileys-photography.smugmug.com
Lots and lots of other new features which was nice, like multiple save settings.
The new wireless remote is good too but lacking so I still use a wired remote.
I love that you can use your computer to take pictures and download directly. I can see many uses for this.
I would seriously consider upgrading if I were you. If you have the money you might wait for the full frame Sony that I heard is coming out. I don't know when it's coming out or how much it will be (probably expensive). I bought the A700 and use my A100 as a backup so it worked out well.
Steve
Tour Leader - DPRK
Uri Tours
SmugMug - photos.japanphotos.jp
HERE
Tour Leader - DPRK
Uri Tours
SmugMug - photos.japanphotos.jp
Thanks for the info. I give more credence to someone that is using one over the online review.
As for the Oxbow bend photos on my site. I was shooting film, Kodak's E200 and FujiFilm Velvia & Provia 100 using a maxxum 7 and 9
John
WWW.smileys-photography.smugmug.com
Great work
Ed
http://ergphoto.smugmug.com
Cheers
Harj
Hi, all,
I'm new on the site and just wanted to introduce myself to other Alpha users.
I've got a closet full of Maxxum film bodies and lenses. But I recently got my first DSLR, the Alpha 700. What a camera!
One of these days -- or years -- I'll get the STF. That is a dream lens come true.
Harry
"Too many lenses, not enough time."
Harry,
Welcome to the Digital Grin.
Congratulations on the new camera. By all reports it is awesome, but I'd like to hear more about what you like about it.
Also, if you'd tell us about the "STF" lens ...
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
Great to be here!
My reasons for liking the A700:
1. Excellent ergonomics. Even though it doesn't have two knobs like the Konica Minolta 7D, it's still very easy to use. Most settings can be made by pushing a button on the body, and then making selection with a control dial. Alternatively, you can use the camera's Quick Navigation System -- an innovative four-way toggle button that allows you to select choices from a display on the back LCD. All the main choices are right there and it's easy to move vertically and horizontally between them using the toggle button. I was initially dubious about this, but I've found it works very well. I hardly ever have to access the menus to make basic settings on the camera.
2. The LCD screen is very high resolution, with 920,000 pixels. Very bright,large, clean type, and super easy to read in bright light.
3. The body is robust. The front and top are magnesium. The bottom and parts of the back are engineering grade plastic. It all feels very solid, yet light to carry around all day.
4. The camera offers Sony's so-called Super Steady Shot stabilization, which is sensor-based, not lens-based. I'm finding it buys an extra three stops or so, sometimes more.
5. I went for the optional vertical grip. This is the only grip I've seen that includes a second set of full controls on the grip.
6. The camera is very quick. Quick to turn on, save to disk, and autofocus.
7. It has some new technology built in to extend dynamic range (Dynamic Range Optimization). There are a few options of DRO available depending on how aggressive you want to get. On a recent hike, I used it to retain detail in show while maintaining the exposure in the overall scene. It worked really well!
8. Noise at higher ISO is improved over Sony's first model, the A-100. Up to 1600 ISO, noise is minimal. I hardly ever go beyond that.
9. It is fully compatible with legacy Minolta, Konica-Minolta, and third-party lenses available for the A-Mount. I finally can use the lenses i acquired during my Minolta film days.
Re: the Sony 135 STF. This is a Sony rebadge (I believe) of a classic Minolta lens. I'm not totally sure how it works, something about a special optical element that produces superlative bokeh. The downside is that it's manual focus. For more information, go here:
http://www.magnuswedberg.com/index.php?doc=STF-review
http://www.dyxum.com/columns/articles/lenses/SAL-135F28/Sony-AF-135-STF-SAL-135F28_review.asp
http://www.dyxum.com/lenses/detail.asp?IDLens=308
"Too many lenses, not enough time."
Thanks so much for your appraisal of the A700, but thanks sooo much more for enlightening and informing about the 135mm STF lens. That thing is "awesome", and I had no idea. clap
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
My apologies Furono. You started this thread and provided a review of the camera and examples of the lens. I have to admit I was ignorant of the qualities of this lens but I should have investigated further.
Absolutely incredible! I would appreciate any further images as well as "detail" images of the bokeh areas which might not be fully apparent at web sizes.
Thanks,
Moderator of the Cameras and Accessories forums
Ziggy,
Glad to help.
Harry
"Too many lenses, not enough time."